Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 609.55 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1989 c 290 art 7 s 14]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1967–1988 · leading case: State v. Beito, 332 N.W.2d 645 (Minn. 1983).
State v. Beito, 332 N.W.2d 645 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 4× “As stated in the comments to section 609.55, the typical case covered by section 609.”
In Re the Welfare of K.J.K., 357 N.W.2d 117 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “with unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.55, subd. 2 (1982), and a motion to refer him for prosecution as an adult were filed in Koochiching County Court.”
Effinger v. State, 380 N.W.2d 483 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 2× “11; and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.55 (1984) with reference to section 609.”
In Re the Welfare of M. A., 310 N.W.2d 699 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “This is an appeal by a juvenile, who was 16 at the time of the acts in question, from a decision of the Juvenile Division of the Hennepin County District Court finding that he had committed two separate acts of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in violation of Minn.Stat. §…”
In Re the Welfare of C.D.L., 306 N.W.2d 819 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “This is an appeal by a juvenile from an order of the Juvenile Division, Hennepin County District Court, finding that he committed a delinquent act, namely, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.55, subd. 2 (1980). The court placed appellant on…”
State v. Darrow, 177 N.W.2d 778 (Minn. 1970). · cites it 2× “1967, § 609.55. Defendant’s principal contention is that there was insufficient evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of the crime.”
State v. LaRose, 174 N.W.2d 247 (Minn. 1970). · cites it 2× “That statute provides as follows: “Whoever intentionally does any of the following may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 90 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $100: í}í s}: s)c s{e “(9) Without the permission of the owner, tampers with or gets into or…”
State v. Stauffacher, 380 N.W.2d 843 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “1(2) (1984); and one count of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, Minn. Stat. § 609.55 , subd. 2 (1984). The court vacated the third degree criminal sexual conduct conviction as a lesser-included count and sentenced appellant to 240 months on one conviction of first degree…”
State v. Myers, 413 N.W.2d 122 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “1(1) (1986), and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, Minn.Stat. § 609.55 (1986). Appellant Joseph Myers was found guilty by a jury of both counts and sentenced to 109 months for possess-mg stolen property and to a concurrent sentence of 23 months for the unauthorized use…”
State v. Murphy, 152 N.W.2d 507 (Minn. 1967). “The offense of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle is defined by § 609.55, subd. 2, which provides: “Whoever intentionally takes and drives a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner or his authorized agent may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than three years or…”
State v. Jackson, 365 N.W.2d 777 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “-245 (1982), and unauthorized use of motor vehicle, Minn.Stat. § 609.55, subd. 1 and 2 (1982).”
State v. Liebfried, 345 N.W.2d 281 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “3 (1980), and four counts of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.55 (1980). The trial court departed both durationally and dispositionally in sentencing defendant on February 2, 1981, to 60 months in prison for the forgery offense.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.