Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 21-3702 (2026)
Repealed
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
21-3702.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3702; L. 1975, ch. 197, § 1; L. 1986, ch. 122, § 1; L. 1995, ch. 251, § 2; L. 2008, ch. 183, § 1; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1977–2007 · leading case: State v. Reynolds, 639 P.2d 461 (Kan. 1982).
State v. Reynolds, 639 P.2d 461 (Kan. 1982). “Further search of the records reveals no instruction based on K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 21-3702(1)(a). Nor would such an instruction have been proper.”
State v. Smith, 573 P.2d 985 (Kan. 1977). “The instruction, based on K.S.A. 21-3702, stated: “Prima facie evidence of intent to permanently deprive owner or lessor of possession, use or benefit of property.”
State v. DeVries, 780 P.2d 1118 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “The trial judge answered that he was just following K.S.A. 21-3702. The State is required by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, every element necessary to constitute the crime with which an accused is charged.”
State v. Young, 784 P.2d 366 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “It is clear from the court’s opinion in Adams that K.S.A. 21-3702(2)(d) does not prohibit a conviction on a lesser offense unless that offense is, on the facts of the case, necessarily proven by a conviction for a greater offense.”
United States v. Brown, 234 F. App'x 838 (10th Cir. 2007). “See K.S.A. § 21-3702(a)(1) (stating the “[t]he giving of a false identification or fictitious name .”
United States v. Brown (10th Cir. 2007). “See K.S.A. § 21-3702(a)(1) (stating the “[t]he giving of a false identification or fictitious name .”
— K.S.A. § 21-3702(1) — 2 cases
State v. Smith, 573 P.2d 985 (Kan. 1977). “The instruction, based on K.S.A. 21-3702, stated: “Prima facie evidence of intent to permanently deprive owner or lessor of possession, use or benefit of property.”
State v. DeVries, 780 P.2d 1118 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “The trial judge answered that he was just following K.S.A. 21-3702. The State is required by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, every element necessary to constitute the crime with which an accused is charged.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3702(1)(a) — 1 case
State v. Reynolds, 639 P.2d 461 (Kan. 1982). “Further search of the records reveals no instruction based on K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 21-3702(1)(a). Nor would such an instruction have been proper.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3702(2) — 1 case
State v. Smith, 573 P.2d 985 (Kan. 1977). “The instruction, based on K.S.A. 21-3702, stated: “Prima facie evidence of intent to permanently deprive owner or lessor of possession, use or benefit of property.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3702(2)(d) — 1 case
State v. Young, 784 P.2d 366 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “It is clear from the court’s opinion in Adams that K.S.A. 21-3702(2)(d) does not prohibit a conviction on a lesser offense unless that offense is, on the facts of the case, necessarily proven by a conviction for a greater offense.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3702(a)(1) — 2 cases
United States v. Brown, 234 F. App'x 838 (10th Cir. 2007). “See K.S.A. § 21-3702(a)(1) (stating the “[t]he giving of a false identification or fictitious name .”
United States v. Brown (10th Cir. 2007). “See K.S.A. § 21-3702(a)(1) (stating the “[t]he giving of a false identification or fictitious name .”
— K.S.A. § 21-3702(l)(a) — 1 case
State v. DeVries, 780 P.2d 1118 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “The trial judge answered that he was just following K.S.A. 21-3702. The State is required by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, every element necessary to constitute the crime with which an accused is charged.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.