Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 65

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 65.210

Short title of KRS 65.210 to 65.300

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

KRS 65.210 to 65.300 may be cited as the Interlocal Cooperation Act. History: Created 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 216, sec. 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1990–2019 · leading case: Board of Trustees of the Kentucky School Boards Insurance Trust v. Joseph N. Pope Jr Deputy Rehabilitator of the Kentuck
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Board of Trustees of the Kentucky School Boards Insurance Trust v. Joseph N. Pope Jr Deputy Rehabilitator of the Kentuck (2017) ky “150(3) under the authority of KRS 65.210 et seq., the Inter-local Cooperation Act.”
Phipps v. Commonwealth (1996) kyctapp “(4) Any county may enter into an agreement pursuant to KRS 65.210 to 65.300 to provide or to use jail facilities.”
Commonwealth Education & Humanities Cabinet Department of Education v. Gobert (1998) kyctapp “017, and KRS 65.210 et. seq. The trial court rejected this argument and we adopt that portion of its opinion as set forth below as our own: However, it is not entirely clear that KRS 18A.”
Franklin County, Ky. v. Malone (1997) ky · cites it 2× “150(3) under the authority of KRS 65.210 et seq., the Inter-local Cooperation Act.”
Board of Trustees of the Kentucky School Boards Insurance Trust v. Joseph N. Pope Jr Deputy Rehabilitator of the Kentuck (2017) ky “150(3) under the authority of KRS 65.210 et seq., the Inter_;local Cooperation Act.”
Silverburg v. Haney (2019) kyed “025, which specifically authorizes Kentucky counties to enter into agreements with other counties to hold prisoners that are arrested and/or sentenced in that county.”
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Detention Center v. Crockett (1990) ky · cites it 2× “Entering into an agreement to house federal prisoners pursuant to the “Interlocal Cooperation Act,” KRS 65.210, et seq., and KRS 441.025, is a power, not a duty, imposed upon County Government.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.