Notes of Decisions
Cited in
50
cases (
7 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case:
Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 384 F. Supp. 2d 571 (E.D.N.Y 2005).
Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 384 F. Supp. 2d 571 (E.D.N.Y 2005).
· cites it 5× “Plaintiffs contend that these financial services constitute financing of terrorism in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339C. Count Seven alleges that Arab Bank’s provision of banking and other services to HAMAS, the PIJ, the AAMB and other international terrorists, including…”
Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F. Supp. 2d 542 (E.D.N.Y 2012).
· cites it 5× “The Bank violated 18 U.S.C. § 2339C by unlawfully and willfully or recklessly providing or collecting funds for Hamas with the intention that the funds would be used — or the knowledge that they would be *548 used — to facilitate international terrorism.”
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004).
“*548 § 2339A (material support for various terrorist acts); § 2339B (material support to a foreign terrorist organization); § 2332a (use of a weapon of mass destruction, including conspiracy and attempt); § 2332b(a)(1) (acts of terrorism "transcending national boundaries,"…”
Wultz v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 755 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2010).
· cites it 2× “Plaintiffs Adequately Plead a Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339C .......................”
Almog v. Arab Bank, PLC, 471 F. Supp. 2d 257 (E.D.N.Y 2007).
· cites it 4× “§ 2339B(a)(2) by failing to retain possession of or maintain control over funds or report to the Secretary of the Treasury the existence of funds in which terrorist organizations had an interest when it became aware that it had possession of, or control over, such funds; and (4)…”
Weiss v. Nat'l Westminster Bank PLC, 453 F. Supp. 2d 609 (E.D.N.Y 2006).
· cites it 3× “18 U.S.C. § 2339C. Defendant argues that this claim must be dismissed because (1) routine banking transactions do not constitute providing or collecting funds and (2) plaintiffs have not sufficiently alleged the defendant acted knowingly and intentionally.”
Strauss v. Crédit Lyonnais, S.A., 925 F. Supp. 2d 414 (E.D.N.Y 2013).
· cites it 3× “§ 2339B (“Section 2339B”) and 18 U.S.C. § 2339C (“Section 2339C”). Violations of Sections 2339B and 2339C are considered to be acts of “international terrorism” under Section 2333(a).”
Abecassis v. Wyatt, 785 F. Supp. 2d 614 (S.D. Tex. 2011).
· cites it 4× “*628 The fourth relevant criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2339C, punishes: Whoever, [subject to jurisdictional requirements in] subsection (b), by any means, directly or indirectly, unlawfully and willfully provides or collects funds with the intention that such funds be used, or…”
James Owens v. BNP Paribas, S.A., 897 F.3d 266 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“" Plaintiffs initially pled a violation of a third statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2339C, which criminalizes providing or collecting funds with knowledge that such funds would be used to carry out acts intending to cause death or serious bodily injury in order to intimidate a population or…”
Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F. Supp. 2d 474 (E.D.N.Y 2012).
· cites it 3× “Defendant violated 18 U.S.C. § 2339C by unlawfully and willfully providing or collecting funds for Ha-mas with the intention that the funds would be used — or the knowledge that they would be used — to facilitate acts of international terrorism; plaintiff claims that the…”
Goldberg v. UBS AG, 690 F. Supp. 2d 92 (E.D.N.Y 2010).
· cites it 3× “§ 2333 (a); and (3) collecting and transmitting funds on behalf of a terrorist organization in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339C 4 and 18 U.S.C. § 2332 (a).”
Stuart Force v. Facebook, Inc., 304 F. Supp. 3d 315 (E.D.N.Y 2018).
· cites it 4× “Additionally, Plaintiffs propose adding a new claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(c) based on Facebook's purported concealment of material resources provided to Hamas, as well as factual allegations related to that claim.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(a) — 3 cases
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(a)(1) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(a)(1)(B) — 2 cases
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(a)(2) — 1 case
Abecassis v. Wyatt, 785 F. Supp. 2d 614 (S.D. Tex. 2011).
