Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 144.140

Rules

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      144.140 Rules. (1) The State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision may adopt rules to carry out its responsibilities under the sentencing guidelines system.

      (2) The board shall comply with the rulemaking provisions of ORS chapter 183 in the adoption, amendment or repeal of rules pursuant to ORS 144.125, 144.130, 144.395 and 144.780 to 144.791 or this section. [1977 c.372 §17; 1989 c.790 §27b]

 

      144.175 [1973 c.694 §4; repealed by 1977 c.372 §18]

 

      144.180 [1973 c.694 §5; repealed by 1977 c.372 §18]

 

      144.183 [Repealed by 1974 c.36 §28]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2006–2017 · leading case: Engweiler v. Board of Parole
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Engweiler v. Board of Parole (2006) or “120 but, instead, pursuant to regulations that it had adopted earlier that year, on the recommendation of the Attorney General and under the board’s rulemaking authority in ORS 144.140(1) (board has authority to “adopt rules to carry out its responsibilities under the sentencing…”
State v. Richards (2017) or “ORS 144.140. And the board has adopted extensive administrative rules, including those concerning the imposition of sanctions for violation of post-prison supervision conditions.”
State v. Richards (2017) or “ORS 144.140. And the board has adopted extensive administrative rules, including those concerning the imposition of sanctions for violation of post-prison supervision conditions.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 144.140(1) — 1 case
Engweiler v. Board of Parole (2006) or “120 but, instead, pursuant to regulations that it had adopted earlier that year, on the recommendation of the Attorney General and under the board’s rulemaking authority in ORS 144.140(1) (board has authority to “adopt rules to carry out its responsibilities under the sentencing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.