Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 719 - ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS (UNIFORM ACT)
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.240 (2026)

Legal recognition of electronic records, electronic signatures and electronic contracts

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 719.240  Legal recognition of electronic records, electronic signatures and electronic contracts.

      1.  A record or signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form.

      2.  A contract may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because an electronic record was used in its formation.

      3.  If a law requires a record to be in writing, an electronic record satisfies the law.

      4.  If a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law.

      (Added to NRS by 2001, 2716)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2023–2025 · leading case: Jenkins-Naudain v. ABM Indus. Inc., No. 2:22-cv-01826 (D. Nev. July 20, 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Quest Diagnostics Inc. v. Elarja, No. 2:22-cv-00647 (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2023). · cites it 2× “” NRS § 719.240(4); see, e.g., Gonzales v. Sitel Operating Corp.”
Jenkins-Naudain v. ABM Indus. Inc., No. 2:22-cv-01826 (D. Nev. July 20, 2023). · cites it 2× “4 Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.240 (“A 2 record or signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in 3 electronic form” and “[i]f a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law.”
Broadnax v. Lyft, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-00190 (D. Nev. July 8, 2025). · cites it 2× “§ 7001 (a); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.240 . 12 Broadnax also contends that he is exempt from the FAA because he is a “transportation 13 worker.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.240(4): 1 case
Quest Diagnostics Inc. v. Elarja, No. 2:22-cv-00647 (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2023). “” NRS § 719.240(4); see, e.g., Gonzales v. Sitel Operating Corp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.