15 U.S.C. § 1681c

Requirements relating to information contained in consumer reports

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Information excluded from consumer reportsExcept as authorized under subsection (b), no consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information:(1) Cases under title 11 or under the Bankruptcy Act that, from the date of entry of the order for relief or the date of adjudication, as the case may be, antedate the report by more than 10 years.(2) Civil suits, civil judgments, and records of arrest that, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven years or until the governing statute of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period.(3) Paid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years.(4) Accounts placed for collection or charged to profit and loss which antedate the report by more than seven years.(5) Any other adverse item of information, other than records of convictions of crimes which antedates the report by more than seven years.(6) The name, address, and telephone number of any medical information furnisher that has notified the agency of its status, unless—(A) such name, address, and telephone number are restricted or reported using codes that do not identify, or provide information sufficient to infer, the specific provider or the nature of such services, products, or devices to a person other than the consumer; or(B) the report is being provided to an insurance company for a purpose relating to engaging in the business of insurance other than property and casualty insurance.(7) With respect to a consumer reporting agency described in section 1681a(p) of this title, any information related to a veteran’s medical debt if the date on which the hospital care, medical services, or extended care services was rendered relating to the debt antedates the report by less than 1 year if the consumer reporting agency has actual knowledge that the information is related to a veteran’s medical debt and the consumer reporting agency is in compliance with its obligation under section 302(c)(5) of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act.(8) With respect to a consumer reporting agency described in section 1681a(p) of this title, any information related to a fully paid or settled veteran’s medical debt that had been characterized as delinquent, charged off, or in collection if the consumer reporting agency has actual knowledge that the information is related to a veteran’s medical debt and the consumer reporting agency is in compliance with its obligation under section 302(c)(5) of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act.(b) Exempted casesThe provisions of paragraphs (1) through (5) of subsection (a) are not applicable in the case of any consumer credit report to be used in connection with—(1) a credit transaction involving, or which may reasonably be expected to involve, a principal amount of $150,000 or more;(2) the underwriting of life insurance involving, or which may reasonably be expected to involve, a face amount of $150,000 or more; or(3) the employment of any individual at an annual salary which equals, or which may reasonably be expected to equal $75,000, or more.(c) Running of reporting period(1) In general

The 7-year period referred to in paragraphs (4) and (6) of subsection (a) shall begin, with respect to any delinquent account that is placed for collection (internally or by referral to a third party, whichever is earlier), charged to profit and loss, or subjected to any similar action, upon the expiration of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the commencement of the delinquency which immediately preceded the collection activity, charge to profit and loss, or similar action.

(2) Effective date

Paragraph (1) shall apply only to items of information added to the file of a consumer on or after the date that is 455 days after September 30, 1996.

(d) Information required to be disclosed(1) Title 11 information

Any consumer reporting agency that furnishes a consumer report that contains information regarding any case involving the consumer that arises under title 11 shall include in the report an identification of the chapter of such title 11 under which such case arises if provided by the source of the information. If any case arising or filed under title 11 is withdrawn by the consumer before a final judgment, the consumer reporting agency shall include in the report that such case or filing was withdrawn upon receipt of documentation certifying such withdrawal.

(2) Key factor in credit score information

Any consumer reporting agency that furnishes a consumer report that contains any credit score or any other risk score or predictor on any consumer shall include in the report a clear and conspicuous statement that a key factor (as defined in section 1681g(f)(2)(B) of this title) that adversely affected such score or predictor was the number of enquiries, if such a predictor was in fact a key factor that adversely affected such score. This paragraph shall not apply to a check services company, acting as such, which issues authorizations for the purpose of approving or processing negotiable instruments, electronic fund transfers, or similar methods of payments, but only to the extent that such company is engaged in such activities.

(e) Indication of closure of account by consumer

If a consumer reporting agency is notified pursuant to section 1681s–2(a)(4) of this title that a credit account of a consumer was voluntarily closed by the consumer, the agency shall indicate that fact in any consumer report that includes information related to the account.

