Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 192.210 (2026)

Definitions for ORS 192.210 and 192.220

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      192.210 Definitions for ORS 192.210 and 192.220. As used in ORS 192.210 and 192.220, unless the context requires otherwise:

      (1) “Issuing agency” means:

      (a) Every state officer, board, commission, department, institution, branch or agency of state government whose costs are paid from public funds and includes the Legislative Assembly, the officers and committees thereof, and the courts and the officers and committees thereof; or

      (b) Any county, special district, school district or public or quasi-public corporation.

      (2) “Printing” includes any form of reproducing written material.

      (3) “Report” means any report or other publication of an issuing agency that is required by law to be submitted to the public or to a receiving agency.

      (4) “Receiving agency” means any state officer or state board, commission, department, institution or agency or branch of government that is required by law to receive any report from an issuing agency. If the branch of government is the Legislative Assembly, the receiving agency is the Legislative Administration Committee and if the branch is the judicial branch, the receiving agency is the Supreme Court. [1969 c.456 §1; 1971 c.638 §11]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: Hood Tech. Corp. v. Oregon Occupational Saf. & Health Div., 7 P.3d 564 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hood Tech. Corp. v. Oregon Occupational Saf. & Health Div., 7 P.3d 564 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). “When such a request has been made, neither a written complaint from an employee, or representative of the employee, nor a memorandum containing the identity of a complainant shall be construed as a public record under ORS 192.210 to 192.500 and 192.610 to 192.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.