18 U.S.C. § 3663

Order of restitution

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)(1)(A) The court, when sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense under this title, section 401, 408(a), 409, 416, 420, or 422(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841, 848(a), 849, 856, 861, 863) (but in no case shall a participant in an offense under such sections be considered a victim of such offense under this section), or section 5124, 46312, 46502, or 46504 of title 49, other than an offense described in section 3663A(c), may order, in addition to or, in the case of a misdemeanor, in lieu of any other penalty authorized by law, that the defendant make restitution to any victim of such offense, or if the victim is deceased, to the victim’s estate. The court may also order, if agreed to by the parties in a plea agreement, restitution to persons other than the victim of the offense.(B)(i) The court, in determining whether to order restitution under this section, shall consider—(I) the amount of the loss sustained by each victim as a result of the offense; and(II) the financial resources of the defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and the defendant’s dependents, and such other factors as the court deems appropriate.(ii) To the extent that the court determines that the complication and prolongation of the sentencing process resulting from the fashioning of an order of restitution under this section outweighs the need to provide restitution to any victims, the court may decline to make such an order.(2) For the purposes of this section, the term “victim” means a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of an offense for which restitution may be ordered including, in the case of an offense that involves as an element a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal activity, any person directly harmed by the defendant’s criminal conduct in the course of the scheme, conspiracy, or pattern. In the case of a victim who is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the legal guardian of the victim or representative of the victim’s estate, another family member, or any other person appointed as suitable by the court, may assume the victim’s rights under this section, but in no event shall the defendant be named as such representative or guardian.(3) The court may also order restitution in any criminal case to the extent agreed to by the parties in a plea agreement.(b) The order may require that such defendant—(1) in the case of an offense resulting in damage to or loss or destruction of property of a victim of the offense—(A) return the property to the owner of the property or someone designated by the owner; or(B) if return of the property under subparagraph (A) is impossible, impractical, or inadequate, pay an amount equal to the greater of—(i) the value of the property on the date of the damage, loss, or destruction, or(ii) the value of the property on the date of sentencing,less the value (as of the date the property is returned) of any part of the property that is returned;(2) in the case of an offense resulting in bodily injury to a victim including an offense under chapter 109A or chapter 110—(A) pay an amount equal to the cost of necessary medical and related professional services and devices relating to physical, psychiatric, and psychological care, including nonmedical care and treatment rendered in accordance with a method of healing recognized by the law of the place of treatment;(B) pay an amount equal to the cost of necessary physical and occupational therapy and rehabilitation; and(C) reimburse the victim for income lost by such victim as a result of such offense;(3) in the case of an offense resulting in bodily injury also results in the death of a victim, pay an amount equal to the cost of necessary funeral and related services;(4) in any case, reimburse the victim for lost income and necessary child care, transportation, and other expenses related to participation in the investigation or prosecution of the offense or attendance at proceedings related to the offense;(5) in any case, if the victim (or if the victim is deceased, the victim’s estate) consents, make restitution in services in lieu of money, or make restitution to a person or organization designated by the victim or the estate; and(6) in the case of an offense under sections 1028(a)(7) or 1028A(a) of this title, pay an amount equal to the value of the time reasonably spent by the victim in an attempt to remediate the intended or actual harm incurred by the victim from the offense.(c)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law (but subject to the provisions of subsections (a)(1)(B)(i)(II) and (ii),11 So in original. Probably should be “(ii)),”. when sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense described in section 401, 408(a), 409, 416, 420, or 422(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841, 848(a), 849, 856, 861, 863), in which there is no identifiable victim, the court may order that the defendant make restitution in accordance with this subsection.(2)(A) An order of restitution under this subsection shall be based on the amount of public harm caused by the offense, as determined by the court in accordance with guidelines promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission.(B) In no case shall the amount of restitution ordered under this subsection exceed the amount of the fine which may be ordered for the offense charged in the case.(3) Restitution under this subsection shall be distributed as follows:(A) 65 percent of the total amount of restitution shall be paid to the State entity designated to administer crime victim assistance in the State in which the crime occurred.(B) 35 percent of the total amount of restitution shall be paid to the State entity designated to receive Federal substance abuse block grant funds.(4) The court shall not make an award under this subsection if it appears likely that such award would interfere with a forfeiture under chapter 46 or chapter 96 of this title or under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.).(5) Notwithstanding section 3612(c) or any other provision of law, a penalty assessment under section 3013 or a fine under subchapter C of chapter 227 shall take precedence over an order of restitution under this subsection.(6) Requests for community restitution under this subsection may be considered in all plea agreements negotiated by the United States.(7)(A) The United States Sentencing Commission shall promulgate guidelines to assist courts in determining the amount of restitution that may be ordered under this subsection.(B) No restitution shall be ordered under this subsection until such time as the Sentencing Commission promulgates guidelines pursuant to this paragraph.(d) An order of restitution made pursuant to this section shall be issued and enforced in accordance with section 3664.(Added Pub. L. 97–291, § 5(a), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1253, § 3579; renumbered § 3663 and amended Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 212(a)(1), (3), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1987, 2010; Pub. L. 98–596, § 9, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3138; Pub. L. 99–646, §§ 8(b), 20(a), 77(a), 78(a), 79(a), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3593, 3596, 3618, 3619; Pub. L. 100–182, § 13, Dec. 7, 1987, 101 Stat. 1268; Pub. L. 100–185, § 12, Dec. 11, 1987, 101 Stat. 1285; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7042, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4399; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, § 2509, title XXXV, § 3595, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4863, 4931; Pub. L. 103–272, § 5(e)(12), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1374; Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §§ 40504, 40505, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1947; Pub. L. 104–132, title II, § 205(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1229; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 601(r)(1), (2), 605(l), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3502, 3510; Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXVI, § 3613(c), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1230; Pub. L. 109–59, title VII, § 7128(b), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1910; Pub. L. 110–326, title II, § 202, Sept. 26, 2008, 122 Stat. 3561.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Controlled Substances Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(4), is title II of Pub. L. 91–513, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1242, which is classified principally to subchapter I (§ 801 et seq.) of chapter 13 of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 801 of Title 21 and Tables.

