Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 144.130 (2026)
Prisoner to have access to written materials considered at hearings or interviews; access procedures
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
144.130 Prisoner to have access to written materials considered at hearings or interviews; access procedures. (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of ORS 179.495, prior to a parole hearing or other personal interview, each prisoner shall have access to the written materials which the board shall consider with respect to the release of the prisoner on parole, with the exception of materials exempt from disclosure under ORS 192.355 (5).
(2) The board and the Director of the Department of Corrections shall jointly adopt procedures for a prisoner’s access to written materials pursuant to this section. [1977 c.372 §8; 1987 c.320 §54; 1997 c.825 §2]
Note: See note under 144.110.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Black v. Bd. of Parole, 575 P.3d 148 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
Black v. Bd. of Parole, 575 P.3d 148 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “Cite as 341 Or App 524 (2025) 547 respect to release on parole, ORS 144.130 (1995), amended by Or Laws 1997, ch 825, § 2; requiring the board to state in writing the basis of its decision after an exit interview, ORS 144.”
Maimon v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 909 P.2d 874 (Or. Ct. App. 1995). “ORS 144.130(1) provides: *331 “When the Board denies disclosure of information to a prisoner, the Board must enter into the record a written statement of the reasons for denial which only the Attorney General and the courts may review.”
Fisher/Gordon v. Bd. of Parole, 245 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “502(5) provides an exemption for “[i]nformation or records of the Department of Corrections, including the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, to the extent that disclosure would interfere with the rehabilitation of a person in custody of the department or…”
Fisher/Gordon v. Bd. of Parole, 245 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “502(5) provides an exemption for "[i]nformation or records of the Department of Corrections, including the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, to the extent that disclosure would interfere with the rehabilitation of a person in custody of the department or…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 144.130(1): 3 cases
Maimon v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 909 P.2d 874 (Or. Ct. App. 1995). “ORS 144.130(1) provides: *331 “When the Board denies disclosure of information to a prisoner, the Board must enter into the record a written statement of the reasons for denial which only the Attorney General and the courts may review.”
Fisher/Gordon v. Bd. of Parole, 245 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “502(5) provides an exemption for “[i]nformation or records of the Department of Corrections, including the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, to the extent that disclosure would interfere with the rehabilitation of a person in custody of the department or…”
Fisher/Gordon v. Bd. of Parole, 245 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “502(5) provides an exemption for "[i]nformation or records of the Department of Corrections, including the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, to the extent that disclosure would interfere with the rehabilitation of a person in custody of the department or…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 144.130(2): 1 case
Maimon v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 909 P.2d 874 (Or. Ct. App. 1995). “ORS 144.130(1) provides: *331 “When the Board denies disclosure of information to a prisoner, the Board must enter into the record a written statement of the reasons for denial which only the Attorney General and the courts may review.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.