Repealed by Laws, 1991, ch. 573, § 141, eff. 7/1/1991.
§ 9-13-33. [Codes, 1892, § 736; 1906, § 797; Hemingway's 1917, § 582; 1930, § 725; 1942, § 1640; Laws 1896, ch. 83; 1910, ch. 111; 1926, ch. 156; 1936, ch. 236; 1958, ch. 273; 1962, ch. 305, §§ 1-4; 1964, ch. 325, §§ 1-4; 1971, ch. 442, § 1; 1975, ch. 354, § 1; 1982, ch. 361] § 9-13-35. [Codes, 1930, § 726; 1942, § 1641; Laws, 1926, ch. 156] § 9-13-37. [Codes, 1892, § 736; 1906, § 797; Hemingway's 1917, § 583; 1930, § 727; 1942, § 1642; Laws, 1896, ch. 83; 1910, ch. 111; 1920, ch. 145] § 9-13-39. [Codes 1892, § 736; 1906, § 797; Hemingway's 1917, § 585; 1930, § 728; 1942, § 1643; Laws, 1896, ch. 83; 1910, ch. 111; 1920, ch. 145] § 9-13-41. [Codes, 1892, § 736; 1906, § 797; Hemingway's 1917, § 585; 1930, § 729; 1942, § 1644; Laws, 1896, ch. 83; 1910, ch. 111; 1920, ch. 145; 1950, ch. 350]
Notes of Decisions
City of Mound Bayou v. Roy Collins Const. Co., 457 So. 2d 337 (Miss. 1984).
· cites it 3× “Second, Collins and Freeland argue that the City failed to designate the portions of the proceedings at trial to be transcribed within ten days of the perfection of the appeal as heretofore required by Miss. Code Ann. § 9-13-33 (Supp. 1983). This, too, say Appellees, means that…”
Lanier v. State, 684 So. 2d 93 (Miss. 1996).
“Miss. Code Ann, § 9-13-33(5) (Supp. 1990) ( repealed by 1991 Miss.”
Ross v. State, 603 So. 2d 857 (Miss. 1992).
“103(a)(1) (to allege error in admission of evidence, party must specify the ground for objection on the record); Miss. Code Ann. § 9-13-33 (1972). Similarly, Ross did not object at trial or in a motion for new trial to the alleged prejudice arising out of the photograph of him.”
In Interest of TLC, 566 So. 2d 691 (Miss. 1990).
“The transcript in this case was 104 pages, but the court reporter required a deposit of $400. None of the $400 was refunded to Roy upon completion of the transcript.”
Dorrough v. State, 437 So. 2d 35 (Miss. 1983).
“Miss. Code Ann. § 9-13-33 (3) (1972). We affirm.”
Bennett v. State, 293 So. 2d 1 (Miss. 1974).
“Miss. Code Ann. § 9-13-33 (1972) provides that in all cases in which the trial was noted by the official court reporter, any person desiring to appeal the case shall notify the court reporter in writing within 10 days after adjournment of court of the fact that a copy of the…”
Garrett v. Nix, 431 So. 2d 137 (Miss. 1983).
“Miss.Code Ann. § 9-13-33 (Supp.1982). However, the failure to give such notice is a procedural defect which may be waived if the appellee fails to file a motion to strike the court reporter’s notes within ten days after the record was filed in this Court.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 9-13-33(5) — 2 cases
Lanier v. State, 684 So. 2d 93 (Miss. 1996).
“Miss. Code Ann, § 9-13-33(5) (Supp. 1990) ( repealed by 1991 Miss.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 9-13-33(7) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.