Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 36, § 575-A (2026)

Determining compliance with forest management and harvest plan

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Assistance to assessor.  Upon request of a municipal assessor or the State Tax Assessor and in accordance with section 579, the Director of the Bureau of Forestry within the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry may provide assistance in evaluating a forest management and harvest plan to determine whether the plan meets the definition of a forest management and harvest plan in section 573, subsection 3‑A. Upon request of a municipal assessor or the State Tax Assessor, the Director of the Bureau of Forestry may provide assistance in determining whether a harvest or other silvicultural activity conducted on land enrolled under this subchapter complies with the forest management and harvest plan prepared for that parcel of land. When assistance is requested under this section and section 579, the Director of the Bureau of Forestry or the director's designee may enter and examine forest land for the purpose of determining compliance with the forest management and harvest plan.  
[PL 2011, c. 619, §1 (NEW); PL 2011, c. 657, Pt. W, §§5, 7 (REV); PL 2013, c. 405, Pt. A, §23 (REV).]
2.  Random sampling and report. 
[PL 2011, c. 619, §1 (NEW); PL 2011, c. 657, Pt. W, §§5, 7 (REV); PL 2013, c. 405, Pt. A, §23 (REV); MRSA T. 36 §575-A, sub-§2 (RP).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 2001, c. 603, §5 (NEW). PL 2011, c. 619, §1 (RPR). PL 2011, c. 657, Pt. W, §§5, 7 (REV). PL 2013, c. 405, Pt. A, §23 (REV).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: Francis Small Heritage Trust, Inc. v. Town of Limington, 2014 ME 102 (Me. 2014).
Francis Small Heritage Trust, Inc. v. Town of Limington, 2014 ME 102 (Me. 2014). “9, 2013) (codified at 36 M.R.S. §§ 575-A, 577, 579, 581-F to 581-G (2013)).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.