New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 33-2-36 (2026)

Forfeiture of earned meritorious deductions.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A. Meritorious deductions earned by a prisoner may be forfeited in an amount up to
ninety days for two or more misconduct violations. Meritorious deductions earned by a
prisoner may be forfeited in an amount in excess of ninety days for a major conduct
violation. Forfeitures of meritorious deductions of up to ninety days shall only proceed
upon the recommendation of the classification supervisor and final approval by the
warden or the warden's designee. Forfeitures of meritorious deductions in an amount in
excess of ninety days shall only proceed upon the recommendation of the classification
supervisor and the warden or the warden's designee and final approval of the director of
the adult institutions division of the corrections department or the director's designee.
The secretary of corrections may review and revise any decision regarding the forfeiture
of meritorious deductions.

   B. The provisions of this section also apply to the forfeiture of earned meritorious
deductions for a prisoner confined in a:

       (1)    federal or out-of-state correctional facility; or

      (2)     correctional facility in New Mexico operated by a private company
pursuant to a contract with the corrections department.

History: 1978 Comp., § 33-2-36, enacted by Laws 1988, ch. 78, § 6; 1999, ch. 238, § 2;
2006, ch. 82, § 2.

                                      ANNOTATIONS

Repeals and reenactments. — Laws 1988, ch. 78, § 6 repealed 33-2-36 NMSA 1978,
as amended by Laws 1977, ch. 257, § 78, relating to the forfeiture of earned meritorious
deductions by prison inmates, and enacted a new section, effective July 1, 1990.

Cross references. — For applicability of Laws 1988, ch. 78, see 33-2-49 NMSA 1978.

The 2006 amendment, effective July 1, 2006, changed "committee" to "supervisor";
changed "warden" to "warden or the warden’s designee"; and changed "corrections
department" to "corrections department or the director’s designee" in Subsection A.
The 1999 amendment, effective July 1, 1999, rewrote the section, which formerly read:
"Any accrued deductions may be forfeited by the convict for any major conduct violation
upon the recommendation of the classification committee, approval by the warden and
final approval by the secretary of corrections."

Forfeiture of credits. — Section 33-2-34 NMSA 1978 and this section confer an
entitlement to good-time credits, and this entitlement may be divested only when the
statutory and administrative procedures relating to those credits have been followed.
Brooks v. Shanks, 1994-NMSC-113, 118 N.M. 716, 885 P.2d 637.

The language in 33-2-34 NMSA 1978 and in this section gives prisoners the right not to
be subjected to a forfeiture or termination of good-time credits unless the appropriate
procedures are followed. If those procedures are circumvented, a due process violation
occurs. Brooks v. Shanks, 1994-NMSC-113, 118 N.M. 716, 885 P.2d 637.

Continuous sentence provision not limited to "good time" situations. — The
obvious intent of the sections of the 1889 law was to provide for the reduction of a
sentence because of "good time." In so providing, § 49, the present 33-2-39 NMSA
1978 stated that separate sentences were to be construed as one continuous sentence.
However, the statute is not limited to "good time" situations; it is general in its effect and
applies in considering eligibility for parole under 31-21-10 NMSA 1978. Deats v. State,
1972-NMCA-155, 84 N.M. 405, 503 P.2d 1183.

When conduct warrants, "good time" may be forfeited and parolee returned. —
"Good time" earned may be canceled under this section at any time prior to the service
of sentence. If prior to that date a parolee's conduct warrants forfeiture of "good time"
earned, a warrant may be issued under the procedure set out in 31-21-14 NMSA 1978
to return that convict to the penitentiary even though it is proposed to return him
subsequent to the date when his original parole agreement indicates that the sentence
imposed would have been served. 1956 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 56-6378.

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Withdrawal, forfeiture, modification or
denial of good time allowance to prisoner, 95 A.L.R.2d 1265.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: Brooks v. Shanks, 885 P.2d 637 (N.M. 1994).
Brooks v. Shanks, 885 P.2d 637 (N.M. 1994). · cites it 4× “] The other relevant section, Section 33-2-36 (“Forfeiture of earned deductions”), states that “[a]ny accrued deductions may be forfeited by the convict for any major conduct violation upon the recommendation of the classification committee, approval by the warden and final…”
State v. Loretto, 147 P.3d 1138 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “' See NMSA 1978, § 33-2-34(A) (1999) (amended 2006) (explaining the thirty-day maximum credit for a nonviolent offense and the maximum of a four-day credit per month if the crime is a serious violent offense); NMSA 1978, §§ 33-2-36 to -38 (1999) (amended 2006).”
State v. Montano, 517 P.3d 267 (N.M. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “Its use apprised the Legislature that offenders convicted of second degree homicide by vehicle would, under the amended version of Section 66-8-101, be eligible to receive good time credit under the EMDA and presumably alerted the Legislature of the potential need to examine the…”
State v. Cates, 523 P.3d 570 (N.M. 2022). · cites it 2× “We have recognized that Section 33-2-34 and NMSA 1978, Section 33-2-36 (1999, amended 2006), pertaining to forfeiture of earned meritorious deductions, create a statutory entitlement for due process purposes, and a prisoner’s meritorious deductions, once earned, may not “be…”
Brown v. Ulibarri, 298 F. App'x 746 (10th Cir. 2008). “See generally N.M. Stat. Ann. § 33-2-36 (permitting forfeiture of good time credits for misconduct violations).”
Bird v. Bowing (D.N.M. 2020). · cites it 8× “Bird also argues that the forfeiture of all of his good time credits exceeded the amount allowed by NMSA 1978, § 33-2-36. Section 33-2-36 provides: A.”
State v. Montano (N.M. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “Its use apprised the Legislature that offenders convicted of second degree homicide by vehicle would, under the amended version of Section 66-8-101, be eligible to receive good time credit under 12 the EMDA and presumably alerted the Legislature of the potential need to examine…”
State v. Cates (N.M. 2022). · cites it 2× “We have recognized that Section 33-2-34 and NMSA 1978, 17 Section 33-2-36 (1999, amended 2006), pertaining to forfeiture of earned 18 meritorious deductions, create a statutory entitlement for due process purposes, and 19 a prisoner’s meritorious deductions, once earned, may not…”
— N.M. Stat. § 33-2-36(A) — 1 case
Bird v. Bowing (D.N.M. 2020). “Bird also argues that the forfeiture of all of his good time credits exceeded the amount allowed by NMSA 1978, § 33-2-36. Section 33-2-36 provides: A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.