R.I. Gen. Laws
Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10 (2026)

Powers of the director

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In addition to exercising the powers and performing the duties, which are otherwise given to the director by law, the director of the department of corrections shall:

(1) Designate, establish, maintain, and administer those state correctional facilities that the director deems necessary, and may discontinue the use of those state correctional facilities that the director deems appropriate for that action;

(2) Maintain security, safety, and order at all state correctional facilities, utilize the resources of the department to prevent escapes from any state correctional facility, take all necessary precautions to prevent the occurrence or spread of any disorder, riot, or insurrection of any state correctional facility, including, but not limited to, the development, planning, and coordination of emergency riot procedures, and take suitable measures for the restoration of order;

(3) Establish and enforce standards for all state correctional facilities;

(4) Supervise and/or approve the administration by the assistant directors of the department;

(5) Manage, direct, and supervise the operations of the department;

(6) Direct employees in the performance of their official duties;

(7) Hire, promote, transfer, assign, and retain employees and suspend, demote, discharge, or take other necessary disciplinary action;

(8) Maintain the efficiency of the operations of the department;

(9) Determine the methods, means, and personnel by which those operations of the department are to be conducted;

(10) Relieve employees from duties because of lack of work or for other legitimate reasons;

(11) Establish, maintain, and administer programs, including, but not limited to, education, training, and employment, of persons committed to the custody of the department, designed as far as practicable to prepare and assist each person to assume the responsibilities and exercise the rights of a citizen of this state;

(12) Establish a system of classification of persons committed to the custody of the department for the purpose of developing programs for each person. In order to effectively develop an individualized program for each sentenced inmate that will address each offender’s individual treatment and rehabilitative needs, the department of corrections is authorized to receive, with the express consent of the inmate, and upon request to the department of children, youth and families, the offender’s juvenile arrest and/or adjudication records. Information related to the juvenile’s family members and other third parties, excluding law enforcement personnel, shall be redacted from the records provided prior to their release to the department. The records will be disclosed to only those department personnel directly responsible for, and only for the purpose of, developing the individualized program for the offender;

(13) Determine at the time of commitment, and from time to time thereafter, the custody requirements and program needs of each person committed to the custody of the department and assign or transfer those persons to appropriate facilities and programs;

(14) Establish training programs for employees of the department, including the use of an application system for the department’s correctional officer training academy that leverages other law enforcement entity recruiting and the establishment of any fee associated with such system, provided that a state application process compliant with § 28-6.3-1 also be provided;

(15) Investigate grievances and inquire into alleged misconduct within the department;

(16) Maintain adequate records of persons committed to the custody of the department;

(17) Establish and maintain programs of research, statistics, and planning, and conduct studies relating to correctional programs and responsibilities of the department;

(18) Utilize, as far as practicable, the services and resources of specialized community agencies and other local community groups in the development of programs, recruitment of volunteers, and dissemination of information regarding the work and needs of the department;

(19) Make and enter into any contracts and agreements necessary or incidental to the performance of the duties and execution of the powers of the department, including, but not limited to, contracts to render services to committed offenders, and to provide for training or education for correctional officers and staff;

(20) Seek to develop civic interest in the work of the department and educate the public to the needs and goals of the corrections process;

(21) Expend annually in the exercise of the director’s powers, performance of the director’s duties, and for the necessary operations of the department those sums that may be appropriated by the general assembly;

(22) Make and promulgate necessary rules and regulations incident to the exercise of the director’s powers and the performance of the director’s duties, including, but not limited to, rules and regulations regarding nutrition, sanitation, safety, discipline, recreation, religious services, communication, and visiting privileges, classification, education, training, employment, care, and custody for all persons committed to correctional facilities;

(23) Make and promulgate regulations to provide:

(i) Written notice to licensed nursing facilities, licensed assisted-living residences, and housing for the elderly whenever a person seeking to reside in one of these facilities or residences is being released on parole for any of the following offenses: murder, voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter, first-degree sexual assault, second-degree sexual assault, third-degree sexual assault, assault on persons sixty (60) years of age or older, assault with intent to commit specified felonies (murder, robbery, rape, or burglary), felony assault, patient abuse, neglect or mistreatment of patients, burglary, first degree arson, felony larceny, or robbery;

