18 U.S.C. § 2339B

Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Prohibited Activities.—(1)Unlawful conduct.—Whoever knowingly provides material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life. To violate this paragraph, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization (as defined in subsection (g)(6)), that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act), or that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorism (as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989).(2)Financial institutions.—Except as authorized by the Secretary, any financial institution that becomes aware that it has possession of, or control over, any funds in which a foreign terrorist organization, or its agent, has an interest, shall—(A) retain possession of, or maintain control over, such funds; and(B) report to the Secretary the existence of such funds in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary.(b)Civil Penalty.—Any financial institution that knowingly fails to comply with subsection (a)(2) shall be subject to a civil penalty in an amount that is the greater of—(A) $50,000 per violation; or(B) twice the amount of which the financial institution was required under subsection (a)(2) to retain possession or control.(c)Injunction.—Whenever it appears to the Secretary or the Attorney General that any person is engaged in, or is about to engage in, any act that constitutes, or would constitute, a violation of this section, the Attorney General may initiate civil action in a district court of the United States to enjoin such violation.(d)Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.—(1)In general.—There is jurisdiction over an offense under subsection (a) if—(A) an offender is a national of the United States (as defined in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22))) or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as defined in section 101(a)(20) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20)));(B) an offender is a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States;(C) after the conduct required for the offense occurs an offender is brought into or found in the United States, even if the conduct required for the offense occurs outside the United States;(D) the offense occurs in whole or in part within the United States;(E) the offense occurs in or affects interstate or foreign commerce; or(F) an offender aids or abets any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this paragraph in committing an offense under subsection (a) or conspires with any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this paragraph to commit an offense under subsection (a).(2)Extraterritorial jurisdiction.—There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section.(e)Investigations.—(1)In general.—The Attorney General shall conduct any investigation of a possible violation of this section, or of any license, order, or regulation issued pursuant to this section.(2)Coordination with the department of the treasury.—The Attorney General shall work in coordination with the Secretary in investigations relating to—(A) the compliance or noncompliance by a financial institution with the requirements of subsection (a)(2); and(B) civil penalty proceedings authorized under subsection (b).(3)Referral.—Any evidence of a criminal violation of this section arising in the course of an investigation by the Secretary or any other Federal agency shall be referred immediately to the Attorney General for further investigation. The Attorney General shall timely notify the Secretary of any action taken on referrals from the Secretary, and may refer investigations to the Secretary for remedial licensing or civil penalty action.(f)Classified Information in Civil Proceedings Brought by the United States.—(1)Discovery of classified information by defendants.—(A)Request by united states.—In any civil proceeding under this section, upon request made ex parte and in writing by the United States, a court, upon a sufficient showing, may authorize the United States to—(i) redact specified items of classified information from documents to be introduced into evidence or made available to the defendant through discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;(ii) substitute a summary of the information for such classified documents; or(iii) substitute a statement admitting relevant facts that the classified information would tend to prove.(B)Order granting request.—If the court enters an order granting a request under this paragraph, the entire text of the documents to which the request relates shall be sealed and preserved in the records of the court to be made available to the appellate court in the event of an appeal.(C)Denial of request.—If the court enters an order denying a request of the United States under this paragraph, the United States may take an immediate, interlocutory appeal in accordance with paragraph (5). For purposes of such an appeal, the entire text of the documents to which the request relates, together with any transcripts of arguments made ex parte to the court in connection therewith, shall be maintained under seal and delivered to the appellate court.(2)Introduction of classified information; precautions by court.—(A)Exhibits.—To prevent unnecessary or inadvertent disclosure of classified information in a civil proceeding brought by the United States under this section, the United States may petition the court ex parte to admit, in lieu of classified writings, recordings, or photographs, one or more of the following:(i) Copies of items from which classified information has been redacted.(ii) Stipulations admitting relevant facts that specific classified information would tend to prove.(iii) A declassified summary of the specific classified information.(B)Determination by court.—The court shall grant a request under this paragraph if the court finds that the redacted item, stipulation, or summary is sufficient to allow the defendant to prepare a defense.