Whoever purchases, or receives in pledge from any person any arms, equipment, ammunition, clothing, military stores, or other property furnished by the United States under a clothing allowance or otherwise, to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States or of the National Guard or Naval Militia, or to any person accompanying, serving, or retained with the land or naval forces and subject to military or naval law, or to any former member of such Armed Forces at or by any hospital, home, or facility maintained by the United States, having knowledge or reason to believe that the property has been taken from the possession of or furnished by the United States under such allowance, or otherwise, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Kenneth Preston Westbrook (1987)
ca9 · cites it 4×
“” Section 1024 provides: Whoever purchases, or receives in pledge from any person any arms, equipment, ammunition, clothing, military stores, or other property furnished by the United States under a clothing allowance or otherwise, to any member of the Armed Forces of the United…”
Commonwealth ex rel. Kearney v. Rambler (2011)
pa
“§ 1464 ; purchasing a field jacket from a member of the Armed Forces, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1024 ; [and] attempting to mail a letter using a stamp which has already been cancelled if committed by a postal employee, 18 U.”
Melton v. Oleson (1974)
mont
“§ 1464 ; purchasing a field jacket from a member of the Armed Forces, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1024 ; attempting to mail a letter using a stamp which has already been cancelled if committed by a postal employee, 18 U.”
Mills v. Campbell County Canvassing Board (1985)
wyo
“§ 1464 ; purchasing a field jacket from a member of the Armed Forces, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1024 ; attempting to mail a letter using a stamp which has already been cancelled if committed by a postal employee, 18 U.”
In re Anonymous No. 115 D.B. 92 (1994)
pa
“based on his conviction in the United States District Court for the [ ] District of [ ], [ ] Division, of the offenses of use of unauthorized credit cards in violation of 18 U. S.C. §1024(9)(2). Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition for discipline on December 30, 1992…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 1024(9)(2) — 1 case
In re Anonymous No. 115 D.B. 92 (1994)
pa
“based on his conviction in the United States District Court for the [ ] District of [ ], [ ] Division, of the offenses of use of unauthorized credit cards in violation of 18 U. S.C. §1024(9)(2). Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition for discipline on December 30, 1992…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.