Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2006 (2026)

"Net earnings" and "net loss" defined

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 377, s 17, eff. 1/1/2024, app. to tax years ending on or after December 31, 2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 377, s 16, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 377, s 15, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 377, s 14, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 377, s 13, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 743, s 1, eff. 3/24/2022.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 154, Secs.s 1, s 2 eff. 4/14/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 306, Secs.s 1, s 2 eff. 5/8/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1011, s 1, Sec.s 2 eff. 5/21/2018.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 514, s 29, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 514, s 28, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 273, s 2, eff. 4/28/2015.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 321, s 8, eff. 5/13/2013.

Acts 1999, ch. 406, § 3; 2000, ch. 982, §§ 8 - 14, 46, 47; 2002, ch. 856, §§ 3a, 3b; 2004, ch. 592, § 5; 2004, ch. 785, § 1; 2004, ch. 835, §§ 1, 2; 2004, ch. 924, §§ 2 - 4; 2005, ch. 98, § 1; 2005, ch. 499, §§ 30 - 34, 64, 76; 2006, ch. 1019, §§ 7, 13 - 18, 28; 2007 , ch. 602, §§ 15-18; 2008 , ch. 1106, §§ 36, 43, 61; 2009 , ch. 530, §§ 3, 4, 30, 32; 2010 , ch. 1134, §§ 7-9, 19; 2011 , ch. 467, §§ 1, 11; 2011 , ch. 508, §§ 22, 23; 2012 , ch. 842, §§ 2-4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2007–2018 · leading case: Kohl'S Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Va. Dep't of Taxation, 810 S.E.2d 891 (Va. 2018).
Kohl'S Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Va. Dep't of Taxation, 810 S.E.2d 891 (Va. 2018). “1-1825, "rulings and administrative interpretations other than those described in subdivisions 2 and 3 shall not be admitted into evidence and shall be accorded no weight." Code § 8.”
Surtees v. VFJ Ventures, Inc., 8 So. 3d 950 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008). “§ 12-6-1130; Tennessee, see Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-2006(b); and Virginia, see Va.”
Kohl's Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Va. Dep't of Taxation, 803 S.E.2d 336 (Va. 2017). “While it is true that the rule of interpretation which permits the courts to look at the practical construction adopted by executive officers is usually applied to cases in which such construction has continued and been acquiesced in for a long period of time[,] .”
Oak Ridge Land Co., LP. v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r Of Revenue For The State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 16× “20 to make the assessment, the plaintiff charged the Rule was inconsistent with the provisions of Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2006 . The Trial Judge held the regulation was in conflict with the code section to the extent that the Rule attempted to restrict the deduction for…”
Hilloak Realty Co. v. Chumley, 233 S.W.3d 816 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 7× “The trial court also found that T.C.A. § 67-4-2006(b)(2)(C) was applicable and Hilloak was entitled to amend its 2003 excise tax return to reflect the higher basis for the purpose of determining whether it was obligated for excise taxes for the year 2003.”
H.J. Heinz Co., L.P. v. Loren L. Chumley, Commissioiner of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “Heinz LP asserted it was entitled to the dividends received deduction under Tennessee Code Annotated § 67-4-2006(b)(2)(A) because HJH One’s “separate existence must be respected.”
EMC Corp. v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Pub. Accounts of the State of Texas & Ken Paxton, Attorney Gen. of the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2015). “, Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2006 (b)(l)) and related- party intangible expense add-backs (see.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2006(b) — 1 case
Surtees v. VFJ Ventures, Inc., 8 So. 3d 950 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008). “§ 12-6-1130; Tennessee, see Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-2006(b); and Virginia, see Va.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2006(b)(2)(A) — 1 case
H.J. Heinz Co., L.P. v. Loren L. Chumley, Commissioiner of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). “Heinz LP asserted it was entitled to the dividends received deduction under Tennessee Code Annotated § 67-4-2006(b)(2)(A) because HJH One’s “separate existence must be respected.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2006(b)(2)(C) — 1 case
Hilloak Realty Co. v. Chumley, 233 S.W.3d 816 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The trial court also found that T.C.A. § 67-4-2006(b)(2)(C) was applicable and Hilloak was entitled to amend its 2003 excise tax return to reflect the higher basis for the purpose of determining whether it was obligated for excise taxes for the year 2003.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2006(b)(2)(c) — 1 case
Hilloak Realty Co. v. Chumley, 233 S.W.3d 816 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The trial court also found that T.C.A. § 67-4-2006(b)(2)(C) was applicable and Hilloak was entitled to amend its 2003 excise tax return to reflect the higher basis for the purpose of determining whether it was obligated for excise taxes for the year 2003.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.