Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1414 (2026)

Repeal.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE

Act 170 of 1964

691.1414 Repeal.

Sec. 14.

Chapter 22 of Act No. 283 of the Public Acts of 1909, as amended, being sections 242.1 to 242.8 of the Compiled Laws of 1948; section 2904 of Act No. 236 of the Public Acts of 1961, being section 600.2904 of the Compiled Laws of 1948; Act No. 59 of the Public Acts of 1951, as amended, being sections 124.101 to 124.103 of the Compiled Laws of 1948, are repealed.

History: 1964, Act 170, Eff. July 1, 1965

PopularName Notes:

Governmental Immunity Act

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1970–2016 · leading case: Forest v. Parmalee, 262 N.W.2d 653 (Mich. 1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Forest v. Parmalee, 262 N.W.2d 653 (Mich. 1978). · cites it 2× “However, examination of the latter statute discloses that "[t]he provisions of law respecting the liability of townships, cities, villages and corporations for damages for injuries resulting from a failure in the performance of the same duty respecting roads under their control"…”

Maki v. City of East Tawas, 170 N.W.2d 530 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). · cites it 4× “" MCLA § 691.1408 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 3.”

Peters v. Dep't of State Highways, 252 N.W.2d 799 (Mich. 1977). “996(114): "If said public highway, street, bridge, sidewalk, crosswalk or culvert is in a condition which is not reasonably safe and fit for travel either by persons, animals or vehicles, because of defects in the original construction, then it shall not be necessary to show…”

Bonner v. Moore, 216 N.W.2d 458 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974). “, which was repealed by MCLA 691.1414; MSA 3.996(114). Hence, the liability of defendant is to be found in MCLA 691.”

Rosie Withers v. City of Detroit (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “III The city asserts that Withers’s notice was directed to an inappropriate person and was sent in a manner that contravened MCL 691.1414, which provides, in pertinent part: (1) As a condition to any recovery for injuries sustained by reason of any defective highway, the injured…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.