(f) Indication of dispute by consumer

If a consumer reporting agency is notified pursuant to section 1681s–2(a)(3) of this title that information regarding a consumer who 11 So in original. Probably should be “which”. was furnished to the agency is disputed by the consumer, the agency shall indicate that fact in each consumer report that includes the disputed information.

(g) Truncation of credit card and debit card numbers(1) In general

Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, no person that accepts credit cards or debit cards for the transaction of business shall print more than the last 5 digits of the card number or the expiration date upon any receipt provided to the cardholder at the point of the sale or transaction.

(2) Limitation

This subsection shall apply only to receipts that are electronically printed, and shall not apply to transactions in which the sole means of recording a credit card or debit card account number is by handwriting or by an imprint or copy of the card.

(3) Effective dateThis subsection shall become effective—(A) 3 years after December 4, 2003, with respect to any cash register or other machine or device that electronically prints receipts for credit card or debit card transactions that is in use before January 1, 2005; and(B) 1 year after December 4, 2003, with respect to any cash register or other machine or device that electronically prints receipts for credit card or debit card transactions that is first put into use on or after January 1, 2005.(h) Notice of discrepancy in address(1) In general

If a person has requested a consumer report relating to a consumer from a consumer reporting agency described in section 1681a(p) of this title, the request includes an address for the consumer that substantially differs from the addresses in the file of the consumer, and the agency provides a consumer report in response to the request, the consumer reporting agency shall notify the requester of the existence of the discrepancy.

(2) Regulations(A) Regulations required

The Bureau shall,,22 So in original. in consultation with the Federal banking agencies, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Trade Commission,,2 prescribe regulations providing guidance regarding reasonable policies and procedures that a user of a consumer report should employ when such user has received a notice of discrepancy under paragraph (1).

(B) Policies and procedures to be includedThe regulations prescribed under subparagraph (A) shall describe reasonable policies and procedures for use by a user of a consumer report—(i) to form a reasonable belief that the user knows the identity of the person to whom the consumer report pertains; and(ii) if the user establishes a continuing relationship with the consumer, and the user regularly and in the ordinary course of business furnishes information to the consumer reporting agency from which the notice of discrepancy pertaining to the consumer was obtained, to reconcile the address of the consumer with the consumer reporting agency by furnishing such address to such consumer reporting agency as part of information regularly furnished by the user for the period in which the relationship is established.(Pub. L. 90–321, title VI, § 605, as added Pub. L. 91–508, title VI, § 601, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1129; amended Pub. L. 95–598, title III, § 312(b), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2676; Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, § 2406(a)–(e)(1), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–434, 3009–435; Pub. L. 105–347, § 5, Nov. 2, 1998, 112 Stat. 3211; Pub. L. 108–159, title I, § 113, title II, § 212(d), title III, § 315, title IV, § 412(b), (c), title VIII, § 811(c)(1), (2)(A), Dec. 4, 2003, 117 Stat. 1959, 1977, 1996, 2002, 2011; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, § 1088(a)(2)(D), (5), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2087; Pub. L. 115–174, title III, § 302(b)(2), May 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 1333.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Bankruptcy Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), was act July 1, 1898, ch. 541, 30 Stat. 544, which was classified to section 1 et seq. of former Title 11, Bankruptcy, prior to its repeal by Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2549, section 101 of which enacted revised Title 11.

Section 302(c)(5) of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(7), (8), is section 302(c)(5) of Pub. L. 115–174, which is set out as a note below.

Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a)(7), (8). Pub. L. 115–174 added pars. (7) and (8).

2010—Subsec. (h)(2)(A). Pub. L. 111–203, § 1088(a)(5), substituted “, in consultation with the Federal banking agencies, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Trade Commission,” for “with respect to the entities that are subject to their respective enforcement authority under section 1681s of this title”.

Pub. L. 111–203, § 1088(a)(2)(D), substituted “The Bureau shall” for “The Federal banking agencies, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Commission shall jointly”.

2003—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 108–159, § 811(c)(1), substituted “(1) Cases” for “(1) cases”.