(ii) A risk assessment process to identify and recommend safety or security measures necessary for the protection of other residents or clients, including whether the parolee should be prohibited from residing in any such facility or residence or segregated from other residents or clients to protect the security and safety of other residents;

(iii) The written notice to licensed nursing facilities, assisted living residences, or housing for the elderly shall include charge information and disposition about the offense for which the resident or client has been paroled, contact information for the resident’s or client’s parole supervisor, a copy of the risk assessment and recommendations, if any, regarding safety and security measures. A copy of the written notice shall be provided to the parolee; and

(iv) A process for notifying the appropriate state regulatory agency and the state long-term care ombudsman whenever notice as required in subsection (23)(i) of this section has been given;

(24) Notwithstanding the enumeration of the powers of the director as set forth in this section, and notwithstanding any other provision of the general laws, the validity and enforceability of the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement shall not be contested, affected, or diminished, nor shall any arbitration award be vacated, remanded or set aside on the basis of an alleged conflict with this section or with any other provision of the general laws.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2024 · leading case: State of Rhode Island, Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 64 A.3d 734 (R.I. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Rhode Island, Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 64 A.3d 734 (R.I. 2013). · cites it 14× “It also asserted that the grievance was not rendered inarbitrable by virtue of any provision of § 42-56-10 or the management rights clause of the CBA.”
State of Rhode Island Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 115 A.3d 924 (R.I. 2015). · cites it 23× “The DOC argued that the arbitrator exceeded his powers by substituting his judgment for that of the director of the DOC and that the trial justice was not precluded from vacating the award due to a recent amendment to G.L.1956 § 42-56-10, (P.L.2007, ch. 523, § 1), the section of…”
State Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 867 A.2d 823 (R.I. 2005). · cites it 9× “The DOC Code of Ethics and Conduct, promulgated pursuant to the director’s authority under G.L.1956 § 42-56-10, prohibits the following conduct: Section V(F)(7)(a): “Theft.”
Vose v. Broth. of Corr. Officers, 587 A.2d 913 (R.I. 1991). · cites it 8× “1956 (1988 Reenactment) § 42-56-10, and in particular subsection (v), the director adopted the mandatory-involuntary-overtime policy to counter this shortage.”
State Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 725 A.2d 296 (R.I. 1999). · cites it 6× “1997), concluded that “[i]t is the director, not the [defendant], and surely not the arbitrator who must answer under the statute [G.L. 1956 § 42-56-10] for the consequences of a previously convicted and incarcerated officer filling a security post at the adult correctional…”
Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers v. State Dep't of Corr., 707 A.2d 1229 (R.I. 1998). · cites it 2× “The DOC Director’s Lack of Authority to Enter into a Past-Practices Agreement without the Governor’s Approval Although the DOC director is empowered to “[m]ake and enter into any contracts and agreements necessary or incidental to the performance of the duties and execution of…”
State v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 819 A.2d 1286 (R.I. 2003). · cites it 6× “The state counters that the Director of the Department of Corrections has been vested with broad disciplinary powers pursuant to § 42-56-10, 2 including the authority to determine an appropriate disciplin *1289 ary sanction for a correctional officer who is guilty of deliberate…”
State v. Pari, 553 A.2d 135 (R.I. 1989). · cites it 3× “1956 (1988 Reenactment) § 42-56-10. On a more specific level the two enabling statutes authorizing the development of the work-release program give the director the authority to develop and to operate a minimum-security, work-release program pursuant to the guidelines contained…”
Taylor v. Rhode Island, 101 F.3d 780 (1st Cir. 1996). “See also R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(v) (Powers of the director); R.”
Young v. Wall, 359 F. Supp. 2d 84 (D.R.I. 2005). · cites it 2× “As RIDOC’s Director, Wall is statutorily responsible for the management of the Rhode Island prison system, see R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(5) (stating that Director of RIDOC shall “[m]anage, direct and supervise the operations of the department”), and is therefore clearly a state…”
Ferola v. Moran, 622 F. Supp. 814 (D.R.I. 1985). “7, is unmistakable evidence of his knowledge of the abuses that can exist as to the shackling of inmates.”
Pawtucket Sch. Comm. v. Pawtucket Teachers All., 610 A.2d 1104 (R.I. 1992). “1956 (1988 Reenactment) § 42-56-10. 587 A.2d at 913-15 . We concluded it could not.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(14) — 1 case
