K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4403 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4403.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4403; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 225; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 173; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1972–2002 · leading case: Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 205 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (D. Kan. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 205 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (D. Kan. 2002). · cites it 4× “” K.S.A. § 21-4403(a). The criminal penalty imposed under the statute, as Reynolds points out, is a fine of up to $1,000 and up to six months in jail.”
NL Indus., Inc. v. Gulf & W. Indus., Inc., 650 F. Supp. 1115 (D. Kan. 1986). · cites it 3× “21-4405, deceptive commercial practices as defined in K.S.A. 21-4403, and civil conspiracy as defined in K.”
State v. Kliewer, 504 P.2d 580 (Kan. 1972). · cites it 6× “8-611 ( b ), and (2) Committing a deceptive commercial practice contrary to K.S.A. 1971 Supp. 21-4403. The appellant was sentenced to be confined in the Sedgwick County jail for a term not to exceed six months and to pay a fine of $1,000 on each count, the sentences to run…”
In Re Rausch, 32 P.3d 1181 (Kan. 2001). · cites it 2× “On August 7, 2000, in the District Court of Shawnee County, Kansas, die Respondent was charged with having committed deceptive commercial practices, a class B misdemeanor, in violation of K.S.A. 21-4403. Thereafter, on September 28, 2000, die Respondent entered a nolo contendere…”
State v. Palmer, 810 P.2d 734 (Kan. 1991). “8-611(b), and (2) committing a deceptive commercial practice, in violation of K.S.A. 1971 Supp. 21-4403. The defendant appealed.”
State v. Wilson, 728 P.2d 1332 (Kan. Ct. App. 1986). “8-611, and of committing a deceptive commercial practice, K.S.A. 1971 Supp. 21-4403. The single act upon which both charges were based was turning back and resetting a car’s odometer.”
Stohr v. Donahue, 527 P.2d 983 (Kan. 1974). “), was in four counts: (1) committing a deceptive commercial practice (§ 21-4403); (2) theft by obtaining or exerting unauthorized control over property (§ 21-3701 [a]); (3) theft by obtaining by deception control over property (§ 21-3701 [b]); and (4) unlawful deprivation of…”
State v. Montgomery, 796 P.2d 559 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). “8-611[b], cannot also be charged with the general crime of a deceptive commercial practice, K.S.A. 21-4403). *581 The State contends that the legislative intent stated in State v.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4403(a) — 1 case
Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 205 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (D. Kan. 2002). “” K.S.A. § 21-4403(a). The criminal penalty imposed under the statute, as Reynolds points out, is a fine of up to $1,000 and up to six months in jail.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4403(d) — 1 case
Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 205 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (D. Kan. 2002). “” K.S.A. § 21-4403(a). The criminal penalty imposed under the statute, as Reynolds points out, is a fine of up to $1,000 and up to six months in jail.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.