1. When a person is convicted and sentenced to incarceration in a state correctional institution in this state for an aggravated misdemeanor committed while on parole, or is convicted and sentenced to incarceration in any other state of the United States or a foreign country for an offense committed while on parole, and which if committed in this state\n\nTue Dec 09 21:52:03 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 908 (22, 0) §908.10A, VIOLATIONS OF PAROLE OR PROBATION 4\n\nwould be an aggravated misdemeanor, the person’s parole shall be deemed revoked as of the date of the commission of the new aggravated misdemeanor offense.
2. The parole officer shall inform the sentencing judge that the convicted defendant is a parole violator. The term for which the defendant shall be imprisoned as a parole violator shall be the same as that provided in cases of revocation of parole for violation of the conditions of parole. The new sentence of imprisonment for conviction of an aggravated misdemeanor shall be served consecutively with the term imposed for the parole violation, unless a concurrent term of imprisonment is ordered by the court.
3. The parolee shall be notified in writing that parole has been revoked on the basis of the new aggravated misdemeanor conviction, and a copy of the commitment order shall accompany the notification. The inmate’s record shall be reviewed pursuant to the provisions of section 906.5, or as soon as practical after a final reversal of the new aggravated misdemeanor conviction.
4. An inmate may appeal the revocation of parole under this section according to the board of parole’s rules relating to parole revocation appeals. Neither the administrative parole judge nor the board panel shall retry the facts underlying any conviction. 94 Acts, ch 1048, §2; 97 Acts, ch 125, §12; 98 Acts, ch 1197, §9, 13; 2000 Acts, ch 1177, §4, 5; 2018 Acts, ch 1041, §127; 2018 Acts, ch 1068, §3 \n
Notes of Decisions
State of Iowa v. Donald James Hill, 878 N.W.2d 269 (Iowa 2016).
· cites it 42× “In this appeal, we must decide whether the presumption for consecutive sentences in Iowa Code section 908.10A (2013) excuses the district court from the general requirement to state why it imposed a consecutive sentence and, if not, whether the district court’s stated reason for…”
Rhiner v. State, 703 N.W.2d 174 (Iowa 2005).
“See id; see also id § 908.10A (similar procedure for convictions for aggravated misdemeanors).”
Amended June 24, 2016 State of Iowa v. Donald James Hill (Iowa 2016).
· cites it 20× “In this appeal, we must decide whether the presumption for consecutive sentences in Iowa Code section 908.10A (2013) excuses the district court from the general requirement to state why it imposed a consecutive sentence and, if not, whether the district court’s stated reason for…”
State of Iowa v. Amber Dawn Leahy (Iowa Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 4× “But she argues “she is in prison now based on a guilty plea that was accepted without any indication that she had been advised of the consequences of the plea with respect to the other cases for which she was on parole, specifically that section 908.10A would require automatic…”
State of Iowa v. Donald James Hill (Iowa Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 6× “We hold that the sentencing court was not required to give reasons for imposing the consecutive sentences pursuant to Iowa Code section 908.10A (2013). We therefore affirm.”
Faheem Abdul Jabbar v. State of Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 3× “Shortly after his sentencing in the burglary case, the court revoked Jabbar’s parole and reinstated his twenty-year term of imprisonment. Jabbar filed an application for postconviction relief, alleging his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to advise Jabbar about…”
State v. Chairse (Iowa Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 2× “1 Iowa Code section 908.10A requires “[t]he new sentence of imprisonment for conviction of an aggravated misdemeanor shall be served consecutively with the term imposed for the parole violation, unless a concurrent term of imprisonment is ordered by the court.”
State of Iowa v. Gustaf Roy Carlson (Iowa Ct. App. 2024).
· cites it 2× “That discretionary power makes it necessary for the district court to provide its reasoning when sentencing a defendant under section 908.10A. See Hill, 878 N.W.2d at 273 .”
— Iowa Code § 908.10A(2) — 1 case
Faheem Abdul Jabbar v. State of Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2025).
“Shortly after his sentencing in the burglary case, the court revoked Jabbar’s parole and reinstated his twenty-year term of imprisonment. Jabbar filed an application for postconviction relief, alleging his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to advise Jabbar about…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.