Amendments

2008—Subsec. (b)(6). Pub. L. 110–326 added par. (6).

2005—Subsec. (a)(1)(A). Pub. L. 109–59 inserted “5124,” before “46312,”.

2000—Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 106–310 inserted “which may be” after “fine”.

1996—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 104–132, § 205(a)(1)(A)–(E), substituted “(a)(1)(A) The court” for “(a)(1) The court”, inserted “, section 401, 408(a), 409, 416, 420, or 422(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841, 848(a), 849, 856, 861, 863) (but in no case shall a participant in an offense under such sections be considered a victim of such offense under this section),” before “or section 46312,”, “other than an offense described in section 3663A(c),” after “title 49”, and “, or if the victim is deceased, to the victim’s estate” before period at end, and added subpar. (B).

Subsec. (a)(1)(A). Pub. L. 104–294, § 601(r)(1), inserted at end “The court may also order, if agreed to by the parties in a plea agreement, restitution to persons other than the victim of the offense.”

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 104–132, § 205(a)(1)(F), as amended by Pub. L. 104–294, § 605(l), amended par. (2) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (2) read as follows: “For the purposes of restitution, a victim of an offense that involves as an element a scheme, a conspiracy, or a pattern of criminal activity means any person directly harmed by the defendant’s criminal conduct in the course of the scheme, conspiracy, or pattern.”

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–132, § 205(a)(2), (3), added subsec. (c) and struck out former subsec. (c) which read as follows: “If the court decides to order restitution under this section, the court shall, if the victim is deceased, order that the restitution be made to the victim’s estate.”

Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 104–294, § 601(r)(2), inserted “or chapter 96” after “under chapter 46”.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–132, § 205(a)(2), (3), added subsec. (d) and struck out former subsec. (d) which read as follows: “To the extent that the court determines that the complication and prolongation of the sentencing process resulting from the fashioning of an order of restitution under this section outweighs the need to provide restitution to any victims, the court may decline to make such an order.”

Subsecs. (e) to (i). Pub. L. 104–132, § 205(a)(2), struck out subsecs. (e) to (i), relating to provisions for restitution to persons who had compensated victims for their loss as well as offsets for restitution received by victims against amounts later recovered as compensatory damages, court orders that defendant make restitution in specified time period or in specified installments, payment of restitution as condition of probation or of supervised release, enforcement of restitution orders by United States or by victim, and supervision, termination, or restoration of eligibility for Federal benefits of persons delinquent in making restitution, respectively.

