K.S.A. § 21-3602
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
21-3602.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3602; L. 1983, ch. 109, § 11; L. 1984, ch. 118, § 3; L. 1992, ch. 298, § 33; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 55; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2023 · leading case: State v. Prine
State v. Prine (2013)
“21-3435, and amendments thereto; (4) incest, as described in K.S.A. 21-3602, and amendments thereto; (5) aggravated incest, as described in K.”
State v. Breeden (2013)
“21-5424, and amendments thereto; (4) incest, as described in K.S.A. 21-3602, prior to its repeal, or subsection (a) of K.”
Commonwealth v. Rahim (2004)
“§ 35-46-1-3 (Lexis 1998); Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 21-3602 21-3603 (1995); La.”
State v. Jones (2004)
“Count II: Incest in violation of K.S.A. 21-3602, a severity level 10 person felony involving the victim S.”
State v. Wilkinson (2000)
“On October 10, 1998, Wilkinson pled no contest to two counts of incest, a severity level 10 person felony, K.S.A. 21-3602. The crimes occurred between June 1, 1996, and April 1, 1997.”
Aid for Women v. Foulston (2004)
“(c) 'Sexual abuse’ means any act committed with a child which is described in article 35, chapter 21 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated and those acts described in K.S.A. 21-3602 or 21-3603 and amendments thereto.”
State v. Scheetz (2023)
“21-5424(a)(1), and amendments thereto; 13 (4) incest, as described in K.S.A. 21-3602, prior to its repeal, or K.”
In Re the Estate of Loughmiller (1981)
“K.S.A. 21-3602 - 3603, amending K.S.A. 21-906 (Corrick).”
State v. VanHecke (2001)
““Sexual abuse” is defined in the CINC code as “any act committed with a child which is described in article 35, chapter 21 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated and those acts described in K.S.A. 21-3602 or 21-3603, and amendments thereto, regardless of the age of the child.”
State v. McMullen (1995)
“21-3506 and K.S.A. 21-3602. Conversely, K.S.A. 1994 Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.