Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151 (2026)

Parents' liability for support

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1970, ch. 600, § 56; T.C.A., § 37-256; Acts 1995, ch. 504, § 8; 1996, ch. 1079, § 73; 1997, ch. 551, §§ 20, 24, 27, 47, 50, 67; 1998, ch. 1098, §§ 58, 59; 2001, ch. 447, §§ 11, 19.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases, 1997–2018 · leading case: State v. Wilson, 132 S.W.3d 340 (Tenn. 2004).
State v. Wilson, 132 S.W.3d 340 (Tenn. 2004). · cites it 10× “*341 We granted permission to appeal to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-151 bars the State from recovering retroactive child support more than forty-five days prior to the filing of a petition seeking such…”
Kirkpatrick v. O'NEAL, 197 S.W.3d 674 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 4× “This duty was codified in Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-151 (2005) (effective July 1, 2002), which provides for the application of the child support guidelines where the State has custody of a child and seeks support from one or both parents.”
Dept of Human Srvcs. / Dept of Child. Srvcs. v. Debra Wilson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 24× “A hearing was held at which the State contended that an award of retroactive support was proper, citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151 as authority. Both parties agreed that the child was voluntarily placed into DCS’s custody.”
Eidson v. Tennessee Dep't of Child.'s Servs., 477 F. Supp. 2d 923 (E.D. Tenn. 2007). “§ 37-1-151 provides that a juvenile court may immediately remove a child from the custody of a parent only upon a finding, based upon a sworn petition or sworn testimony, that there is a probable cause to believe that the child is subject to an immediate threat to the child's…”
Dept of Human Srvcs. / Dept of Child. Srvcs. v. Debra Wilson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 10× “Although the court did not set a hearing “for the purpose of establishing support” at the time of the custody hearing, as required by Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151 (b)(2), the clerk did not notify the Title IV-D office or the parents of a such a hearing, as required by Tenn.”
In Re Gabriel B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “The trial court issued a protective custody order on December 4, 2015, finding Gabriel dependent and neglected and notifying the parents of their obligation to provide child support for Gabriel in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151 . On December 28, 2015, a DCS family…”
Matthew Brock Hance v. Danielle Smith Hance (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “Moreover, child support determinations are a component of dependency and neglect proceedings pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151 , which provides: -4- In any case in which the court shall find a child dependent and neglected .”
State of Tennessee O/B/O Juanita Whitehead v. Mattie (Whitehead) Thompson (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151 (b)(2). The outcome of this appeal hinges on the answers to the following two questions: did the juvenile court have jurisdiction to order Ms.”
In Re H.A.L. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151 (Supp. 2004) (permitting juvenile courts to require parents to support children in the State’s custody if the parents are able to contribute to the support of the child).”
In Re M.j.m., Jr., L.p.m., & C.A.O.M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151 (Supp. 2004) (permitting juvenile courts to require parents to support children in the State’s custody if the parents are able to contribute to the support of the child).”
State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Daniel E. Blandford v. Tanya L. Blandford (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Following a hearing conducted January 12, 2015, the trial court found that, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 37-1-151(a), the court had properly assumed jurisdiction over child support during the dependency and neglect proceedings.”
In re: Stephanie Ann Linville, a Minor (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 37-1-151 (Supp. 2000); 36-5- 101(e)(Supp.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151(a) — 1 case
State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Daniel E. Blandford v. Tanya L. Blandford (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Following a hearing conducted January 12, 2015, the trial court found that, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 37-1-151(a), the court had properly assumed jurisdiction over child support during the dependency and neglect proceedings.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151(b) — 1 case
State v. Wilson, 132 S.W.3d 340 (Tenn. 2004). “*341 We granted permission to appeal to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-151 bars the State from recovering retroactive child support more than forty-five days prior to the filing of a petition seeking such…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151(b)(2) — 1 case
Kirkpatrick v. O'NEAL, 197 S.W.3d 674 (Tenn. 2006). “This duty was codified in Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-151 (2005) (effective July 1, 2002), which provides for the application of the child support guidelines where the State has custody of a child and seeks support from one or both parents.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151(b)(4)(A) — 1 case
Dept of Human Srvcs. / Dept of Child. Srvcs. v. Debra Wilson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “A hearing was held at which the State contended that an award of retroactive support was proper, citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-151 as authority. Both parties agreed that the child was voluntarily placed into DCS’s custody.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.