Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-901 (2026)

Liens for child support arrearages

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 300, s 1, eff. 5/5/2017.

Acts 1997 , ch. 551, § 12; 1998, ch. 1098, § 36; 2000, ch. 846, § 32; 2000, ch. 922, § 23; 2001, ch. 447, §§ 16, 17.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1999–2018 · leading case: Bryan v. Leach, 85 S.W.3d 136 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
Bryan v. Leach, 85 S.W.3d 136 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “§ 36-5-103 (court may require bond to secure payment, may sequester certain property, appoint a receiver over assets and income, place a lien on property of obligor); Tenn.”
Kevin Millen v. Raquel Hatter (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-901 (2017). Mr. Millen requested that he be reimbursed a sum of money from the juvenile court and Bank of America and be awarded “$150,000.”
Julia Leach Bryan v. James Leach (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 36-5-103 (court may require bond to secure payment, may sequester certain property, appoint a receiver over assets and income, place a lien on property of obligor); Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-901 et seq. (enforcement of overdue support by department of human services; liens).”
Julia Leach Bryan v. James Leach (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 36-5-103 (court may require bond to secure payment, may sequester certain property, appoint a receiver over assets and income, place a lien on property of obligor); Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-901 et seq. (enforcement of overdue support by department of human services; liens).”
Rhonda Anderson v. Lester Jarrett & Melinda Benson v. Herman Harris (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “The order shall be based upon and issued pursuant to an existing judicial or administrative order which has previously established support under which an arrearage, due to overdue support, as defined in § 36-5-901, has occurred. -2- shall be as ‘otherwise provided by 4-5-322.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.