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 108–159, § 811(c)(2)(A), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 105–347, § 5(1). See 1998 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (a)(6). Pub. L. 108–159, § 412(b), added par. (6).

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–159, § 412(c), substituted “The provisions of paragraphs (1) through (5) of subsection (a)” for “The provisions of subsection (a)” in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 108–159, § 212(d), designated existing provisions as par. (1), inserted heading, and added par. (2).

Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 108–159, § 113, added subsec. (g).

Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 108–159, § 315, added subsec. (h).

1998—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 105–347, § 5(1), as amended by Pub. L. 108–159, § 811(c)(2)(A), substituted “Civil suits, civil judgments, and records of arrest that” for “Suits and judgments which”.

Subsec. (a)(5), (6). Pub. L. 105–347, § 5(2)–(4), redesignated par. (6) as (5), inserted “, other than records of convictions of crimes” after “of information”, and struck out former par. (5) which read as follows: “Records of arrest, indictment, or conviction of crime which, from date of disposition, release, or parole, antedate the report by more than seven years.”

1996—Pub. L. 104–208, § 2406(e)(1), amended section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–208, § 2406(a)(1), inserted heading.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–208, § 2406(a)(2), substituted “$150,000” for “$50,000” in pars. (1) and (2) and “$75,000” for “$20,000” in par. (3).

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–208, § 2406(b), added subsec. (c).

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–208, § 2406(c), added subsec. (d).

Subsecs. (e), (f). Pub. L. 104–208, § 2406(d), added subsecs. (e) and (f).

1978—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 95–598 substituted “cases under title 11 or under the Bankruptcy Act that, from the date of entry of the order for relief or the date of adjudication, as the case may be, antedate the report by more than 10 years” for “Bankruptcies which, from date of adjudication of the most recent bankruptcy, antedate the report by more than fourteen years”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–174 effective 1 year after May 24, 2018, see section 302(e) of Pub. L. 115–174, set out as a note under section 1681a of this title.

Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Effective Date of 2003 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–159 subject to joint regulations establishing effective dates as prescribed by Federal Reserve Board and Federal Trade Commission, except as otherwise provided, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–159, set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.

Amendment by section 412 of Pub. L. 108–159 effective at end of 15-month period beginning on Dec. 4, 2003, see section 412(g) of Pub. L. 108–159, set out as a note under section 1681b of this title.

Pub. L. 108–159, title VIII, § 811(c)(2)(B), Dec. 4, 2003, 117 Stat. 2011, provided that: “The amendment made by subparagraph (A) [amending this section] shall be deemed to have the same effective date as section 5(1) of Public Law 105–347 (112 Stat. 3211) [see Effective Date of 1998 Amendment note below].”

Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–347 deemed to have same effective date as amendments made by section 2403 of Pub. L. 104–208, see section 7 of Pub. L. 105–347, set out as a note under section 1681a of this title.

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–208 effective 365 days after Sept. 30, 1996, with special rule for early compliance, see section 2420 of Pub. L. 104–208, set out as a note under section 1681a of this title.

Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–598 effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 402(a) of Pub. L. 95–598, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.

Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of one hundred and eighty days following Oct. 26, 1970, see section 504(d) of Pub. L. 90–321, as added by Pub. L. 91–508, set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.