1994—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 103–272 substituted “section 46312, 46502, or 46504 of title 49” for “under subsection (h), (i), (j), or (n) of section 902 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1472)”.

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 103–322, § 40504(1), in introductory provisions, inserted “including an offense under chapter 109A or chapter 110” after “victim”.

Subsec. (b)(3) to (5). Pub. L. 103–322, § 40504(2)–(4), struck out “and” at end of par. (3), added par. (4), and redesignated former par. (4) as (5).

Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 103–322, § 40505, added subsec. (i).

1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–647, § 2509, designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added pars. (2) and (3).

Subsec. (f)(4). Pub. L. 101–647, § 3595, substituted “604(a)(18)” for “604(a)(17)”.

1988—Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 100–690 amended subsec. (h) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (h) read as follows: “An order of restitution may be enforced by the United States in the manner provided in sections 3812 and 3813 or in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action, and by the victim named in the order to receive the restitution in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action.”

1987—Subsec. (f)(4). Pub. L. 100–185 inserted “or the person designated under section 604(a)(17) of title 28” after “Attorney General”.

Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 100–182 substituted “revoke probation or a term of supervised release,” for “revoke probation,” in two places and inserted “probation or” after “modify the term or conditions of” in two places.

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–646, § 20(a), which directed that subsec. (a)(1) be amended by inserting “, in the case of a misdemeanor,” after “in addition to or”, was executed to subsec. (a) to reflect the probable intent of Congress and the prior amendment to subsec. (a) by Pub. L. 99–646, § 8(b), below.

Pub. L. 99–646, § 8(b), struck out par. (1) designation, and struck out par. (2) which read as follows: “If the court does not order restitution, or orders only partial restitution, under this section, the court shall state on the record the reasons therefor.”

Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 99–646, § 79(a), substituted “such offense” for “the offense”.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 99–646, § 77(a), amended subsec. (d) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (d) read as follows: “The court shall impose an order of restitution to the extent that such order is as fair as possible to the victim and the imposition of such order will not unduly complicate or prolong the sentencing process.”

Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 99–646, § 78(a), substituted “in the manner provided for the collection of fines and penalties by section 3565 or by a victim” for “or a victim”.

1984—Pub. L. 98–473, § 212(a)(1), renumbered section 3579 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–596, § 9(1), substituted “court” for “Court” after “If the”.

Subsec. (f)(4). Pub. L. 98–596, § 9(2), added par. (4).

Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 98–473, § 212(a)(3)(A), amended subsec. (g) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (g) read as follows: “If such defendant is placed on probation or paroled under this title, any restitution ordered under this section shall be a condition of such probation or parole. The court may revoke probation and the Parole Commission may revoke parole if the defendant fails to comply with such order. In determining whether to revoke probation or parole, the court or Parole Commission shall consider the defendant’s employment status, earning ability, financial resources, the willfulness of the defendant’s failure to pay, and any other special circumstances that may have a bearing on the defendant’s ability to pay.”

Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 98–473, § 212(a)(3)(B), amended subsec. (h) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (h) read as follows: “An order of restitution may be enforced by the United States in the manner provided for the collection of fines and penalties by section 3565 or by a victim named in the order to receive the restitution in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action.”

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–132 to be effective, to extent constitutionally permissible, for sentencing proceedings in cases in which defendant is convicted on or after Apr. 24, 1996, see section 211 of Pub. L. 104–132, set out as a note under section 2248 of this title.

Effective Date of 1987 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–182 applicable with respect to offenses committed after Dec. 7, 1987, see section 26 of Pub. L. 100–182, set out as a note under section 3006A of this title.

Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by section 8(b) of Pub. L. 99–646 effective Nov. 1, 1987, see section 8(c) of Pub. L. 99–646, set out as a note under section 3553 of this title.

Amendment by section 20(a) of Pub. L. 99–646 effective Nov. 1, 1987, see section 20(c) of Pub. L. 99–646, set out as a note under section 3556 of this title.

Pub. L. 99–646, § 77(b), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3618, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect on the 30th day after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 10, 1986].”

Pub. L. 99–646, § 78(b), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3618, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect on the 30th day after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 10, 1986].”

Pub. L. 99–646, § 79(b), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3619, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 10, 1986].”

