K.S.A. » Chapter 02
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 2-209 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

2-209.

History: L. 1913, ch. 152, § 3; R.S. 1923, § 2-209; Repealed, L. 1929, ch. 1, § 19; May 28.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1985–2010 · leading case: Ling v. Jan's Liquors, 703 P.2d 731 (Kan. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ling v. Jan's Liquors, 703 P.2d 731 (Kan. 1985). · cites it 2× “110, § 2-209(a)(2) (Smith-Hurd 1983). The court stated, "For the purposes of the long-arm statute, `physical presence is not necessary for the commission of a tortious act within this State; .”
United States Surgical Corp. v. Orris, Inc., 5 F. Supp. 2d 1201 (D. Kan. 1998). · cites it 5× “§ 2-209. Arizona Retail Sys., Inc. v. Software Link, Inc.”
Klocek v. Gateway, Inc., 104 F. Supp. 2d 1332 (D. Kan. 2000). · cites it 3× “at 765 (vendor entered into contract by agreeing, to ship goods, or at latest by shipping goods to buyer; license agreement constitutes proposal to modify agreement under § 2-209 which requires express assent 'by buyer); and Orris, 5 F.”
Wachter Mgmt. Co. v. Dexter & Chaney, Inc., 144 P.3d 747 (Kan. 2006). · cites it 2× “Concluding that a contract was formed when the software company agreed to ship the software, the Arizona district court analyzed the shrinkwrap license as a proposed modification of the parties’ contract under section 2-209 of the UCC. 831 F. Supp. at 764-65 .”
Wayman v. Amoco Oil Co., 923 F. Supp. 1322 (D. Kan. 1996). · cites it 2× “Under UCC § 2-209(2), “[a] signed agreement which excludes modification or rescission except by a signed writing cannot be otherwise modified or rescinded.”
Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. & Supply Co., 702 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (D. Kan. 2010). · cites it 3× “§ 2-209(4) provides that attempted modifications which fall short of the requirements of § 2-209(2) may still “operate as a waiver.”
— K.S.A. § 2-209(2) — 2 cases
Wayman v. Amoco Oil Co., 923 F. Supp. 1322 (D. Kan. 1996). “Under UCC § 2-209(2), “[a] signed agreement which excludes modification or rescission except by a signed writing cannot be otherwise modified or rescinded.”
Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. & Supply Co., 702 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (D. Kan. 2010). “§ 2-209(4) provides that attempted modifications which fall short of the requirements of § 2-209(2) may still “operate as a waiver.”
— K.S.A. § 2-209(4) — 1 case
Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. & Supply Co., 702 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (D. Kan. 2010). “§ 2-209(4) provides that attempted modifications which fall short of the requirements of § 2-209(2) may still “operate as a waiver.”
— K.S.A. § 2-209(5) — 1 case
Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. & Supply Co., 702 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (D. Kan. 2010). “§ 2-209(4) provides that attempted modifications which fall short of the requirements of § 2-209(2) may still “operate as a waiver.”
— K.S.A. § 2-209(8)(b) — 1 case
Wayman v. Amoco Oil Co., 923 F. Supp. 1322 (D. Kan. 1996). “Under UCC § 2-209(2), “[a] signed agreement which excludes modification or rescission except by a signed writing cannot be otherwise modified or rescinded.”
— K.S.A. § 2-209(a)(2) — 1 case
Ling v. Jan's Liquors, 703 P.2d 731 (Kan. 1985). “110, § 2-209(a)(2) (Smith-Hurd 1983). The court stated, "For the purposes of the long-arm statute, `physical presence is not necessary for the commission of a tortious act within this State; .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.