Verification of Veteran’s Medical Debt

Pub. L. 115–174, title III, § 302(c), May 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 1334, provided that:“(1)Definitions.—For purposes of this subsection—“(A) the term ‘consumer reporting agency’ means a consumer reporting agency described in section 603(p) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a(p)); and“(B) the terms ‘veteran’ and ‘veteran’s medical debt’ have the meanings given those terms in section 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a), as added by subsection (b)(1).“(2)Establishment.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [May 24, 2018], the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish a database to allow consumer reporting agencies to verify whether a debt furnished to a consumer reporting agency is a veteran’s medical debt.“(3)Database features.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall ensure that the database established under paragraph (2), to the extent permitted by law, provides consumer reporting agencies with—“(A) sufficiently detailed and specific information to verify whether a debt being furnished to the consumer reporting agency is a veteran’s medical debt;“(B) access to verification information in a secure electronic format;“(C) timely access to verification information; and“(D) any other features that would promote the efficient, timely, and secure delivery of information that consumer reporting agencies could use to verify whether a debt is a veteran’s medical debt.“(4)Stakeholder input.—Prior to establishing the database for verification under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall publish in the Federal Register a notice and request for comment that solicits input from consumer reporting agencies and other stakeholders.“(5)Verification.—Provided the database established under paragraph (2) is fully functional and the data available to consumer reporting agencies, a consumer reporting agency shall use the database as a means to identify a veteran’s medical debt pursuant to paragraphs (7) and (8) of section 605(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681c(a)), as added by subsection (b)(2).”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 358 cases (112 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: Ehrheart v. Verizon Wireless, 609 F.3d 590 (3rd Cir. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Ehrheart v. Verizon Wireless, 609 F.3d 590 (3rd Cir. 2010). · cites it 11× “al did not remove an expiration date of a credit or debit card from a receipt, but otherwise complied with FACTA: [A]ny person who printed an expiration date on any receipt provided to a consumer cardholder at a point of sale or transaction between December 4, 2004, and the date…”

Katz v. Donna Karan Co., 872 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 2017). · cites it 4× “1952 (codified as amended at 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)). FACTA seeks to reduce the risk of identity theft by, among other things, prohibiting merchants from including more than the last five digits of a customer’s credit card number on a printed receipt.”

Stephanie Daniel v. Nat'l Park Serv., 891 F.3d 762 (9th Cir. 2018). · cites it 7× “NAT’L PARK SERVICE SUMMARY* Fair Credit Reporting Act The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a suit brought pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g), against the National Park Service alleging that the Service violated the Act by failing to…”

Steven Hammer v. Sam's East, Inc., 754 F.3d 492 (8th Cir. 2014). · cites it 15× “(collectively -2- “Sam’s Club”)1 willfully violated a provision of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)(1), which prohibits a person accepting credit or debit cards for a consumer transaction from “print[ing] more than the last five digits…”

Doris Jeffries v. Volume Servs. Am., Inc., 928 F.3d 1059 (D.C. Cir. 2019). · cites it 8× “1952 , 1959-60 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g) ), which prohibits printing "more than the last 5 digits of the card number or the expiration date upon any receipt provided to the cardholder at the point of the sale or transaction.”

Gabriel Moran v. the Screening Pros, 923 F.3d 1208 (9th Cir. 2019). · cites it 8× “Reversing as to the FCRA claims, the panel held that 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a) permits consumer reporting of a criminal charge for only seven years following the date of entry of the charge, rather than the date of disposition.”

Edward Seamans v. Temple Univ., 744 F.3d 853 (3rd Cir. 2014). · cites it 4× “15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(4). Other “adverse item[s] of information,” aside from criminal convictions, also may be reported only for seven years after the adverse event.”

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc., 905 F.3d 1200 (11th Cir. 2018). · cites it 12× “” See 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g); cf. Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.”

Simonoff v. Expedia, Inc., 643 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 6× “15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g). FACTA, then, prohibits merchants from printing credit card expiration dates and non-truncated credit card numbers on “electronically printed” receipts.”

Steven Bassett v. Abm Parking Servs., 883 F.3d 776 (9th Cir. 2018). · cites it 3× “When Steven Bassett used his credit card at an ABM parking garage, he received a receipt displaying the card’s full expiration date—a violation of the requirement that businesses redact certain credit card information on printed receipts.”

Gonzales v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 660 F.3d 1055 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 3× “2001) (citing 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)). As a general practice, Arrow does not report obsolete debts.”

Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Ther Kansas City Landsmen, L.L.C., 592 F. App'x 876 (11th Cir. 2015). · cites it 8× “” To establish a “willful” violation under § 1681n, the class action plaintiffs must show either that the Car Rental Companies knowingly violated FACTA or that they acted in reckless disregard of FACTA’s requirements. See Safeco, 551 U.”

Show all 358 citing cases →

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(1) — 3 cases

Jenkins v. Carco Grp., Inc., 339 F. Supp. 3d 1223 (D. Kan. 2018).