Effective Date of 1984 Amendments

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–596 applicable to offenses committed after Dec. 31, 1984, see section 10 of Pub. L. 98–596.

Amendment by section 212(a)(3) of Pub. L. 98–473 effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such amendment, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of this title.

Effective Date

Section effective with respect to offenses occurring after Jan. 1, 1983, see section 9(b)(2) of Pub. L. 97–291, set out as a note under section 1512 of this title.

Profit by a Criminal From Sale of His Story

Pub. L. 97–291, § 7, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1257, required the Attorney General to report, by Oct. 12, 1982, to Congress regarding any laws that are necessary to ensure that no Federal felon derives any profit from the sale of the recollections, thoughts, and feelings of such felon with regards to the offense committed by the felon until any victim of the offense receives restitution.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,491 cases (109 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: Huml v. Vlazny, 2006 WI 87 (Wis. 2006).
Huml v. Vlazny, 2006 WI 87 (Wis. 2006). · cites it 18× “20(1r) was based in part on the federal VWPA, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (h) (1982 & Supp. IV 1987).”
Barrett N. Weinberger v. United States, 268 F.3d 346 (6th Cir. 2001). · cites it 11× “The district court overruled the objection as moot on the basis that the court was applying the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA), 18 U.S.C. § 3663 , which was in effect in 1994, in ordering Wein-berger to pay full restitution to the victims and to the IRS.”
United States v. Leahy, 438 F.3d 328 (3rd Cir. 2006). · cites it 10× “18 U.S.C. § 3663 . 4 Passed by Congress in 1996, the MVRA augmented and partially superseded the VWPA by requiring district courts to impose restitution on defendants convicted of certain offenses without regard to their ability to pay.”
United States v. Jerry D. Smith, 944 F.2d 618 (9th Cir. 1991). · cites it 13× “The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663 and 3664. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.”
United States v. Joshua Sizemore, 850 F.3d 821 (6th Cir. 2017). · cites it 14× “The probation office assessed restitution, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663 , in the amount of $230,839.”
United States v. Atl. States Cast Iron Pipe Co., 612 F. Supp. 2d 453 (D.N.J. 2009). · cites it 22× “John Kyi, has explained that “the CVRA’s definition of a crime victim is based on the federal restitution statutes,” citing the Victim and Witness Protection Act (‘VWPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663 , and the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act *461 (“MVRA”), 18 U.”
United States v. Youssef Abdelbary, 746 F.3d 570 (4th Cir. 2014). · cites it 23× “The district court cited both the voluntary, 18 U.S.C. § 3663 , and mandatory, 18 U.S.”
United States v. Nancy Jacques, 321 F.3d 255 (2d Cir. 2003). · cites it 12× “In a rider to the plea agreement, Jacques agreed that “[t]he Court may order that the defendant make restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663 .” The Presentence Investigation Report (presentence report), prepared by the Probation Office, contained the following information pertinent…”
United States v. Josephine L. Broughton-Jones, A/K/A Josie Broughton, 71 F.3d 1143 (4th Cir. 1995). · cites it 9× “More specifically, she points out that 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (a)(1) authorizes a district court to order restitution only for losses traceable to a defendant’s offense of conviction.”
United States v. Battista, 575 F.3d 226 (2d Cir. 2009). · cites it 14× “§ 3663A, or the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (“VWPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663 . The court determined that Battista’s crime was covered by the MVRA, which applies to “offense[s] committed by fraud or deceit,” 18 U.”
Terrence Johnson v. Phil Bredesen, 624 F.3d 742 (6th Cir. 2010). · cites it 8× “1994) (citing 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663 , 3664). Although an order of restitution under the VWPA is typically paid to and for the benefit of the victim of the crime, id.”
John W. Gall v. United States, 21 F.3d 107 (6th Cir. 1994). · cites it 9× “The district court held that Gall’s restitution was properly ordered as a special condition of supervised release, not as restitution under the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (‘VWPA”), 18 U.”
