Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201 (2026)

General definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Former § 75-1-201 [Codes, 1942, § 41A:1-201; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 1-201; Laws, 1977, ch. 452, § 2; Laws, 1990, ch. 384, § 45; Laws, 1992, ch. 420, § 69; Laws, 1994, ch. 445, § 3; Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 5; Laws, 2006, ch. 527, § 41; Laws, 2007, ch. 355, § 34; Laws, 2007, ch. 381, § 34, eff. 3/15/2007; repealed by Laws, 2010, ch. 506, § 44, eff. 7/1/2010] is now found in comparable provisions at §§ 75-1-201, 75-1-202, 75-1-20375-1-204 and 75-1-206 enacted by Laws, 2010, ch. 506, § 3, eff. 7/1/2010; Former § 75-1-201(21) and (41) were deleted by Laws, 2010, ch. 506, §§ 1 and and 44, eff. 7/1/2010; Present § 75-1-201 is derived from former § 75-1-201(1)-(20), (22)-(24), (28)-(30), (32)-(36), (38)-(40), (42)-(43), and (45)-(46); [Codes, 1942, § 41A:1-201; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 1-201; Laws, 1977, ch. 452, § 2; Laws, 1990, ch. 384, § 45; Laws, 1992, ch. 420, § 69; Laws, 1994, ch. 445, § 3; Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 5; Laws, 2006, ch. 527, § 41; Laws, 2007, ch. 355, § 34; Laws, 2007, ch. 381, § 34, eff. 3/15/2007; repealed by Laws, 2010, ch. 506, § 44, eff. 7/1/2010] and was enacted by Laws, 2010, ch. 506, § 3, eff. 7/1/2010.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1978–2025 · leading case: Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Motts, Inc. of Mississippi, 459 F. Supp. 7 (N.D. Miss. 1978).
Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Motts, Inc. of Mississippi, 459 F. Supp. 7 (N.D. Miss. 1978). · cites it 4× ““Notice” and “notification” have specific meanings when used in the Code, Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-201(25), and do not have to be in written form.”
Delta Chem. & Petroleum, Inc. v. Citizens Bank of Byhalia, 790 So. 2d 862 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-201(43) (Rev.1991).”
Scaggs v. Gpch-gp, Inc., 931 So. 2d 1274 (Miss. 2006). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-201(25) (Rev.2002).”
In Re Yarbrough, 211 B.R. 654 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1997). · cites it 5× “Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201 (37) (1994). The amended definition of a security interest states in relevant part: ' (37) “Security interest” means an interest in personal property or fixtures which secures payment or performance of an obligation.”
Merchants & Planters Bank v. Williamson, 691 So. 2d 398 (Miss. 1997). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201 (19). There is insufficient evidence in the record supporting a finding that the Bank breached the duty of good faith and fair dealing which it owed to Williamson.”
Leon Warrington v. Ray Dawson, 798 F.2d 1533 (5th Cir. 1986). · cites it 4× “Miss Code Ann. § 75-1-201(25) (1972) (emphasis added).”
Shell Oil Co. v. Mills Oil Co., Inc., Citizens Bank of Byhalia, Ms., Dudley R. Moore, Jr. & John Mark Crain, D.D. Mills, 717 F.2d 208 (5th Cir. 1983). · cites it 3× “Although noting that the common law required lack of knowledge to achieve bona fide purchaser status, and that this requirement is carried forward in certain Code sections, the court concluded that “the Code’s definition of an Article Two good faith purchaser does not expressly…”
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Robert L. Weaver, John C. Weaver & Sons & Weaver Farms, Defendants, 680 F.2d 451 (6th Cir. 1982). “[i]ts place of business if it has one, or its chief executive office if it has more than one place of business.”
Shutze v. Credithrift of Am., Inc., 607 So. 2d 55 (Miss. 1992). · cites it 2× “2, March 25, 1992); see also, Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201 (37) (Supp. 1991); and South Mississippi Finance Company v.”
Omnibank of Mantee v. United S. Bank, 607 So. 2d 76 (Miss. 1992). “, Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201 (23) (rev. 1989) (defining insolvency).”
Mid-South Packers, Inc. v. Shoney's, Inc., 761 F.2d 1117 (5th Cir. 1985). “Finally, the parties’ “course of performance” is consistent only with Mid-South’s expressed offer and Shoney’s expressed acceptance of the new price. Miss.Code Ann. § 75-l-205(3)-(4); Cf Miss.”
