Still working: heavy queries on the fallback index can run 20-40 seconds.
Your account
Signed in as—
MCP handle—
Plan—
Your details
Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from
your research — which is not logged at all.
Your MCP token
Tokens are never shown here. To issue one against this same account — claude.ai custom connectors
and ChatGPT developer mode need one — start the activation flow.
It lands on the handle above. Install instructions.
Pro — $30/month
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text
highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
History:
L. 1941, ch. 197, § 4; L. 1965, ch. 178, § 4; Repealed, L. 1991, ch. 56, § 28; January 1, 1992.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Applied in upholding trial court's judgment that denial of rezoning was unreasonable. Golden v. City of Overland Park, 224 Kan. 591, 598, 584 P.2d 130.
2. Notice not required of later meeting where zoning plan adopted following public meeting at which zoning action discussed; failure to certify to board of county commissioners an attested copy of zoning plan adopted was ministerial omission only. Board of Lincoln County Comm'rs v. Berner, 5 Kan. App. 2d 104, 108, 109, 613 P.2d 676.
3. Cited; scope of review in zoning matters stated; water availability properly considered in zoning change request. Dings v. Phillips, 237 Kan. 551, 552, 701 P.2d 961 (1985).
Golden v. City of Overland Park, 584 P.2d 130 (Kan. 1978). · cites it 4ד12-704, K.S.A. 19-2916a. The legislature has stressed the making of such plans, and we believe they should not be overlooked when changes in zoning are under consideration.”
Dings v. Phillips, 701 P.2d 961 (Kan. 1985). · cites it 2דDings that the entire subject of water availability is exclusively a matter for the State Board of Agriculture, Division of Water Resources, to resolve and it was improperly considered by the Board herein.”
Bd. of Lincoln Cnty. Comm'rs v. Berner, 613 P.2d 676 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 3דK.S.A. 19-2916a provides in part: “The adoption of the plan, or part thereof, shall be by resolution carried by not less than a majority vote of the full membership of the board.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.