United States v. Rostoff, 164 F.3d 63 (1st Cir. 1999). · cites it 15× “, to obtain a civil judgment in the amount of the Rostoffs’ outstanding obligations under an order of restitution previously issued pursuant to a provision of the Victim Witness Protection Act (“VWPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663 . We affirm in part and vacate and remand to the district…”
United States v. Tsosie, 639 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 10× “shall order the defendant to make restitution to any victim of the offense, unless, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663 , the court determines that restitution would not be appropriate in the case.”
United States v. Rachel Shannon Sosebee (03-1923) & Jack P. Farris (03-2219), 419 F.3d 451 (6th Cir. 2005). · cites it 6× “On appeal, Sose-bee nevertheless claims that the restitution was improperly imposed under the restrictions of 18 U.S.C. § 3663 and § 3663A, and she requests that the restitution order be stricken from the district court’s judgment.”
United States v. Willie James Blake, Jr., 81 F.3d 498 (4th Cir. 1996). · cites it 7× “See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3663 (West 1985 & Supp.1995); U.”
United States v. Bradford Lee Butler, 297 F.3d 505 (6th Cir. 2002). · cites it 8× “Butler *518 argues on appeal that the district court erred by failing to specify the amount of restitution, and, furthermore, that the district court did not have the authority to order restitution under the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA), as codified at 18 U.S.C. §§…”
United States v. Papagno, 639 F.3d 1093 (D.C. Cir. 2011). · cites it 9× “1248 , 1253 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3663 ). A product of the victims’ rights movement that had picked up steam in the 1970s, that Act provides federal courts with discretionary authority to order restitution to victims of most federal crimes.”
United States v. Newell, 658 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2011). · cites it 5× “In addition, under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3663 , the court imposed a restitution order of $1,741,876.”
United States v. Dorcely, Daniel, 454 F.3d 366 (D.C. Cir. 2006). · cites it 5× “Although the district court incorrectly ordered restitution under section 3663A, we note that the order would also be improper under the permissive restitution provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3663 . 8 This provision permits (but does not require) the district court to order “the…”
United States v. Harvey, 532 F.3d 326 (4th Cir. 2008). · cites it 4× “00 to INSCOM was erroneous because (1) no actual loss to the government could be calculated in this case; (2) the court failed to take into account the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (b), and failed to “key its findings” to these factors; and (3) the court imposed a…”
United States v. McNair, 605 F.3d 1152 (11th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4× “We pause to point out here that 18 U.S.C. § 3663 is the Victim & Witness Protection Act (“VWPA”), not the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (“MVRA”), and the substance of McNair’s argument comes from the VWPA.”
United States v. Jose Fuentes, 107 F.3d 1515 (11th Cir. 1997). · cites it 9× “See 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (a)(1). To determine the amount of restitution, if any, the sentencing court “shall consider the amount of the loss sustained by any victim as a result of the offense, the financial resources of the defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the…”
United States v. Robert U. Syme, 276 F.3d 131 (3rd Cir. 2002). · cites it 4× “Did the Restitution Order Violate Apprendi? The District Court ordered Syme to pay $100,000 in restitution to the HCFA (a $300,000 restitution order less a $200,000 credit) pursuant to the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA), 18 U.S.C. § 3663 . Syme contends that the…”
United States v. Anderson, 491 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2007). · cites it 19× “In that brief, the government argued that the Court nevertheless could order restitution based on a provision of the Victim and Witness Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (a)(3), that provides that a court may order restitution “in any criminal case to the extent agreed to by the…”
United States v. George W. Jewett, Jr., 978 F.2d 248 (6th Cir. 1992). · cites it 11× “18 U.S.C. § 3663 (a)(1) (1988). Jewett argues that the amount of restitution ordered was impermissible under the terms of the VWPA and in light of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Act in Hughey v.”