(3)Taking of trial testimony.—(A)Objection.—During the examination of a witness in any civil proceeding brought by the United States under this subsection, the United States may object to any question or line of inquiry that may require the witness to disclose classified information not previously found to be admissible.(B)Action by court.—In determining whether a response is admissible, the court shall take precautions to guard against the compromise of any classified information, including—(i) permitting the United States to provide the court, ex parte, with a proffer of the witness’s response to the question or line of inquiry; and(ii) requiring the defendant to provide the court with a proffer of the nature of the information that the defendant seeks to elicit.(C)Obligation of defendant.—In any civil proceeding under this section, it shall be the defendant’s obligation to establish the relevance and materiality of any classified information sought to be introduced.(4)Appeal.—If the court enters an order denying a request of the United States under this subsection, the United States may take an immediate interlocutory appeal in accordance with paragraph (5).(5)Interlocutory appeal.—(A)Subject of appeal.—An interlocutory appeal by the United States shall lie to a court of appeals from a decision or order of a district court—(i) authorizing the disclosure of classified information;(ii) imposing sanctions for nondisclosure of classified information; or(iii) refusing a protective order sought by the United States to prevent the disclosure of classified information.(B)Expedited consideration.—(i)In general.—An appeal taken pursuant to this paragraph, either before or during trial, shall be expedited by the court of appeals.(ii)Appeals prior to trial.—If an appeal is of an order made prior to trial, an appeal shall be taken not later than 14 days after the decision or order appealed from, and the trial shall not commence until the appeal is resolved.(iii)Appeals during trial.—If an appeal is taken during trial, the trial court shall adjourn the trial until the appeal is resolved, and the court of appeals—(I) shall hear argument on such appeal not later than 4 days after the adjournment of the trial, excluding intermediate weekends and holidays;(II) may dispense with written briefs other than the supporting materials previously submitted to the trial court;(III) shall render its decision not later than 4 days after argument on appeal, excluding intermediate weekends and holidays; and(IV) may dispense with the issuance of a written opinion in rendering its decision.(C)Effect of ruling.—An interlocutory appeal and decision shall not affect the right of the defendant, in a subsequent appeal from a final judgment, to claim as error reversal by the trial court on remand of a ruling appealed from during trial.(6)Construction.—Nothing in this subsection shall prevent the United States from seeking protective orders or asserting privileges ordinarily available to the United States to protect against the disclosure of classified information, including the invocation of the military and State secrets privilege.(g)Definitions.—As used in this section—(1) the term “classified information” has the meaning given that term in section 1(a) of the Classified Information Procedures Act (18 U.S.C. App.);(2) the term “financial institution” has the same meaning as in section 5312(a)(2) of title 31, United States Code;(3) the term “funds” includes coin or currency of the United States or any other country, traveler’s checks, personal checks, bank checks, money orders, stocks, bonds, debentures, drafts, letters of credit, any other negotiable instrument, and any electronic representation of any of the foregoing;(4) the term “material support or resources” has the same meaning given that term in section 2339A (including the definitions of “training” and “expert advice or assistance” in that section);(5) the term “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Treasury; and(6) the term “terrorist organization” means an organization designated as a terrorist organization under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.(h)Provision of Personnel.—No person may be prosecuted under this section in connection with the term “personnel” unless that person has knowingly provided, attempted to provide, or conspired to provide a foreign terrorist organization with 1 or more individuals (who may be or include himself) to work under that terrorist organization’s direction or control or to organize, manage, supervise, or otherwise direct the operation of that organization. Individuals who act entirely independently of the foreign terrorist organization to advance its goals or objectives shall not be considered to be working under the foreign terrorist organization’s direction and control.(i)Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed or applied so as to abridge the exercise of rights guaranteed under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.(j)Exception.—No person may be prosecuted under this section in connection with the term “personnel”, “training”, or “expert advice or assistance” if the provision of that material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization was approved by the Secretary of State with the concurrence of the Attorney General. The Secretary of State may not approve the provision of any material support that may be used to carry out terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act).(Added Pub. L. 104–132, title III, § 303(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1250; amended Pub. L. 107–56, title VIII, § 810(d), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 380; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6603(c)–(f), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3762, 3763; Pub. L. 111–16, § 3(6)–(8), May 7, 2009, 123 Stat. 1608; Pub. L. 114–23, title VII, § 704, June 2, 2015, 129 Stat. 300.)References in Text

