Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.626 (2026)

Detention of child in temporary protective custody; preliminary hearing; examinations; report; medical evaluation.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CHILD PROTECTION LAW

Act 238 of 1975

722.626 Detention of child in temporary protective custody; preliminary hearing; examinations; report; medical evaluation.

Sec. 6.

(1) If a child suspected of being abused or neglected is admitted to a hospital or brought to a hospital for outpatient services and the attending physician determines that the release of the child would endanger the child's health or welfare, the attending physician shall notify the person in charge and the department. The person in charge may detain the child in temporary protective custody until the next regular business day of the probate court, at which time the probate court shall order the child detained in the hospital or in some other suitable place pending a preliminary hearing as required by section 14 of chapter 12A of the probate code of 1939, 1939 PA 288, MCL 712A.14, or order the child released to the child's parent, guardian, or custodian.

(2) When a child suspected of being an abused or neglected child is seen by a physician, the physician shall make the necessary examinations, which may include physical examinations, x-rays, photographs, laboratory studies, and other pertinent studies. The physician's written report to the department shall contain summaries of the evaluation, including medical test results.

(3) If a report is made by a person other than a physician, or if the physician's report is not complete, the department may request a court order for a medical evaluation of the child. The department shall have a medical evaluation made without a court order if either of the following occurs:

(a) The child's health is seriously endangered and a court order cannot be obtained.

(b) The child is displaying symptoms suspected to be the result of exposure to or contact with methamphetamine production.

History: 1975, Act 238, Eff. Oct. 1, 1975 ;-- Am. 1984, Act 418, Eff. Mar. 29, 1985 ;-- Am. 2006, Act 266, Imd. Eff. July 6, 2006

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case: Lavey v. Mills, 639 N.W.2d 261 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lavey v. Mills, 639 N.W.2d 261 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “First, defendants Beauchaine and Pittman argue that they are entitled to statutory immunity because they were acting pursuant to subsection 6(2) of the act, MCL 722.626(2), when they authorized KB’s gynecological examination.”

In Re Albring, 408 N.W.2d 545 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “14) provides, in turn, that, where the probate court authorizes the filing of a complaint at the close of the preliminary hearing, the court "shall also direct the placement of the child, pending investigation and hearing, which placement may be in the home of parents, guardian…”

Minor Doe v. Trinity Health-Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “at 256 , quoting MCL 722.626(3). It was “clear” that the trooper and CPS worker “violated [MCL 722.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.626(2) — 1 case

Lavey v. Mills, 639 N.W.2d 261 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “First, defendants Beauchaine and Pittman argue that they are entitled to statutory immunity because they were acting pursuant to subsection 6(2) of the act, MCL 722.626(2), when they authorized KB’s gynecological examination.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.626(3) — 2 cases

Minor Doe v. Trinity Health-Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “at 256 , quoting MCL 722.626(3). It was “clear” that the trooper and CPS worker “violated [MCL 722.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.