Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-403 (2026)

Agreement not to assert defenses against assignee

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Former 1972 Code § 75-9-403 [Codes, 1942, § 41A:9-403; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 9-403; Laws, 1977, ch. 452, § 26; Laws, 1978, ch. 401, § 8; Laws, 1979, ch. 369; Laws, 1985, ch. 381, § 1; Laws, 1987, ch. 373, eff. 7/1/1987] is now found in comparable provisions enacted at §§ 75-9-515, 75-9-516, 75-9-519, 75-9-522, and 75-9-525 by Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 1. Present § 75-9-403 was derived from former 1972 Code § 75-9-206 [Codes, 1942, § 41A:9-206; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 9-206, eff. 3/31/1968] and was enacted by Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 1, eff. 1/1/2002.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1975–1986 · leading case: In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985).
In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985). · cites it 5× “The filing requirement is expressly defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1): “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this chapter.”
In Re Abell, 66 B.R. 375 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1986). · cites it 5× “Upon timely filing of the continuation statement, the effectiveness of the original statement is continued for five (5) years after the last date to which the filing was effective, whereupon it lapses in the same manner as provided in subsection (2) unless another continuation…”
In the Matter of Rex L. Hammons, Bankrupts. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Fedders Fin. Corp., 614 F.2d 399 (5th Cir. 1980). “Under Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403 (Supp. 1979), a financing statement which does not state a maturity date continues to be effective for five years and may be renewed by the creditor for an indefinite number of successive five-year periods.”
Bankrupt Est. v. S. Trailer Distributors, Inc., 508 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1975). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. 75-9-403(2). '(A) filing which is made in the proper place in this state continues effective even though the debtor's residence or place of business .”
Hilburn v. S. Trailer Distributors, Inc., 508 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1975). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(2). “[A] filing which is made in the proper place in this state continues effective even though the debtor’s residence or place of business .”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1) — 1 case
In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985). “The filing requirement is expressly defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1): “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this chapter.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-403(2) — 4 cases
In Re Abell, 66 B.R. 375 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1986). “Upon timely filing of the continuation statement, the effectiveness of the original statement is continued for five (5) years after the last date to which the filing was effective, whereupon it lapses in the same manner as provided in subsection (2) unless another continuation…”
In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985). “The filing requirement is expressly defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1): “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this chapter.”
Bankrupt Est. v. S. Trailer Distributors, Inc., 508 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1975). “Miss.Code Ann. 75-9-403(2). '(A) filing which is made in the proper place in this state continues effective even though the debtor's residence or place of business .”
Hilburn v. S. Trailer Distributors, Inc., 508 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1975). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(2). “[A] filing which is made in the proper place in this state continues effective even though the debtor’s residence or place of business .”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-403(3) — 1 case
In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985). “The filing requirement is expressly defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1): “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this chapter.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-403(4) — 2 cases
In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985). “The filing requirement is expressly defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1): “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this chapter.”
Bankrupt Est. v. S. Trailer Distributors, Inc., 508 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1975). “Miss.Code Ann. 75-9-403(2). '(A) filing which is made in the proper place in this state continues effective even though the debtor's residence or place of business .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.