Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-403 (2026)
Agreement not to assert defenses against assignee
✓ current as of July 2026
- (a) In this section, "value" has the meaning provided in Section 75-3-303(a).
- (b) Except as otherwise provided in this section, an agreement between an account debtor and an assignor not to assert against an assignee any claim or defense that the account debtor may have against the assignor is enforceable by an assignee that takes an assignment:
- (1) For value;
- (2) In good faith;
- (3) Without notice of a claim of a property or possessory right to the property assigned; and
- (4) Without notice of a defense or claim in recoupment of the type that may be asserted against a person entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument under Section 75-3-305(a).
- (c) Subsection (b) does not apply to defenses of a type that may be asserted against a holder in due course of a negotiable instrument under Section 75-3-305(b).
- (d) In a consumer transaction, if a record evidences the account debtor's obligation, law other than this article requires that the record include a statement to the effect that the rights of an assignee are subject to claims or defenses that the account debtor could assert against the original obligee, and the record does not include such a statement:
- (1) The record has the same effect as if the record included such a statement; and
- (2) The account debtor may assert against an assignee those claims and defenses that would have been available if the record included such a statement.
- (e) This section is subject to law other than this article which establishes a different rule for an account debtor who is an individual and who incurred the obligation primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
- (f) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d), this section does not displace law other than this article which gives effect to an agreement by an account debtor not to assert a claim or defense against an assignee.
Former 1972 Code § 75-9-403 [Codes, 1942, § 41A:9-403; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 9-403; Laws, 1977, ch. 452, § 26; Laws, 1978, ch. 401, § 8; Laws, 1979, ch. 369; Laws, 1985, ch. 381, § 1; Laws, 1987, ch. 373, eff. 7/1/1987] is now found in comparable provisions enacted at §§ 75-9-515, 75-9-516, 75-9-519, 75-9-522, and 75-9-525 by Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 1. Present § 75-9-403 was derived from former 1972 Code § 75-9-206 [Codes, 1942, § 41A:9-206; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 9-206, eff. 3/31/1968] and was enacted by Laws, 2001, ch. 495, § 1, eff. 1/1/2002.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1975–1986 · leading case: In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985).
In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985). “The filing requirement is expressly defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1): “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this chapter.”
In Re Abell, 66 B.R. 375 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1986). “Upon timely filing of the continuation statement, the effectiveness of the original statement is continued for five (5) years after the last date to which the filing was effective, whereupon it lapses in the same manner as provided in subsection (2) unless another continuation…”
In the Matter of Rex L. Hammons, Bankrupts. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Fedders Fin. Corp., 614 F.2d 399 (5th Cir. 1980). “Under Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403 (Supp. 1979), a financing statement which does not state a maturity date continues to be effective for five years and may be renewed by the creditor for an indefinite number of successive five-year periods.”
Bankrupt Est. v. S. Trailer Distributors, Inc., 508 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1975). “Miss.Code Ann. 75-9-403(2). '(A) filing which is made in the proper place in this state continues effective even though the debtor's residence or place of business .”
Hilburn v. S. Trailer Distributors, Inc., 508 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1975). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(2). “[A] filing which is made in the proper place in this state continues effective even though the debtor’s residence or place of business .”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1) — 1 case
In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985). “The filing requirement is expressly defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1): “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this chapter.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-403(2) — 4 cases
In Re Abell, 66 B.R. 375 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1986). “Upon timely filing of the continuation statement, the effectiveness of the original statement is continued for five (5) years after the last date to which the filing was effective, whereupon it lapses in the same manner as provided in subsection (2) unless another continuation…”
In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985). “The filing requirement is expressly defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1): “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this chapter.”
Bankrupt Est. v. S. Trailer Distributors, Inc., 508 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1975). “Miss.Code Ann. 75-9-403(2). '(A) filing which is made in the proper place in this state continues effective even though the debtor's residence or place of business .”
Hilburn v. S. Trailer Distributors, Inc., 508 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1975). “Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(2). “[A] filing which is made in the proper place in this state continues effective even though the debtor’s residence or place of business .”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-403(3) — 1 case
In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985). “The filing requirement is expressly defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1): “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this chapter.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-9-403(4) — 2 cases
In the Matter of Bufkin Bros., Inc., Bankrupt. Multi-Mart Branch Off., First State Bank v. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp., 757 F.2d 1573 (1st Cir. 1985). “The filing requirement is expressly defined in Miss.Code Ann. § 75-9-403(1): “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this chapter.”
Bankrupt Est. v. S. Trailer Distributors, Inc., 508 F.2d 1323 (5th Cir. 1975). “Miss.Code Ann. 75-9-403(2). '(A) filing which is made in the proper place in this state continues effective even though the debtor's residence or place of business .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.