Grijalva v. ADP Screening & Selection Servs. Inc. (D. Ariz. 2024).

Rund (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 2026).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(4) — 1 case

Konig v. Transunion, LLC (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(5) — 1 case

Gambles v. Sterling Infosystems, Inc., 234 F. Supp. 3d 510 (S.D.N.Y. 2017).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a) — 37 cases

Gabriel Moran v. the Screening Pros, 923 F.3d 1208 (9th Cir. 2019). “Reversing as to the FCRA claims, the panel held that 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a) permits consumer reporting of a criminal charge for only seven years following the date of entry of the charge, rather than the date of disposition.”

Gambles v. Sterling Infosystems, Inc., 234 F. Supp. 3d 510 (S.D.N.Y. 2017).

Gonzales v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 660 F.3d 1055 (9th Cir. 2011). “2001) (citing 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)). As a general practice, Arrow does not report obsolete debts.”

Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Keith H. Gill Richard Murkey, 265 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 2001).

Barry Stimpson v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc., 944 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 2019).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(1) — 11 cases

Consum. Data Indus. Assoc. v. Frey, 26 F.4th 1 (1st Cir. 2022).

McPhee v. Chilton Corp., 468 F. Supp. 494 (D. Conn. 1978).

In Re Whitener, 57 B.R. 707 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1986).

In re: Robert C. Keller & Finley Jones Keller (9th Cir. BAP 2017).

Brown v. Pennsylvania Higher Educ. Agency (D.D.C. 2021).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(2) — 16 cases

Haley v. TalentWise, Inc., 9 F. Supp. 3d 1188 (W.D. Wash. 2014).

Serrano v. Sterling Testing Sys., Inc., 557 F. Supp. 2d 688 (E.D. Pa. 2008).

Massey v. On-Site Manager, Inc., 285 F.R.D. 239 (E.D.N.Y 2012).

King v. Gen. Info. Servs., Inc., 903 F. Supp. 2d 303 (E.D. Pa. 2012).

Meuse v. Nat'l P.I. Servs., LLC (D. Mass. 2022).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(3) — 1 case

Wright v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc., 805 F.3d 1232 (10th Cir. 2015).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(4) — 45 cases

Edward Seamans v. Temple Univ., 744 F.3d 853 (3rd Cir. 2014). “15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(4). Other “adverse item[s] of information,” aside from criminal convictions, also may be reported only for seven years after the adverse event.”

Gonzales v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 660 F.3d 1055 (9th Cir. 2011). “2001) (citing 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)). As a general practice, Arrow does not report obsolete debts.”

Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson, 137 S. Ct. 1407 (2017).

Huertas v. Galaxy Asset Mgmt., 641 F.3d 28 (3rd Cir. 2011).

Slick v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, 111 F. Supp. 3d 900 (N.D. Ill. 2015).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(5) — 22 cases

Gabriel Moran v. the Screening Pros, LLC, 25 F.4th 722 (9th Cir. 2022).

Obabueki v. Int'l Bus. MacHines Corp., 145 F. Supp. 2d 371 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).

Wiggins v. Equifax Servs., Inc., 848 F. Supp. 213 (D.D.C. 1993).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(6) — 5 cases

Peters v. St. Joseph Servs. Corp., 74 F. Supp. 3d 847 (S.D. Tex. 2015).

Equifax Servs., Inc. v. Cohen, 420 A.2d 189 (Me. 1980).

Catrone v. Thoroughbred Racing Associations of North Am., Inc., 727 F. Supp. 717 (D. Mass. 1989).

Gabriel Moran v. the Screening Pros (9th Cir. 2019).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(7) — 1 case

Consum. Data Indus. Ass'n v. Frey (D. Me. 2024).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(g) — 1 case

Motor Veh. Operator Info., 72 Pa. D. & C.2d 302 (1975).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(l) — 9 cases

In Re Delores C. Brown, Debtor v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union, 851 F.2d 81 (3rd Cir. 1988).

