K.S.A. » Chapter 12
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 12-1014 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

12-1014.

History: L. 1917, ch. 86, § 12; R.S. 1923, § 12-1014; L. 1945, ch. 100, § 1; L. 1947, ch. 113, § 1; Repealed, L. 2015, ch. 88, § 74; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1977–2007 · leading case: Hinsdale v. City of Liberal,KS, 19 F. App'x 749 (10th Cir. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hinsdale v. City of Liberal,KS, 19 F. App'x 749 (10th Cir. 2001). · cites it 8× “(K.S.A. 12-1014; Code 1983) K.S.A. 12-1014 .”
Warren v. City of Junction City, Kan., 176 F. Supp. 2d 1118 (D. Kan. 2001). · cites it 9× “is that in cases where K.S.A. 12-1014 applies an employee is foreclosed under Kansas law from asserting a property interest based upon either a written contract or an implied contract.”
Riddle v. City of Ottawa, 754 P.2d 465 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 3× “” K.S.A. 12-1014 gives the city manager the power to “appoint and remove all heads of departments, and all subordinate officers and employees of the city.”
Ney v. City of Hoisington, Kan., 508 F. Supp. 2d 877 (D. Kan. 2007). · cites it 2× “at 1125 ; see also K.S.A. § 12-1014; Dehart v. City of Manhattan, 942 F.”
Arceo v. City of Junction City, Kansas, 182 F. Supp. 2d 1062 (D. Kan. 2002). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to K.S.A. § 12-1014, such cities are overseen by a City Manager who is generally responsible for ensuring that the City’s laws and ordinances are enforced.”
Wulf v. City of Wichita, 644 F. Supp. 1211 (D. Kan. 1986). “See K.S.A. 12-1014 (city manager is responsible for the affairs of the city).”
State v. McDonald, 565 P.2d 267 (Kan. 1977). “” Defendant also complains that Hunt was originally hired by the chief of police and not by the city manager pursuant to K.S.A. 12-1014. Hunt was wearing a city police uniform and badge; he was driving a city vehicle, ordinarily driven by the city manager; he had been doing this…”
Dehart v. City of Manhattan, Kan., 942 F. Supp. 1395 (D. Kan. 1996). “The Kansas rule remains that an employment manual, that is only a unilateral expression of company policy and is not bargained for, cannot alone be the basis of an employment contract.”
Jacobsen v. Lambers, 888 F. Supp. 1088 (D. Kan. 1995). · cites it 4× “Lambers is responsible for administering of all city affairs, including the enforcement of municipal laws and ordinances, under K.S.A. § 12-1014. Lambers told Jacobsen that the city had not removed his newsrack but that he would cheek to see where the newsrack was.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.