Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 566.224 (2026)

Fraudulent intent; question of fact.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Revised Statutes of 1846

R.S. of 1846

566.224 Fraudulent intent; question of fact.

Sec. 4.

The question of fraudulent intent, in all cases arising under this, or either of the last 2 preceding chapters, shall be deemed a question of fact and not of law.

History: R.S. 1846, Ch. 82 ;-- CL 1857, 3201 ;-- CL 1871, 4716 ;-- How. 6206 ;-- CL 1897, 9536 ;-- CL 1915, 12001 ;-- CL 1929, 13437 ;-- CL 1948, 566.224

Compiler's Notes:

For provisions of “the last 2 preceding chapters,” referred to in this section, see MCL 566.131 et seq. and MCL 566.101 et seq.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1989–2015 · leading case: Bodenhamer Bldg. Corp. v. Architectural Rsch. Corp. Am. Standards Testing Bureau, Inc. & Ar-Lite Panelcraft, Inc., 873 F.2d 109 (6th Cir. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Bodenhamer Bldg. Corp. v. Architectural Rsch. Corp. Am. Standards Testing Bureau, Inc. & Ar-Lite Panelcraft, Inc., 873 F.2d 109 (6th Cir. 1989). “The question of fraudulent intent, in all cases arising under Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 566.101 et seq. is a question of fact and not of law.”

Webster v. Barbara (In Re Otis & Edwards, P.C.), 115 B.R. 900 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1990). “§ 566.224. 63 . When the transferee's position allows it to dominate or control the debtor’s disposition, the transferee’s intent may be imputed to the debt- or-transferor.”

City of Riverview v. Forest Island Recycling II Inc (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “MCL 566.224; Dillard, ___ Mich App at ___; slip op at 11.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.