K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-4101 (2026)

Citation of act

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-4101. Citation of act. K.S.A. 60-4101 through 60-4126 and K.S.A. 60-4127, and amendments thereto, shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas standard asset seizure and forfeiture act.

History: L. 1994, ch. 339, § 1; L. 2018, ch. 26, § 3; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case: State ex rel. Topeka Police Dep't v. $895.00 U.S. Currency, 133 P.3d 91 (Kan. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Topeka Police Dep't v. $895.00 U.S. Currency, 133 P.3d 91 (Kan. 2006). “Standard of Review The resolution of this case involves statutoiy provisions of the Kansas Standard Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act, K.S.A. 60-4101 et seq. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, and an appellate court’s review is unlimited.”
State ex rel. Goddard v. Gravano, 108 P.3d 251 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “1311 (McKinney 2003); N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 75D-1 to D-14 (2003); Tenn.”
State ex rel. Kansas High. Patrol v. One 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Classic/Impala SS VIN 31G1BL52P8SR191732, 382 P.3d 476 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “That notice explained the State's intent to seek forfeiture of the vehicle under the Kansas Standard Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act, K.S.A. 60-4101 et seq., but was not accompanied by a probable cause affidavit.”
State v. $6,618.00 U.S. Currency, 128 P.3d 413 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “: This forfeiture action was commenced under the Kansas Standard Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act (K.S.A. 60-4101 *55 et seq.). Ahmed Mohamed-Abdulla-Omar Al-Haj (hereafter “Al-Haj”) appeals the district court’s order forfeiting a 1998 Chevrolet Tahoe and $4,453.”
State ex rel. Geary Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't v. One 2008 Toyota Tundra, 415 P.3d 449 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018). “FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In March 2016, the State of Kansas on behalf of the Geary County Sheriff's Department commenced a civil asset forfeiture action *453 for property allegedly seized in violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act pursuant to K.S.A. 60-4101…”
State v. Gunn, 26 P.3d 710 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “The statutes relating to the forfeiture of property have been transferred to chapter 60 and may now be found in the Kansas Standard Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act, K.S.A. 60-4101 et seq. I believe the validity of White has become questionable by the repeal of the statute upon…”
State v. Yeoman, 951 P.2d 964 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “65-4171, was repealed in 1994 and replaced by K.S.A. 60-4101 et seq., which was the controlling statute in the present case.”
State I-135/I-70 Drug Task Force v. 1990 Lincoln Town Car, 145 P.3d 921 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “: David Smith appeals from a forfeiture action held pursuant to the Kansas Standard Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act (Act), K.S.A. 60-4101 et seq. We affirm. On October 25, 2004, Kansas Highway Patrol Trooper David Grittman stopped Smith for an expired license tag.”
Kansas High. Patrol ex rel. Settle v. 1985 Chevrolet Astro Van VinIGCDM15NOFB177466, 954 P.2d 718 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “Subsections (g) and (h) of 60-4113 set forth the applicable burdens of proof for both parties: “(g) The issue shall be determined by the court alone, and the hearing on the claim shall be held within 60 days after service of the petition unless continued for good cause.”
City of Hoisington v. $2,044 in U.S. Currency, 8 P.3d 58 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). “CONSTITUTIONALITY OF KANSAS ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE ACT Steinert attacks the constitutionality of the Kansas Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act, K.S.A. 60-4101 et seq. The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law, and our review is unlimited.”
Thompson v. State, 929 P.2d 803 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996). “65-4171, has since been repealed and replaced by K.S.A. 60-4101 et seq.) The statutory forfeiture provides for a civil proceeding in rem.”
State v. U.S. Currency in the Amount of $3,743, 956 P.2d 1351 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “Although the legislature replaced those provisions in 1994 by adopting the Kansas Standard Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act, K.S.A. 60-4101 et seq., the new Act applies when the acts giving rise to the forfeiture occur after July 1,1994.”
Show all 24 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.