Section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, referred to in subsecs. (a)(1) and (j), is classified to section 1182(a)(3)(B) of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.

Section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is classified to section 2656f(d)(2) of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (f)(1)(A)(i), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Section 1(a) of the Classified Information Procedures Act, referred to in subsec. (g)(1), is section 1(a) of Pub. L. 95–456, which is set out in the Appendix to this title.

Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, referred to in subsec. (g)(6), is classified to section 1189 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.

Editorial NotesAmendments

2015—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 114–23 substituted “20 years” for “15 years”.

2009—Subsec. (f)(5)(B)(ii). Pub. L. 111–16, § 3(6), substituted “14 days” for “10 days”.

Subsec. (f)(5)(B)(iii)(I). Pub. L. 111–16, § 3(7), inserted “, excluding intermediate weekends and holidays” after “trial”.

Subsec. (f)(5)(B)(iii)(III). Pub. L. 111–16, § 3(8), inserted “, excluding intermediate weekends and holidays” after “appeal”.

2004—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 108–458, § 6603(c), struck out “, within the United States or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,” after “Whoever” and inserted at end “To violate this paragraph, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization (as defined in subsection (g)(6)), that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act), or that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorism (as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989).”

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 108–458, § 6603(d), designated existing provisions as par. (2), inserted par. (2) heading, and added par. (1).

Subsec. (g)(4). Pub. L. 108–458, § 6603(e), amended par. (4) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (4) read as follows: “the term ‘material support or resources’ has the same meaning as in section 2339A;”.

Subsecs. (h) to (j). Pub. L. 108–458, § 6603(f), added subsecs. (h) to (j).

2001—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 107–56 substituted “15 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life” for “10 years, or both”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2009 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–16 effective Dec. 1, 2009, see section 7 of Pub. L. 111–16, set out as a note under section 109 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.

Findings and Purpose

Pub. L. 104–132, title III, § 301, Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1247, provided that:“(a)Findings.—The Congress finds that—“(1) international terrorism is a serious and deadly problem that threatens the vital interests of the United States;“(2) the Constitution confers upon Congress the power to punish crimes against the law of nations and to carry out the treaty obligations of the United States, and therefore Congress may by law impose penalties relating to the provision of material support to foreign organizations engaged in terrorist activity;“(3) the power of the United States over immigration and naturalization permits the exclusion from the United States of persons belonging to international terrorist organizations;“(4) international terrorism affects the interstate and foreign commerce of the United States by harming international trade and market stability, and limiting international travel by United States citizens as well as foreign visitors to the United States;“(5) international cooperation is required for an effective response to terrorism, as demonstrated by the numerous multilateral conventions in force providing universal prosecutive jurisdiction over persons involved in a variety of terrorist acts, including hostage taking, murder of an internationally protected person, and aircraft piracy and sabotage;“(6) some foreign terrorist organizations, acting through affiliated groups or individuals, raise significant funds within the United States, or use the United States as a conduit for the receipt of funds raised in other nations; and“(7) foreign organizations that engage in terrorist activity are so tainted by their criminal conduct that any contribution to such an organization facilitates that conduct.“(b)Purpose.—The purpose of this subtitle [subtitle A (§§ 301–303) of title III of Pub. L. 104–132, enacting this section and section 1189 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality] is to provide the Federal Government the fullest possible basis, consistent with the Constitution, to prevent persons within the United States, or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, from providing material support or resources to foreign organizations that engage in terrorist activities.”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 396 cases (101 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: United States v. Farhane, 634 F.3d 127 (2d Cir. 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Farhane, 634 F.3d 127 (2d Cir. 2011). · cites it 28× “18 U.S.C. § 2339B Is Not Unconstitutionally Vague as Applied to Sabir's Case .”

United States v. Stewart, 590 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2009). · cites it 14× “History of the Charges By way of background, the initial indictment charged all three defendants with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2339B. [15] The defendants argued before the district court that "18 U.”

United States v. Shukri Baker, 664 F.3d 467 (5th Cir. 2011). · cites it 9× “Hamas was further designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization in 1997, as contemplated by 18 U.S.C. § 2339B. Although this case is related to terrorism, it does not involve charges of specific terrorist acts.”

United States v. Lindh, 212 F. Supp. 2d 541 (E.D. Va. 2002). · cites it 15× “§ 2332 (b)(2) (Count One); (ii) conspiracy to provide material support and resources to HUM, a foreign terrorist organization, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (Count Two); (in) providing material support and resources to HUM, in violation of 18 U.”

United States v. Hammoud, 381 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 2004). · cites it 9× “Additionally, Hammoud was charged with conspiracy to provide material support to a designated FTO and with providing material support to a designated FTO, both in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2339B (West 2000 & Supp.2004).”

