New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 32A-2-9 (2026)
Taking into custody.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A child may be taken into custody:
A. pursuant to the order of the court issued because a parent, guardian or custodian
fails when requested to bring the child before the court after having promised to do so
when the child was delivered upon release from custody;
B. pursuant to the laws of arrest for commission of a delinquent act; or
C. by a juvenile probation and parole officer proceeding pursuant to the provisions
of Section 32-2-5 [32A-2-5] NMSA 1978.
History: 1978 Comp., § 32A-2-9, enacted by Laws 1993, ch. 77, § 38.
ANNOTATIONS
Decisions under prior law. — In light of the similarity of the provisions, annotations
decided under former Section 32-1-22 NMSA 1978 have been included in the
annotations to this section.
Taking juvenile into custody is not to be termed an arrest. 1960 Op. Att'y Gen. No.
60-166.
Filing of petition necessary before detention. — A juvenile may not be picked up or
detained without some person first having caused to be filed a petition alleging the facts
causing the juvenile to come within the purview of the Juvenile (now Children's) Code,
and then only upon order of the court. 1962 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 62-32.
Police not prevented from taking juvenile while upon school premises. — The
statutes governing the duties of teachers, county boards of education, county school
superintendents and the state board of education [public education department] do not
impose the obligation or grant the power to prevent the police taking juveniles into
custody while upon school premises. 1960 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 60-166 (see 1964 Op.
Att'y Gen. No 64-56).
Officers of the police, sheriff's department or juvenile (now children's) court have
authority to take children into custody while they are on school grounds for the purpose
of questioning. 1960 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 60-166 (see 1964 Op. Att'y Gen. No 64-56).
Circumstances where officer cannot detain juvenile. — A law enforcement officer
cannot detain or pick up a juvenile while on school grounds or any where else for the
purpose, for instance, of questioning concerning an offense in which the juvenile may
be implicated in the absence of a warrant or circumstances or surroundings which
indicate that the juvenile's welfare is endangered, or in the absence of the juvenile being
found violating some statute or ordinance. 1964 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 64-56.
Police may not "pick up" juvenile probation violators on orders of probation
officers. — Municipal police officers may not pick up delinquent children for suspected
probation violations pursuant to "pick up" orders issued by juvenile probation officers
since such orders are not warrants, directives of a law enforcement official or valid
process of the court. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-01.
Detention until bond posted violates provisions. — The action of the police, acting
unilaterally in detaining a child in jail for violating a city's curfew ordinance until his
parents post bond, is contrary to the Children's Code. 1975 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 75-58.
Extradition of juveniles from another state. 1973 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 73-14 (see now
Section 32A-10-1 NMSA 1978).
Law reviews. — For article, "Child Welfare Under the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978:
A New Mexico Focus," see 10 N.M.L. Rev. 413 (1980).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 47 Am. Jur. 2d Juvenile Courts and
Delinquent and Dependent Children § 62 et seq.
Power of court or other public agency to order medical treatment for child over parental
objections not based on religious grounds, 97 A.L.R.3d 421.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1999–2013 · leading case: Am. Civil Liberties Union v. City of Albuquerque, 992 P.2d 866 (N.M. 1999).
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. City of Albuquerque, 992 P.2d 866 (N.M. 1999). “arantees of Article II of the New Mexico Constitution because it does not provide a mechanism for judicial review of any arrest or detention of the children; and (2) the Curfew is preempted by the Children's Code in that a child may only be taken into custody pursuant to a court…”
G.M. ex rel. B.M. v. Casalduc, 982 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (D.N.M. 2013). “” NMSA § 32A-2-9, 32A-2-3. Once a child is taken into custody, an officer has six options, one of which is to deliver the child to a detention facility certified by the Children, Youth and Families Department.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.