United States v. Jack A. Day, 418 F.3d 746 (7th Cir. 2005). · cites it 7× “Day pleaded guilty is found at 18 U.S.C. § 3663 , which originally was enacted through the Victims and Witnesses Protection Act (“VWPA”).”
United States v. Michael Norwood, 49 F.4th 189 (3rd Cir. 2022). · cites it 8× “” 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (a)(1) (1994). Such restitution orders, in turn, could be enforced by the United States “in the manner provided for the collection and payment of fines in subchapter B of chapter 229 of this title.”
United States v. Maggie Powell, 354 F.3d 362 (5th Cir. 2003). · cites it 4× “06 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663 , also known as the Victim and Witness Protection Act (“VWPA”).”
United States v. David Diaz, 865 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 2017). · cites it 8× “Diaz argued instead that his crime was covered by the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA), 18 U.S.C. § 3663 , and thus the district court retained discretion in deciding whether to impose restitution and the amount of restitution it would require Diaz to pay.”
Jane Doe v. Alan Hesketh, 828 F.3d 159 (3rd Cir. 2016). · cites it 3× “He also agreed to pay “mandatory restitution” to Doe “under the Victim-Witness Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663 , 3663A and 3664” in the amount of $200,000.”
United States v. Steven Ira Cohen, 459 F.3d 490 (4th Cir. 2006). · cites it 5× “of the plea agreement, respectively, Cohen agreed, without qualification, “[t]o plead guilty to counts sixteen and seventeen of the [First Indictment], filed January 14, 2004; and count one of the [Second] In *493 dictment filed April 15, 2004,” and “[t]o make restitution to any…”
United States v. Timothy Ritchie, 858 F.3d 201 (4th Cir. 2017). · cites it 4× “The plea agreement identified the following as possible bases for restitution: (1) the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (“VWPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663 ; (2) the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (“MVRA”), 18 U.”
United States v. Hassebrock, 663 F.3d 906 (7th Cir. 2011). · cites it 5× “The government properly acknowledges that restitution is not permitted pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663 or 18 U.S.C. § 3663A for offenses that fall within Title 26 of United States Code.”
United States v. Peter Arvanitis, Stanley Peters, John Yannakis, Perikles Panagiotaros, & Robert Richards, 902 F.2d 489 (7th Cir. 1990). · cites it 6× “As is [the government’s] duty under the [Victim Witness and Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663 , 3664], [the government] will call to the Court’s attention the identity of all victims and their monetary losses and whatever restitution is required to make them whole.”
United States v. James Frith, Jr., 461 F.3d 914 (7th Cir. 2006). · cites it 5× “The discretionary restitution provision, § 3663, was enacted in 1982 through the Victims and Witnesses Protection Act (“VWPA”).”
United States v. Lionel Reifler, Glenn B. Laken, John M. Black, Jr., 446 F.3d 65 (2d Cir. 2006). · cites it 3× “We note that thus far all of our Sister Circuits that have considered similar challenges to restitution orders entered under the MVRA — or under the Victim and Witness Protection Act (“VWPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (a)(1)(A), pursuant to which the sentencing court “may” order…”
United States v. Benjamin Robers, 698 F.3d 937 (7th Cir. 2012). · cites it 7× “Smith should receive credit against the restitution amount for the value of the collateral property as of the date title to the property was transferred to either Savings & Loan or Gibraltar.”
United States v. Jervis Davis, 714 F.3d 809 (4th Cir. 2013). · cites it 8× “In doing so, he entered into a written plea agreement by which he agreed “[t]o make restitution to any victim in whatever amount the Court may order, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663 and 3663A.” The United States Probation Office conducted a presentence investigation and prepared a…”
United States v. James L. Diamond, 969 F.2d 961 (10th Cir. 1992). · cites it 8× “Diamond claims, inter alia, the district court exceeded its jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3663 by directing him to pay restitution for losses caused by conduct other than the specific offense for which he stood convicted.”
United States v. Monzel, 641 F.3d 528 (D.C. Cir. 2011). · cites it 4×
United States v. Tamny Westbrooks, 858 F.3d 317 (5th Cir. 2017). · cites it 4×
United States v. Elvis E. Webb, 30 F.3d 687 (6th Cir. 1994). · cites it 6×
