Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.22 (2026)
Annual report.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
PROBATE CODE OF 1939
Act 288 of 1939
712A.22 Annual report.
Sec. 22.
The state court administrative office shall publish an annual report evaluating the court regarding its duty under this act to engage in obtaining permanency for children. The report shall include at least information and statistics detailing the court's adherence to each time period prescribed by this act or court rule for the management and disposition of children's cases that are petitioned under section 2(b) of this chapter and, if the court fails to adhere to a time period, the specific reasons for that failure.
History: Add. 1997, Act 169, Eff. Mar. 31, 1998
Compiler's Notes:
Former MCL 712A.22, which pertained to appeals to circuit court, was repealed by Act 543 of 1978, Eff. July 1, 1979.
PopularName Notes:
Probate CodePopularName Notes:
Juvenile CodeNotes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases, 1950–1985 · leading case: Reist v. Bay Circuit Judge, 241 N.W.2d 55 (Mich. 1976).
Reist v. Bay Circuit Judge, 241 N.W.2d 55 (Mich. 1976). “2 The juvenile code [MCLA 712A.22; MSA 27.3178(598.22)] provides that an appeal "may be taken to the circuit court by * * * any person aggrieved by any order of the juvenile division of the probate court” as provided in MCLA 701.”
In Re Weldon, 244 N.W.2d 827 (Mich. 1976). “[13] MCLA 712A.22; MSA 27.3178(598.22), GCR 1963, 701.”
People v. Dunbar, 377 N.W.2d 262 (Mich. 1985). “The probate judge's decision to waive jurisdiction was timely appealed to the Wayne Circuit Court pursuant to MCL 712A.22; MSA 27.3178(598.22) (repealed by 1978 PA 543 , § 1, effective July 1, 1979, and replaced by MCL 600.”
In the Matter of Ward, 304 N.W.2d 844 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “Beverly Bates Ward filed an appeal of right in circuit court pursuant to MCL 712A.22; MSA 27.3178(598.22), which has been repealed by 1978 PA 543 , effective July 1, 1979.”
People v. Fields, 216 N.W.2d 51 (Mich. 1974). “This is the process by which the common law (and indeed a great amount of statutory law, so much of which is assimilative of the common law) was formed.”
People v. Mahone, 254 N.W.2d 907 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “2, MCLA 712A.22; MSA 27.3178(598.22) and MCLA 701.”
In the Matter of LaFlure, 210 N.W.2d 482 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973). “MCLA 712A.22; MSA 27.3178 (598.22); MCLA 701.”
People v. Schumacher, 256 N.W.2d 39 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “Defendant appealed this decision to the circuit court pursuant to statute, MCLA 712A.22, 701.45a; MSA 27.3178(598.22), 27.”
Sovereign v. Sovereign, 92 N.W.2d 585 (Mich. 1958). “These constitutional and statutory provisions appear to follow a popular and legislative design in the creation of a division of the probate court with special jurisdiction, special powers of disposition, and specialized staffing as to children’s problems in dependency and…”
People v. Billington, 323 N.W.2d 343 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). “863, which states that a person aggrieved by a final order, sentence or judgment of a probate court may appeal from that order to the circuit court; appeal to this Court in a case of this type is by application and not as a matter of right.”
Doe v. Oettle, 293 N.W.2d 760 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). “We agree with the lower court that if plaintiffs wanted to challenge the probate order denying them custody of their children, the proper procedure would be to timely appeal the probate court’s decision.”
Jewell v. Grand Traverse Cnty. Prob. Judge, 214 N.W.2d 717 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974). “GCR 1963, 701; MCLA 712A.22; MSA 27.3178(598.22). Since this was not done, the general chancery power of the circuit court, codified originally in MCLA 722.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.