Dawkins & Co. v. L & L PLANTING CO., 602 So. 2d 838 (Miss. 1992). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201 (39) provides: "Signed" includes any symbol extended or adopted by a party with present intent to authenticate a writing.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(14) — 1 case
Crosby v. Peoples Bank of Indianola, 472 So. 2d 951 (Miss. 1985).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(19) — 2 cases
Shell Oil Co. v. Mills Oil Co., Inc., Citizens Bank of Byhalia, Ms., Dudley R. Moore, Jr. & John Mark Crain, D.D. Mills, 717 F.2d 208 (5th Cir. 1983). “Although noting that the common law required lack of knowledge to achieve bona fide purchaser status, and that this requirement is carried forward in certain Code sections, the court concluded that “the Code’s definition of an Article Two good faith purchaser does not expressly…”
Mississippi Comm'n on Env't Quality v. Desai, 868 So. 2d 381 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(25) — 4 cases
Scaggs v. Gpch-gp, Inc., 931 So. 2d 1274 (Miss. 2006). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-201(25) (Rev.2002).”
Leon Warrington v. Ray Dawson, 798 F.2d 1533 (5th Cir. 1986). “Miss Code Ann. § 75-1-201(25) (1972) (emphasis added).”
Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Motts, Inc. of Mississippi, 459 F. Supp. 7 (N.D. Miss. 1978). ““Notice” and “notification” have specific meanings when used in the Code, Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-201(25), and do not have to be in written form.”
Credit Lyonnais New York Branch v. Koval, 745 So. 2d 837 (Miss. 1999).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(26) — 2 cases
Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Motts, Inc. of Mississippi, 459 F. Supp. 7 (N.D. Miss. 1978). ““Notice” and “notification” have specific meanings when used in the Code, Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-201(25), and do not have to be in written form.”
Leon Warrington v. Ray Dawson, 798 F.2d 1533 (5th Cir. 1986). “Miss Code Ann. § 75-1-201(25) (1972) (emphasis added).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(28) — 2 cases
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Robert L. Weaver, John C. Weaver & Sons & Weaver Farms, Defendants, 680 F.2d 451 (6th Cir. 1982). “[i]ts place of business if it has one, or its chief executive office if it has more than one place of business.”
Blalock v. United States, 695 F. Supp. 874 (N.D. Miss. 1988).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(3) — 1 case
Mid-South Packers, Inc. v. Shoney's, Inc., 761 F.2d 1117 (5th Cir. 1985). “Finally, the parties’ “course of performance” is consistent only with Mid-South’s expressed offer and Shoney’s expressed acceptance of the new price. Miss.Code Ann. § 75-l-205(3)-(4); Cf Miss.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(30) — 1 case
Blalock v. United States, 695 F. Supp. 874 (N.D. Miss. 1988).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(32) — 2 cases
Shell Oil Co. v. Mills Oil Co., Inc., Citizens Bank of Byhalia, Ms., Dudley R. Moore, Jr. & John Mark Crain, D.D. Mills, 717 F.2d 208 (5th Cir. 1983). “Although noting that the common law required lack of knowledge to achieve bona fide purchaser status, and that this requirement is carried forward in certain Code sections, the court concluded that “the Code’s definition of an Article Two good faith purchaser does not expressly…”
First Sw. Corp. v. Lampton, 724 So. 2d 988 (Miss. Ct. App. 1998).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(37) — 2 cases
Crosby v. Peoples Bank of Indianola, 472 So. 2d 951 (Miss. 1985).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(38) — 2 cases
Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Motts, Inc. of Mississippi, 459 F. Supp. 7 (N.D. Miss. 1978). ““Notice” and “notification” have specific meanings when used in the Code, Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-201(25), and do not have to be in written form.”
Leon Warrington v. Ray Dawson, 798 F.2d 1533 (5th Cir. 1986). “Miss Code Ann. § 75-1-201(25) (1972) (emphasis added).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(39) — 1 case
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(43) — 2 cases
Delta Chem. & Petroleum, Inc. v. Citizens Bank of Byhalia, 790 So. 2d 862 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-1-201(43) (Rev.1991).”
Polles v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 749 F. Supp. 136 (N.D. Miss. 1990).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(44) — 1 case
Shell Oil Co. v. Mills Oil Co., Inc., Citizens Bank of Byhalia, Ms., Dudley R. Moore, Jr. & John Mark Crain, D.D. Mills, 717 F.2d 208 (5th Cir. 1983). “Although noting that the common law required lack of knowledge to achieve bona fide purchaser status, and that this requirement is carried forward in certain Code sections, the court concluded that “the Code’s definition of an Article Two good faith purchaser does not expressly…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-1-201(9) — 1 case
Genesis Indem. Ins. v. Bolivar Cnty., 793 So. 2d 683 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.