Keller v. New Penn Fin., LLC (In Re Keller), 568 B.R. 118 (9th Cir. BAP 2017).

In Re Wenk, 296 B.R. 719 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2002).

Poore v. Sterling Testing Sys., Inc., 410 F. Supp. 2d 557 (E.D. Ky. 2006).

Off. of the United States Tr. v. Jones (In Re Alvarado), 363 B.R. 484 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2007).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(b) — 8 cases

Heather Gillespie & Angela Cinson v. Equifax Info. Servs., L.L.C., 484 F.3d 938 (7th Cir. 2007).

Wiggins v. Equifax Servs., Inc., 848 F. Supp. 213 (D.D.C. 1993).

James Greenway v. Info. Dynamics, Ltd., Etc., 524 F.2d 1145 (9th Cir. 1975).

King v. Gen. Info. Servs., Inc., 903 F. Supp. 2d 303 (E.D. Pa. 2012).

Johnson v. Certified Servs., Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2020).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(b)(1) — 3 cases

Hill v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 369 F. Supp. 3d 1324 (N.D. Ga. 2019).

Pineda v. Transunion, LLC (M.D. Fla. 2021).

Long v. Nationwide Recovery Serv., Inc. (W.D. Ky. 2023).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(b)(3) — 2 cases

Serrano v. Sterling Testing Sys., Inc., 557 F. Supp. 2d 688 (E.D. Pa. 2008).

Meuse v. Nat'l P.I. Servs., LLC (D. Mass. 2024).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(c) — 1 case

Beseke v. Equifax Info. Servs. LLC (D. Minnesota 2019).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(c)(1) — 5 cases

Long v. Nationwide Recovery Serv., Inc. (W.D. Ky. 2023).

Consum. Data Indus. Ass'n v. Frey (D. Me. 2024).

Beseke v. Equifax Info. Servs. LLC (D. Minnesota 2019).

Wimberly v. Experian Info. Soultions (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Gillespie, Heather v. Equifax Info Serv (7th Cir. 2007).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(c)(2) — 2 cases

Heather Gillespie & Angela Cinson v. Equifax Info. Servs., L.L.C., 484 F.3d 938 (7th Cir. 2007).

Gillespie, Heather v. Equifax Info Serv (7th Cir. 2007).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(c)(l) — 3 cases

Heather Gillespie & Angela Cinson v. Equifax Info. Servs., L.L.C., 484 F.3d 938 (7th Cir. 2007).

Brandon v. Fin. Accounts Servs. Team, Inc., 701 F. Supp. 2d 990 (E.D. Tenn. 2010).

Gillespie v. Trans Union, LLC, 433 F. Supp. 2d 908 (N.D. Ill. 2006).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(d)(2) — 1 case

Holmes v. Telecheck Int'l, Inc., 556 F. Supp. 2d 819 (M.D. Tenn. 2008).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(d)(l) — 1 case

Andrea Childress v. Experian Info. Solutions, 790 F.3d 745 (7th Cir. 2015).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(e) — 3 cases

Acosta v. Trans Union, LLC, 240 F.R.D. 564 (C.D. Cal. 2007).

Becker v. Early Warning Servs., LLC (E.D. Pa. 2020).

Rodriguez v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC (S.D. Cal. 2023).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(f) — 9 cases

Poore v. Sterling Testing Sys., Inc., 410 F. Supp. 2d 557 (E.D. Ky. 2006).

Dimezza v. First USA Bank, Inc., 103 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (D.N.M. 2000).

Soghomonian v. United States, 278 F. Supp. 2d 1151 (E.D. Cal. 2003).

Ennis v. Equifax Info. Servs. LLC (M.D. Ga. 2021).