“*628 The fourth relevant criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2339C, punishes: Whoever, [subject to jurisdictional requirements in] subsection (b), by any means, directly or indirectly, unlawfully and willfully provides or collects funds with the intention that such funds be used, or…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(a)(3) — 3 cases
Abecassis v. Wyatt, 785 F. Supp. 2d 614 (S.D. Tex. 2011).
“*628 The fourth relevant criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2339C, punishes: Whoever, [subject to jurisdictional requirements in] subsection (b), by any means, directly or indirectly, unlawfully and willfully provides or collects funds with the intention that such funds be used, or…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(a)(l) — 4 cases
Strauss v. Crédit Lyonnais, S.A., 925 F. Supp. 2d 414 (E.D.N.Y 2013).
“§ 2339B (“Section 2339B”) and 18 U.S.C. § 2339C (“Section 2339C”). Violations of Sections 2339B and 2339C are considered to be acts of “international terrorism” under Section 2333(a).”
Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F. Supp. 2d 542 (E.D.N.Y 2012).
“The Bank violated 18 U.S.C. § 2339C by unlawfully and willfully or recklessly providing or collecting funds for Hamas with the intention that the funds would be used — or the knowledge that they would be *548 used — to facilitate international terrorism.”
Abecassis v. Wyatt, 785 F. Supp. 2d 614 (S.D. Tex. 2011).
“*628 The fourth relevant criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2339C, punishes: Whoever, [subject to jurisdictional requirements in] subsection (b), by any means, directly or indirectly, unlawfully and willfully provides or collects funds with the intention that such funds be used, or…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(a)(l)(B) — 1 case
Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F. Supp. 2d 474 (E.D.N.Y 2012).
“Defendant violated 18 U.S.C. § 2339C by unlawfully and willfully providing or collecting funds for Ha-mas with the intention that the funds would be used — or the knowledge that they would be used — to facilitate acts of international terrorism; plaintiff claims that the…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(b) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(b)(2)(C)(iii) — 2 cases
Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F. Supp. 2d 474 (E.D.N.Y 2012).
“Defendant violated 18 U.S.C. § 2339C by unlawfully and willfully providing or collecting funds for Ha-mas with the intention that the funds would be used — or the knowledge that they would be used — to facilitate acts of international terrorism; plaintiff claims that the…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(c) — 4 cases
Stuart Force v. Facebook, Inc., 304 F. Supp. 3d 315 (E.D.N.Y 2018).
“Additionally, Plaintiffs propose adding a new claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(c) based on Facebook's purported concealment of material resources provided to Hamas, as well as factual allegations related to that claim.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(c)(1)(A) — 1 case
Stuart Force v. Facebook, Inc., 304 F. Supp. 3d 315 (E.D.N.Y 2018).
“Additionally, Plaintiffs propose adding a new claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(c) based on Facebook's purported concealment of material resources provided to Hamas, as well as factual allegations related to that claim.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(c)(2)(A) — 2 cases
Stuart Force v. Facebook, Inc., 304 F. Supp. 3d 315 (E.D.N.Y 2018).
“Additionally, Plaintiffs propose adding a new claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(c) based on Facebook's purported concealment of material resources provided to Hamas, as well as factual allegations related to that claim.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(e)(14) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(e)(3) — 3 cases
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(e)(4) — 3 cases
Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 384 F. Supp. 2d 571 (E.D.N.Y 2005).
“Plaintiffs contend that these financial services constitute financing of terrorism in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339C. Count Seven alleges that Arab Bank’s provision of banking and other services to HAMAS, the PIJ, the AAMB and other international terrorists, including…”
Weiss v. Nat'l Westminster Bank PLC, 453 F. Supp. 2d 609 (E.D.N.Y 2006).
“18 U.S.C. § 2339C. Defendant argues that this claim must be dismissed because (1) routine banking transactions do not constitute providing or collecting funds and (2) plaintiffs have not sufficiently alleged the defendant acted knowingly and intentionally.”
Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F. Supp. 2d 542 (E.D.N.Y 2012).
“The Bank violated 18 U.S.C. § 2339C by unlawfully and willfully or recklessly providing or collecting funds for Hamas with the intention that the funds would be used — or the knowledge that they would be *548 used — to facilitate international terrorism.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2339C(e)(5) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.