Humanitarian Law Proj. v. Gonzales, 380 F. Supp. 2d 1134 (C.D. Cal. 2005). · cites it 21× “Accordingly, the AEDPA, as amended by the IRTPA, now states: “To violate this paragraph, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization, that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorist activity, or that the organization has…”

United States v. Nuradin M. Abdi, 463 F.3d 547 (6th Cir. 2006). · cites it 12× “Count 2 alleged that Abdi conspired to provide material support and resources to a foreign terrorist organization — A1 Qaeda — in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339B. Counts 3 and 4 alleged that Abdi acquired, possessed, or employed false travel documents in order to facilitate an…”

United States v. Ahmed, 94 F. Supp. 3d 394 (E.D.N.Y 2015). · cites it 31× “Defendants are charged with conspiring to provide, providing, and attempting to provide “material support or resources to” and “receiving military-type training from” al-Shabaab, a “designated foreign terrorist organization,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2339B and 2339D, and…”

United States v. Burson Augustin, 661 F.3d 1105 (11th Cir. 2011). · cites it 9× “Abraham, Rotschild Augustine, and Narseal Batiste (collectively, “Appellants”) were all convicted of (1) conspiracy to provide material support to a Foreign Terrorist Organization (A1 Qaeda) by agreeing to provide personnel (including themselves) to work under A1 Qaeda’s…”

Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 882 F.3d 314 (2d Cir. 2018). · cites it 5× “In support, they relied on 18 U.S.C. § 2339B, which makes it a felony knowingly to provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization and recognizes the provision of financial services to such an organization as a form of material support, see id.”

United States v. Sattar, 314 F. Supp. 2d 279 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). · cites it 13× “Count One of the original indictment charged Sattar, Stewart, Yousry, and Yassir Al-Sirri, a defendant not charged in the SI Indictment, with conspiring to provide material support and resources to a foreign terrorist organization (“FTO”) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339B. Count…”

Holder v. Humanitarian Law Proj., 177 L. Ed. 2d 355 (2010). · cites it 10× “1247 , note following 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (Findings and Purpose).”

Show all 396 citing cases →

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(1) — 4 cases

United States v. Jones, 383 F. Supp. 3d 810 (E.D. Ill. 2019).

Pam v. Arab Bank, PLC (E.D.N.Y 2023).

Miller v. Arab Bank, PLC (E.D.N.Y 2023).

United States v. Wadi (5th Cir. 2025).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(a) — 21 cases

Humanitarian Law Proj. v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2007).

Humanitarian Law Proj. v. Gonzales, 380 F. Supp. 2d 1134 (C.D. Cal. 2005). “Accordingly, the AEDPA, as amended by the IRTPA, now states: “To violate this paragraph, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization, that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorist activity, or that the organization has…”

Humanitarian Law Proj. v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2009).

Holder v. Humanitarian Law Proj., 177 L. Ed. 2d 355 (2010). “1247 , note following 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (Findings and Purpose).”

Humanitarian Law Proj. v. Reno, 9 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (C.D. Cal. 1998).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(a)(1) — 124 cases

United States v. Farhane, 634 F.3d 127 (2d Cir. 2011). “18 U.S.C. § 2339B Is Not Unconstitutionally Vague as Applied to Sabir's Case .”

United States v. Laith Alebbini, 979 F.3d 537 (6th Cir. 2020).

United States v. Mumuni, 946 F.3d 97 (2d Cir. 2019).

Holder v. Humanitarian Law Proj., 177 L. Ed. 2d 355 (2010). “1247 , note following 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (Findings and Purpose).”

United States v. Lutchman, 910 F.3d 33 (2d Cir. 2018).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(a)(2) — 11 cases

Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 384 F. Supp. 2d 571 (E.D.N.Y 2005).

Almog v. Arab Bank, PLC, 471 F. Supp. 2d 257 (E.D.N.Y 2007).

United States v. Hammoud, 381 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 2004). “Additionally, Hammoud was charged with conspiracy to provide material support to a designated FTO and with providing material support to a designated FTO, both in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2339B (West 2000 & Supp.2004).”

People's Mojahedin Org. v. Dep't of State, 327 F.3d 1238 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 353 F. Supp. 2d 327 (E.D.N.Y 2004).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(a)(l) — 87 cases

United States v. Al-Moayad, 545 F.3d 139 (2d Cir. 2008).