Crump v. Carrington Mortg. Servs., LLC (N.D. Ill. 2019).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g) — 89 cases

Stephanie Daniel v. Nat'l Park Serv., 891 F.3d 762 (9th Cir. 2018). “NAT’L PARK SERVICE SUMMARY* Fair Credit Reporting Act The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a suit brought pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g), against the National Park Service alleging that the Service violated the Act by failing to…”

Ehrheart v. Verizon Wireless, 609 F.3d 590 (3rd Cir. 2010). “al did not remove an expiration date of a credit or debit card from a receipt, but otherwise complied with FACTA: [A]ny person who printed an expiration date on any receipt provided to a consumer cardholder at a point of sale or transaction between December 4, 2004, and the date…”

Katz v. Donna Karan Co., 872 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 2017). “1952 (codified as amended at 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)). FACTA seeks to reduce the risk of identity theft by, among other things, prohibiting merchants from including more than the last five digits of a customer’s credit card number on a printed receipt.”

Steven Bassett v. Abm Parking Servs., 883 F.3d 776 (9th Cir. 2018). “When Steven Bassett used his credit card at an ABM parking garage, he received a receipt displaying the card’s full expiration date—a violation of the requirement that businesses redact certain credit card information on printed receipts.”

Wood v. J Choo USA, Inc., 201 F. Supp. 3d 1332 (S.D. Fla. 2016).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)(1) — 54 cases

Doris Jeffries v. Volume Servs. Am., Inc., 928 F.3d 1059 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “1952 , 1959-60 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g) ), which prohibits printing "more than the last 5 digits of the card number or the expiration date upon any receipt provided to the cardholder at the point of the sale or transaction.”

Steven Hammer v. Sam's East, Inc., 754 F.3d 492 (8th Cir. 2014). “(collectively -2- “Sam’s Club”)1 willfully violated a provision of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)(1), which prohibits a person accepting credit or debit cards for a consumer transaction from “print[ing] more than the last five digits…”

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc., 905 F.3d 1200 (11th Cir. 2018). “” See 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g); cf. Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.”

Buchwald Capital Advisors, LLC v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (In Re Greektown Holdings, LLC), 917 F.3d 451 (6th Cir. 2019).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)(2) — 7 cases

Harris v. Mexican Specialty Foods, Inc., 564 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2009).

Simonoff v. Expedia, Inc., 643 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2011). “15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g). FACTA, then, prohibits merchants from printing credit card expiration dates and non-truncated credit card numbers on “electronically printed” receipts.”

Randy Long v. Tommy Hilfiger USA Inc, 671 F.3d 371 (3rd Cir. 2012).

Grimes v. Rave Motion Pictures Birmingham, L.L.C., 264 F.R.D. 659 (N.D. Ala. 2010).

Ehrheart v. Lifetime Brands, Inc., 498 F. Supp. 2d 753 (E.D. Pa. 2007).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)(3) — 9 cases

Harris v. Mexican Specialty Foods, Inc., 564 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2009).

Stillmock v. Weis Markets, Inc., 385 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2010).

Arcilla v. Adidas Promotional Retail Operations, Inc., 488 F. Supp. 2d 965 (C.D. Cal. 2007).

Ehrheart v. Lifetime Brands, Inc., 498 F. Supp. 2d 753 (E.D. Pa. 2007).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)(3)(A) — 6 cases

Korman v. Walking Co., 503 F. Supp. 2d 755 (E.D. Pa. 2007).

Matthews v. United Retail, Inc., 248 F.R.D. 210 (N.D. Ill. 2008).

Hammer v. JP's Sw. Foods, L.L.C., 739 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (W.D. Mo. 2010).

Hammer v. Jp's Sw. Foods, LLC, 267 F.R.D. 284 (W.D. Mo. 2010).

Armes v. Sogro, Inc., 932 F. Supp. 2d 931 (E.D. Wis. 2013).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)(l) — 43 cases

Bateman v. Am. Multi-Cinema, Inc., 623 F.3d 708 (9th Cir. 2010).

Meyers v. Nicolet Restaurant of de Pere, LLC, 843 F.3d 724 (7th Cir. 2016).

Jeremy Meyers v. Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wi, 836 F.3d 818 (7th Cir. 2016).

— 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(h) — 2 cases

Drew v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC, 690 F.3d 1100 (9th Cir. 2012).

Nelson v. Experian Info. Solutions Inc (N.D. Ala. 2023).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.