15 U.S.C. § 501
Creation of body corporate; directors; principal office; agencies
The Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Agriculture, and three directors first appointed as provided in section 502 of this title and their successors, are created a body corporate of the District of Columbia by the name of the “Textile Foundation” (in this chapter referred to as the corporation). The incorporation shall be held effected upon the date of the first meeting of the board of directors. The corporation shall maintain its principal office in the District of Columbia and may establish such agencies or branch offices at such places as it deems advisable.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1939–2024 · leading case: Newport News Holdings Corp. v. Virtual City Vision, Inc., 650 F.3d 423 (4th Cir. 2011).
Newport News Holdings Corp. v. Virtual City Vision, Inc., 650 F.3d 423 (4th Cir. 2011). “§ 1125 (a), copyright infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 501 , and state law claims of common law trademark infringement, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment.”
Maharishi Hardy Blechman Ltd. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 292 F. Supp. 2d 535 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). “COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT Maharishi claims that the fiery dragon embroidery on the leg of one particular Snopants style is protected under the laws of the United Kingdom and that Abercrombie’s dragon embroidery on its Shi Dings, along with the dragon image on the accompanying hang…”
Coach, Inc. v. Farmers Mkt. & Auction, 881 F. Supp. 2d 695 (D. Maryland 2012). “Contributory Copyright Infringement Lastly, Coach alleges that the Market Defendants are liable for contributory copyright infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 501 because they provided the site and facilities for known infringing activity and failed to take any action to prevent that…”
Fletcher v. Jones, 105 F.2d 58 (D.C. Cir. 1939). “539 , 15 U.S.C.A. § 501 ; Federal Farm Mortgage Corporation, Act of January 31, 1934, 48 Stat.”
Yellowcake, Inc. v. Morena Music, Inc. (E.D. Cal. 2021). “Third Cause of Action – Injunctive Relief under the Copyright Act 13 The Copyright Act provides that a court “may .”
Hayward Indus., Inc. v. BlueWorks Corp. (W.D.N.C. 2024). “infringed that same copyrighted work in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 501 . See (Doc. No. 353 ¶¶ 12–13).”
Restoration Hardware, Inc. v. Alimia Light (N.D. Cal. 2024). “) On 1 Copyrighted Works under the Copyright Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. § 501 ; (2) unfair competition with 2 respect to the RH Marks under the Lanham Act, 15 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.