Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-102 (2026)
Scope of article
✓ current as of July 2026
Article 1 applies to a transaction to the extent that it is governed by another article of the Uniform Commercial Code.
Former § 75-1-102 [Codes, 1942, § 41A:1-102; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 1-102, eff. 3/31/1968; repealed by Laws, 2010, ch. 506, § 44, eff. 7/1/2010] is now found in comparable provisions enacted at §§ 75-1-103, 75-1-106 and 75-1-302 by Laws, 2010, ch. 506, § 3, eff. 7/1/2010. Present § 75-1-102 was enacted by Laws, 2010, ch. 506, § 3, eff. 7/1/2010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1974–2004 · leading case: White v. Hancock Bank, 477 So. 2d 265 (Miss. 1985).
White v. Hancock Bank, 477 So. 2d 265 (Miss. 1985). “Miss. Code Ann. §§ 75-1-102 (3) and 4-103(1) (1972).”
Hancock Bank v. Ensenat, 819 So. 2d 3 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “" Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-102(1) (Supp.2001).”
Delta Chem. & Petroleum, Inc. v. Citizens Bank of Byhalia, 790 So. 2d 862 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-102 (2)(c) (Rev.1991).”
Bay Springs Forest Prods., Inc. v. Wade, 435 So. 2d 690 (Miss. 1983). “At all times that timber has been owned by the Wades.”
Dawkins & Co. v. L & L PLANTING CO., 602 So. 2d 838 (Miss. 1992). “(2)(a) to simplify, clarify and modernize the law governing commercial transactions; (b) to permit the continued expansion of commercial practices through custom, usage and agreement of the parties; Miss.”
Price v. Int'l Tel. & Tel. Corp., 651 F. Supp. 706 (S.D. Miss. 1986). “§ 75-2-725, which states that a cause of action for breach of warranty accrues when tender of delivery is made. The court rejects this argument and concludes that Mississippi’s adoption of the U.”
Secirity Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Cox, 299 So. 2d 192 (Miss. 1974). “Miss. Code Ann. §§ 75-1-102 (2)(b) and 75-1-205(1) (1972).”
Paschal v. Hamilton, 363 So. 2d 1360 (Miss. 1978). “" Therefore, 1(d) is controlling and good faith purchasers (here the Hamiltons) take a good title.”
First Sw. Corp. v. Lampton, 724 So. 2d 988 (Miss. Ct. App. 1998). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-102(2). Lampton wished that the chancellor negate the requirements of the UCC because of the difficulty that he was facing in acquiring a bond.”
St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. v. Merchants & Marine Bank (Miss. 2003). “See generally Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-102 (1972) (stating general purposes of the UCC).”
St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. v. Merchants & Marine Bank, 882 So. 2d 766 (Miss. 2004). “See generally Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-102 (1972) (stating general purposes of the UCC).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-102(1) — 1 case
Hancock Bank v. Ensenat, 819 So. 2d 3 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “" Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-102(1) (Supp.2001).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-102(2) — 1 case
First Sw. Corp. v. Lampton, 724 So. 2d 988 (Miss. Ct. App. 1998). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-102(2). Lampton wished that the chancellor negate the requirements of the UCC because of the difficulty that he was facing in acquiring a bond.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-102(2)(a)(c) — 1 case
Hancock Bank v. Ensenat, 819 So. 2d 3 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “" Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-102(1) (Supp.2001).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.