United States v. Shukri Baker, 664 F.3d 467 (5th Cir. 2011). “Hamas was further designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization in 1997, as contemplated by 18 U.S.C. § 2339B. Although this case is related to terrorism, it does not involve charges of specific terrorist acts.”

Weiss v. Nat'l Westminster Bank PLC, 768 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2014).

United States v. Ahmed, 94 F. Supp. 3d 394 (E.D.N.Y 2015). “Defendants are charged with conspiring to provide, providing, and attempting to provide “material support or resources to” and “receiving military-type training from” al-Shabaab, a “designated foreign terrorist organization,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2339B and 2339D, and…”

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(c) — 1 case

Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 353 F. Supp. 2d 327 (E.D.N.Y 2004).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(d) — 2 cases

United States v. Mostafa, 965 F. Supp. 2d 451 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).

United States v. Jama, 217 F. Supp. 3d 882 (E.D. Va. 2016).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(d)(1)(E) — 1 case

United States v. All Petroleum-Prod. Cargo Onboard the M/T Arina (D.C. Cir. 2026).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(d)(2) — 3 cases

Eur. Cmty. v. RJR Nabisco, Inc., 783 F.3d 123 (2d Cir. 2015).

United States v. Naseer, 38 F. Supp. 3d 269 (E.D.N.Y 2014).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(d)(l) — 1 case

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(d)(l)(C) — 1 case

United States v. Naseer, 38 F. Supp. 3d 269 (E.D.N.Y 2014).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(d)(l)(E) — 1 case

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(e) — 1 case

Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 353 F. Supp. 2d 327 (E.D.N.Y 2004).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(f)(5)(B)(iii) — 1 case

In Re Antrobus, 519 F.3d 1123 (10th Cir. 2008).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(g)(4) — 14 cases

Est. of Parsons v. Palestinian Auth., 651 F.3d 118 (D.C. Cir. 2011).

United States v. Burson Augustin, 661 F.3d 1105 (11th Cir. 2011). “Abraham, Rotschild Augustine, and Narseal Batiste (collectively, “Appellants”) were all convicted of (1) conspiracy to provide material support to a Foreign Terrorist Organization (A1 Qaeda) by agreeing to provide personnel (including themselves) to work under A1 Qaeda’s…”

Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 384 F. Supp. 2d 571 (E.D.N.Y 2005).

United States v. Yousef, 750 F.3d 254 (2d Cir. 2014).

Weiss v. Nat'l Westminster Bank PLC, 453 F. Supp. 2d 609 (E.D.N.Y 2006).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(g)(5) — 1 case

United States v. Sattar, 272 F. Supp. 2d 348 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(g)(6) — 10 cases

Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 882 F.3d 314 (2d Cir. 2018). “In support, they relied on 18 U.S.C. § 2339B, which makes it a felony knowingly to provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization and recognizes the provision of financial services to such an organization as a form of material support, see id.”

United States v. Lindh, 212 F. Supp. 2d 541 (E.D. Va. 2002). “§ 2332 (b)(2) (Count One); (ii) conspiracy to provide material support and resources to HUM, a foreign terrorist organization, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (Count Two); (in) providing material support and resources to HUM, in violation of 18 U.”

United States v. Chandia, 514 F.3d 365 (4th Cir. 2008).

Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 384 F. Supp. 2d 571 (E.D.N.Y 2005).

United States v. Sattar, 272 F. Supp. 2d 348 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(h) — 23 cases

United States v. Farhane, 634 F.3d 127 (2d Cir. 2011). “18 U.S.C. § 2339B Is Not Unconstitutionally Vague as Applied to Sabir's Case .”

United States v. Stewart, 590 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2009). “History of the Charges By way of background, the initial indictment charged all three defendants with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2339B. [15] The defendants argued before the district court that "18 U.”

Humanitarian Law Proj. v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2007).

Humanitarian Law Proj. v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2009).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(i) — 6 cases

United States v. Farhane, 634 F.3d 127 (2d Cir. 2011). “18 U.S.C. § 2339B Is Not Unconstitutionally Vague as Applied to Sabir's Case .”

United States v. Sabir (2d Cir. 2011).

United States v. Burson Augustin (11th Cir. 2011).

— 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(j) — 6 cases

Humanitarian Law Proj. v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2007).

Humanitarian Law Proj. v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2009).

Humanitarian Law Proj. v. United States Dep't of Treasury, 463 F. Supp. 2d 1049 (C.D. Cal. 2006).

Humanitarian Law Proj. v. Mukasey (9th Cir. 2007).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.