State of Rhode Island, Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 64 A.3d 734 (R.I. 2013). “It also asserted that the grievance was not rendered inarbitrable by virtue of any provision of § 42-56-10 or the management rights clause of the CBA.”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(2) — 4 cases
State Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 867 A.2d 823 (R.I. 2005). “The DOC Code of Ethics and Conduct, promulgated pursuant to the director’s authority under G.L.1956 § 42-56-10, prohibits the following conduct: Section V(F)(7)(a): “Theft.”
State Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 725 A.2d 296 (R.I. 1999). “1997), concluded that “[i]t is the director, not the [defendant], and surely not the arbitrator who must answer under the statute [G.L. 1956 § 42-56-10] for the consequences of a previously convicted and incarcerated officer filling a security post at the adult correctional…”
State v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 819 A.2d 1286 (R.I. 2003). “The state counters that the Director of the Department of Corrections has been vested with broad disciplinary powers pursuant to § 42-56-10, 2 including the authority to determine an appropriate disciplin *1289 ary sanction for a correctional officer who is guilty of deliberate…”
State of Rhode Island Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 115 A.3d 924 (R.I. 2015). “The DOC argued that the arbitrator exceeded his powers by substituting his judgment for that of the director of the DOC and that the trial justice was not precluded from vacating the award due to a recent amendment to G.L.1956 § 42-56-10, (P.L.2007, ch. 523, § 1), the section of…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(22) — 1 case
Xavier T. Vidot v. Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr. (R.I. 2024).
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(24) — 2 cases
State of Rhode Island, Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 64 A.3d 734 (R.I. 2013). “It also asserted that the grievance was not rendered inarbitrable by virtue of any provision of § 42-56-10 or the management rights clause of the CBA.”
State of Rhode Island Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 115 A.3d 924 (R.I. 2015). “The DOC argued that the arbitrator exceeded his powers by substituting his judgment for that of the director of the DOC and that the trial justice was not precluded from vacating the award due to a recent amendment to G.L.1956 § 42-56-10, (P.L.2007, ch. 523, § 1), the section of…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(5) — 1 case
Young v. Wall, 359 F. Supp. 2d 84 (D.R.I. 2005). “As RIDOC’s Director, Wall is statutorily responsible for the management of the Rhode Island prison system, see R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(5) (stating that Director of RIDOC shall “[m]anage, direct and supervise the operations of the department”), and is therefore clearly a state…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(7) — 2 cases
State Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 867 A.2d 823 (R.I. 2005). “The DOC Code of Ethics and Conduct, promulgated pursuant to the director’s authority under G.L.1956 § 42-56-10, prohibits the following conduct: Section V(F)(7)(a): “Theft.”
State of Rhode Island Dep't of Corr. v. Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers, 115 A.3d 924 (R.I. 2015). “The DOC argued that the arbitrator exceeded his powers by substituting his judgment for that of the director of the DOC and that the trial justice was not precluded from vacating the award due to a recent amendment to G.L.1956 § 42-56-10, (P.L.2007, ch. 523, § 1), the section of…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(c) — 1 case
State v. Pari, 553 A.2d 135 (R.I. 1989). “1956 (1988 Reenactment) § 42-56-10. On a more specific level the two enabling statutes authorizing the development of the work-release program give the director the authority to develop and to operate a minimum-security, work-release program pursuant to the guidelines contained…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(s) — 1 case
Rhode Island Bhd. of Corr. Officers v. State Dep't of Corr., 707 A.2d 1229 (R.I. 1998). “The DOC Director’s Lack of Authority to Enter into a Past-Practices Agreement without the Governor’s Approval Although the DOC director is empowered to “[m]ake and enter into any contracts and agreements necessary or incidental to the performance of the duties and execution of…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(v) — 3 cases
Vose v. Broth. of Corr. Officers, 587 A.2d 913 (R.I. 1991). “1956 (1988 Reenactment) § 42-56-10, and in particular subsection (v), the director adopted the mandatory-involuntary-overtime policy to counter this shortage.”
Taylor v. Rhode Island, 101 F.3d 780 (1st Cir. 1996). “See also R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-56-10(v) (Powers of the director); R.”
Nicholson v. Moran, 835 F. Supp. 692 (D.R.I. 1993).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.