New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Penal Law § 220.75 (2026)
Unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine in the first degree
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 220.75 Unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine in the first degree. A person is guilty of unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine in the first degree when such person commits the crime of unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine in the second degree, as defined in subdivision one of section 220.74 of this article, after having previously been convicted within the preceding five years of unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine in the third degree, as defined in section 220.73, unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine in the second degree, as defined in section 220.74 of this article, or unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine in the first degree, as defined in this section. Unlawful manufacturer of methamphetamine in the first degree is a class B felony.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2013–2016 · leading case: People v. Boula, 106 A.D.3d 1371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013).
People v. Boula, 106 A.D.3d 1371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). “Rather, the factual allegations—that “defendant did agree with [another] to unlawfully manufacture, prepare or produce methamphetamine”—are taken from count 2 of the indictment, which charged the class D felony of unlawful manufacturing of methamphetamine in the third degree…”
Casterline, III, Richard D., People v., 138 A.D.3d 1498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). “Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his guilty plea of unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine in the first degree (Penal Law § 220.75) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 220.”
People v. Boula, 106 A.D.3d 1371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). “Rather, the factual allegations—that “defendant did agree with [another] to unlawfully manufacture, prepare or produce methamphetamine”—are taken from count 2 of the indictment, which charged the class D felony of unlawful manufacturing of methamphetamine in the third degree…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.