Notes of Decisions
Carol Tims v. LGE Cmty. Credit Union, 935 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2019).
“See also 15 U.S.C. § 1693c (requiring financial institutions to make disclosures "in accordance with the regulations of the" CFPB "in readily understandable language").”
Feinman v. Bank of Delaware, 728 F. Supp. 1105 (D. Del. 1990).
· cites it 8× “On the one hand, the Act requires that the terms and conditions of the account must be disclosed “in readily understandable language_” 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a). Furthermore, such disclosures include, inter alia, “any limitations on the frequency or dollar amount of” ATM transfers,…”
Berenson v. Nat'l Fin. Servs., LLC, 403 F. Supp. 2d 133 (D. Mass. 2005).
“15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a). The disclosure must include the fees and charges associated with the transfer.”
Spain v. Union Trust, 674 F. Supp. 1496 (D. Conn. 1987).
· cites it 3× “Count Two Defendant violated 15 U.S.C. § 1693c and Reg. E, 295 C.F.R. § 205.”
Bank of Am. v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 309 F.3d 551 (9th Cir. 2002).
“…measures contemplated by it are aimed at promoting disclosure, preventing fraud, and allocating liability. See 15 U.S.C. § 1693c (requiring disclosure of terms and conditions of electronic transfers); § 1693d (requiring documentation of transfers); § 1693e (requiring a…”
Azose v. Washington Mut. Bank, 588 F. Supp. 2d 366 (E.D.N.Y 2008).
“7 ; see 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a)(4) (“The terms and conditions of electronic fund transfers involving a consumer’s account shall be disclosed at the time the consumer contracts for an electronic fund transfer service, in accordance with the regulations of the Board.”
Beaman v. Bank of Am., N.A. (D.N.J. 2023).
· cites it 6× “EFTA, 15 U.S.C. § 1693c BOA argues Plaintiffs’ Section 1693c claim fails because, from the onset of the parties’ relationship, Plaintiffs’ Account Agreement permitted BOA to freeze their accounts upon suspicion of fraud or irregular activity without prior notice to the account…”
PayPal, Inc. v. CFPB, 58 F.4th 1273 (D.C. Cir. 2023).
· cites it 4× “” 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a); id. § 1693c(a)(1)–(10).”
Beaman v. Bank of Am., N.A. (D.N.J. 2024).
· cites it 4× “EFTA, 15 U.S.C. § 1693c BOA argues Plaintiffs’ Section 1693c claims fail because EFTA, Regulation E, and the Account Agreement permit BOA to freeze accounts.”
Cheng v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (E.D.N.Y 2021).
· cites it 3× “4 (a)(1); 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a), and disclose “any charges for electronic fund transfers or for the right to make such transfers.”
Paypal, Inc. v. Consum. Fin. Prot. Bureau (D.D.C. 2020).
· cites it 2× “” 15 U.S.C. § 1693c. But this cannot be read to control over the neighboring provision that specifies how the Bureau can regulate disclosure clauses.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a) — 7 cases
Berenson v. Nat'l Fin. Servs., LLC, 403 F. Supp. 2d 133 (D. Mass. 2005).
“15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a). The disclosure must include the fees and charges associated with the transfer.”
Feinman v. Bank of Delaware, 728 F. Supp. 1105 (D. Del. 1990).
“On the one hand, the Act requires that the terms and conditions of the account must be disclosed “in readily understandable language_” 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a). Furthermore, such disclosures include, inter alia, “any limitations on the frequency or dollar amount of” ATM transfers,…”
PayPal, Inc. v. CFPB, 58 F.4th 1273 (D.C. Cir. 2023).
“” 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a); id. § 1693c(a)(1)–(10).”
Beaman v. Bank of Am., N.A. (D.N.J. 2023).
“EFTA, 15 U.S.C. § 1693c BOA argues Plaintiffs’ Section 1693c claim fails because, from the onset of the parties’ relationship, Plaintiffs’ Account Agreement permitted BOA to freeze their accounts upon suspicion of fraud or irregular activity without prior notice to the account…”
Cheng v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (E.D.N.Y 2021).
“4 (a)(1); 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a), and disclose “any charges for electronic fund transfers or for the right to make such transfers.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a)(3) — 1 case
Feinman v. Bank of Delaware, 728 F. Supp. 1105 (D. Del. 1990).
“On the one hand, the Act requires that the terms and conditions of the account must be disclosed “in readily understandable language_” 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a). Furthermore, such disclosures include, inter alia, “any limitations on the frequency or dollar amount of” ATM transfers,…”
— 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a)(4) — 5 cases
Feinman v. Bank of Delaware, 728 F. Supp. 1105 (D. Del. 1990).
“On the one hand, the Act requires that the terms and conditions of the account must be disclosed “in readily understandable language_” 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a). Furthermore, such disclosures include, inter alia, “any limitations on the frequency or dollar amount of” ATM transfers,…”
Azose v. Washington Mut. Bank, 588 F. Supp. 2d 366 (E.D.N.Y 2008).
“7 ; see 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a)(4) (“The terms and conditions of electronic fund transfers involving a consumer’s account shall be disclosed at the time the consumer contracts for an electronic fund transfer service, in accordance with the regulations of the Board.”
Paypal, Inc. v. Consum. Fin. Prot. Bureau (D.D.C. 2020).
“” 15 U.S.C. § 1693c. But this cannot be read to control over the neighboring provision that specifies how the Bureau can regulate disclosure clauses.”
PayPal, Inc. v. CFPB, 58 F.4th 1273 (D.C. Cir. 2023).
“” 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a); id. § 1693c(a)(1)–(10).”
Cheng v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (E.D.N.Y 2021).
“4 (a)(1); 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a), and disclose “any charges for electronic fund transfers or for the right to make such transfers.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(b) — 3 cases
Feinman v. Bank of Delaware, 728 F. Supp. 1105 (D. Del. 1990).
“On the one hand, the Act requires that the terms and conditions of the account must be disclosed “in readily understandable language_” 15 U.S.C. § 1693c(a). Furthermore, such disclosures include, inter alia, “any limitations on the frequency or dollar amount of” ATM transfers,…”
Beaman v. Bank of Am., N.A. (D.N.J. 2023).
“EFTA, 15 U.S.C. § 1693c BOA argues Plaintiffs’ Section 1693c claim fails because, from the onset of the parties’ relationship, Plaintiffs’ Account Agreement permitted BOA to freeze their accounts upon suspicion of fraud or irregular activity without prior notice to the account…”
Beaman v. Bank of Am., N.A. (D.N.J. 2024).
“EFTA, 15 U.S.C. § 1693c BOA argues Plaintiffs’ Section 1693c claims fail because EFTA, Regulation E, and the Account Agreement permit BOA to freeze accounts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.