Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 677.425 (2026)

Confidential information; immunity

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      677.425 Confidential information; immunity. (1) Any information that the Oregon Medical Board obtains pursuant to ORS 677.200, 677.205 or 677.410 to 677.425 is confidential as provided under ORS 676.175.

      (2) Any person who reports or provides information to the board under ORS 677.205 and 677.410 to 677.425 and who provides information in good faith shall not be subject to an action for civil damages as a result thereof. [1975 c.796 §8; 1983 c.486 §44; 1989 c.830 §29; 1991 c.485 §7; 1997 c.791 §21]

 

      677.435 [1977 c.448 §§2,3,4; 1981 c.339 §4; repealed by 1987 c.774 §61]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1978–1999 · leading case: Spray v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 624 P.2d 125 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Spray v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 624 P.2d 125 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “13 The Board argues that ORS 677.425(1) allows the Board to hold a closed hearing.”
Johnson v. Eugene Emergency Physicians, P.C., 974 P.2d 803 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “We likewise reject plaintiff s contention that ORS 677.425 and ORS 677.335 prohibit the dismissal sanction imposed here.”
Stalder v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 588 P.2d 659 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). “ORS 677.425(1), the statute to which the Board’s attorney was apparently referring, provides: "Any information provided to the Board pursuant to ORS 677.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 677.425(1): 2 cases
Spray v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 624 P.2d 125 (Or. Ct. App. 1981). “13 The Board argues that ORS 677.425(1) allows the Board to hold a closed hearing.”
Stalder v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 588 P.2d 659 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). “ORS 677.425(1), the statute to which the Board’s attorney was apparently referring, provides: "Any information provided to the Board pursuant to ORS 677.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.