22-3610.
Hearing on appeal; exception.
(a) When a case is appealed to the district court, such court shall hear and determine the cause on the original complaint, unless the complaint shall be found defective, in which case the court may order a new complaint to be filed and the case shall proceed as if the original complaint had not been set aside. The case shall be tried de novo in the district court.
(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a), appeal from a conviction rendered pursuant to subsection (b) of K.S.A. 12-4416 shall be conducted only on the record of the stipulation of facts relating to the complaint.
History:
L. 1970, ch. 129, § 22-3610; L. 1982, ch. 144, § 20; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
31
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1972–2024 · leading case:
State v. Legero, 91 P.3d 1216 (Kan. 2004).
State v. Legero, 91 P.3d 1216 (Kan. 2004).
· cites it 4× “K.S.A. 22-3610(a) states in part: `When a case is appealed to the district court, such court shall hear and determine the cause on the original complaint.”
Colten v. Kentucky, 407 U.S. 104 (1972).
· cites it 2× “1971); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 22-3610 et seq. (Supp. 1971); Me.”
City of Wichita v. Maddox, 24 P.3d 71 (Kan. 2001).
· cites it 7× “Hearing and judgment on appeal shall be as provided in K.S.A. 22-3610 and 22-3611.” K.S.A. 12-4602.”
City of Overland Park v. Barnett, 705 P.2d 564 (Kan. Ct. App. 1985).
· cites it 4× “Hearing and judgment on appeal shall be as provided in K.S.A. 22-3610 and K.S.A. 22-3611." K.S.A.”
City of Overland Park v. Fricke, 601 P.2d 1130 (Kan. 1979).
· cites it 3× “” *499 K.S.A. 22-3610 governs trials when a case is appealed to district court from a court of limited jurisdiction.”
State v. Burkett, 648 P.2d 716 (Kan. 1982).
· cites it 2× “” K.S.A. 22-3610 provides: “When a case is appealed to the district court, such court shall hear and determine the cause on the original complaint, unless the complaint shall be found defective, in which case the court may order a new complaint to be filed and the case shall…”
State v. Kleen, 896 P.2d 376 (Kan. 1995).
· cites it 2× “20-302b(c) and K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 22-3610 give it the right to a de novo hearing before the district judge by providing that any appeal permitted to be taken from an order or final decision of a district magistrate judge shall be tried and determined de novo by a district judge.”
State v. Derusseau, 966 P.2d 694 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 3× “” The appeal hearing is explained in K.S.A. 22-3610. It provides: “(a) When a case is appealed to the district court, such court shall hear and determine the cause on the original complaint .”
City of Overland Park v. Estell, 592 P.2d 909 (Kan. 1979).
· cites it 2× “Hearing and judgment on appeal shall be as provided in K.S.A. 22-3610 and 22-3611.” K.S.A. 1978 Supp.”
City of Shawnee v. Adem, 494 P.3d 134 (Kan. 2021).
“22-3609 (providing a specific procedure for appeals from municipal court to district court); K.S.A. 22-3610 (providing appeals of municipal court convictions shall be tried de novo before the district court with limited exceptions); K.”
State v. Wilson, 808 P.2d 434 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991).
“While the district court’s appellate review is de novo under K.S.A. 22-3610(a), the filing of a timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke the district court’s jurisdiction.”
— K.S.A. § 22-3610(a) — 17 cases
State v. Legero, 91 P.3d 1216 (Kan. 2004).
“K.S.A. 22-3610(a) states in part: `When a case is appealed to the district court, such court shall hear and determine the cause on the original complaint.”
State v. Wilson, 808 P.2d 434 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991).
“While the district court’s appellate review is de novo under K.S.A. 22-3610(a), the filing of a timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke the district court’s jurisdiction.”
State v. Derusseau, 966 P.2d 694 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998).
“” The appeal hearing is explained in K.S.A. 22-3610. It provides: “(a) When a case is appealed to the district court, such court shall hear and determine the cause on the original complaint .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.