Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 428B.10 (2026)

Coordination Of Districts

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If a county establishes a tourism improvement district in a city or town under this chapter, a city or town may not establish a tourism improvement district in the part of the city or town located in the county-established district. If a city or town establishes a tourism improvement district under this chapter, a county may not establish a tourism improvement district in the part of the city or town located in the city- or town-established district.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'n, 615 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 2000).
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'n, 615 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 2000). · cites it 2× “12 (1998), she is entitled to benefits under Minn.Stat. § 428B.10, subd. 1(a), and if she is not entitled to benefits, then the statutes violate the Equal Protection Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.