Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.090

Definitions for ORS 659A.090 to 659A.099

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      659A.090 Definitions for ORS 659A.090 to 659A.099. As used in ORS 659A.090 to 659A.099:

      (1) Notwithstanding ORS 659A.001, “employee” means an individual who performs services for compensation for an employer for an average of at least 20 hours per week. “Employee” includes all individuals employed at any site owned or operated by an employer, but does not include independent contractors.

      (2) Notwithstanding ORS 659A.001, “employer” means:

      (a) A person, firm, corporation, partnership, legal representative or other business entity that engages in any business, industry, profession or activity in this state and that employs 25 or more persons in the State of Oregon for each working day during each of 20 or more calendar workweeks in the year in which leave is taken under ORS 659A.093 or the year immediately preceding the year in which the leave is to be taken;

      (b) The state, and a department, agency, board or commission of the state; and

      (c) A local government, including, but not limited to, a county, city, town, municipal corporation, independent public corporation or political subdivision of the state.

      (3) “Period of military conflict” means a period of war:

      (a) Declared by the United States Congress;

      (b) Declared by executive order of the President of the United States; or

      (c) In which a reserve component of the Armed Forces of the United States is ordered to active duty pursuant to Title 32 of the United States Code or section 12301 or 12302 of Title 10 of the United States Code. [2009 c.559 §3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2019–2019 · leading case: Burley v. Clackamas Cnty.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Burley v. Clackamas Cnty. (2019) orctapp · cites it 2× “090(2) (specially defining "employer" for purposes of ORS 659A.090 to 659A.099 ); ORS 659A.106 (explaining that "[t]he requirements of ORS 659A.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.090(2) — 1 case
Burley v. Clackamas Cnty. (2019) orctapp “090(2) (specially defining "employer" for purposes of ORS 659A.090 to 659A.099 ); ORS 659A.106 (explaining that "[t]he requirements of ORS 659A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.