United States v. Idema, 118 F. App'x 740 (4th Cir. 2005). · cites it 5×
United States v. Mary Ann Grice, 319 F.3d 1174 (9th Cir. 2003). · cites it 6×
United States v. Hawes, 523 F.3d 245 (3rd Cir. 2008). · cites it 6×
Bernhard Dohrmann v. United States, 442 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2006). · cites it 4×
United States v. Carol J. Lampien, 89 F.3d 1316 (7th Cir. 1996). · cites it 11×
United States v. Amato, 540 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. 2008). · cites it 4×
United States v. Tommie Huff, 609 F.3d 1240 (11th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Ronald v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846 (9th Cir. 1989). · cites it 5×
United States v. Leonel Ruiz-Lopez, 53 F.4th 400 (6th Cir. 2022). · cites it 9×
United States v. Mark Sawyer, 825 F.3d 287 (6th Cir. 2016). · cites it 3×
United States v. Elson, 577 F.3d 713 (6th Cir. 2009). · cites it 4×
United States v. Gossi, 608 F.3d 574 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 6×
United States v. Fu Sheng Kuo, 620 F.3d 1158 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 5×
United States v. Neil A. Thomsen, 830 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2016). · cites it 3×
United States v. Allen, 529 F.3d 390 (7th Cir. 2008). · cites it 4×
United States v. Donald Catherine, 55 F.3d 1462 (9th Cir. 1995). · cites it 7×
United States v. David Guardino, 972 F.2d 682 (6th Cir. 1992). · cites it 6×
United States v. Paul J. Savoie, 985 F.2d 612 (1st Cir. 1993). · cites it 4×
United States v. Monroe Melvin Husky, Jr., 924 F.2d 223 (11th Cir. 1991). · cites it 9× “1985), the Ninth Circuit held that the list of compensable injuries in 18 U.S. C.A. § 3663(b)(2) is exclusive: Unlike an award of damages in a civil action, a restitution order under the Act may compensate only for the kind of harms enumerated in [ 18 U.”
United States v. Acosta, 303 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2002). · cites it 5×
United States v. Richard Joseph Kones, Michele Harris, 77 F.3d 66 (3rd Cir. 1996). · cites it 6×
United States v. Quarrell, 310 F.3d 664 (10th Cir. 2002). · cites it 3×
United States v. Ridgeway, 489 F.3d 732 (5th Cir. 2007). · cites it 6×
United States v. Jon R. Guthrie, A/K/A Jay Roland, 64 F.3d 1510 (10th Cir. 1995). · cites it 7×
United States v. Antonakopoulos, 399 F.3d 68 (1st Cir. 2005). · cites it 2×
United States v. Bernard Addison Bailey, 975 F.2d 1028 (4th Cir. 1992). · cites it 5×
United States v. Maturin, 488 F.3d 657 (5th Cir. 2007). · cites it 3×
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Richard E. Dover, 453 F.3d 710 (6th Cir. 2006). · cites it 9×
United States v. Richard Lee Mills, 991 F.2d 609 (9th Cir. 1993). · cites it 4×
United States v. Victoria Kaye Johnson, A/K/A Victoria Kaye S., 48 F.3d 806 (4th Cir. 1995). · cites it 4×
United States v. Marino, 654 F.3d 310 (2d Cir. 2011). · cites it 4×
United States v. Willie A. Newman, 144 F.3d 531 (7th Cir. 1998). · cites it 4×
United States v. Donaghy, 570 F. Supp. 2d 411 (E.D.N.Y 2008). · cites it 10×
United States v. Mary M. Porter, 90 F.3d 64 (2d Cir. 1996). · cites it 7×
United States v. Nossan, 647 F.3d 822 (8th Cir. 2011). · cites it 8×
United States v. Bedonie, 317 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (D. Utah 2004). · cites it 6×
United States v. Batson, 608 F.3d 630 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Roger Lussier, 104 F.3d 32 (2d Cir. 1997). · cites it 4×
United States v. Serawop, 505 F.3d 1112 (10th Cir. 2007). · cites it 3×
Martin v. State, 874 S.W.2d 674 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). · cites it 4×
United States v. Ferranti, 928 F. Supp. 206 (E.D.N.Y 1996). · cites it 8×
United States v. Waknine, 543 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2×
United States v. Johnson, 541 F.3d 1064 (11th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2×
United States v. Gibbens, 25 F.3d 28 (1st Cir. 1994). · cites it 4×
United States v. William P. Clark, 787 F.3d 451 (7th Cir. 2015). · cites it 5×
United States v. Nichols, 169 F.3d 1255 (10th Cir. 1999). · cites it 3×
United States v. Francis A. Koeberlein, 161 F.3d 946 (6th Cir. 1998). · cites it 3×
United States v. Abiodun T. Giwah, 84 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 1996). · cites it 6×
United States v. Grahame P. Sanders, Cross-Appellee, 95 F.3d 449 (6th Cir. 1996). · cites it 4×
Daryl E. Ratliff v. United States, 999 F.2d 1023 (6th Cir. 1993). · cites it 3×
United States v. Larry James Reynolds, 432 F.3d 821 (8th Cir. 2005). · cites it 7×
United States v. Steven C. Streebing, 987 F.2d 368 (6th Cir. 1993). · cites it 5×
United States v. Leftwich, 628 F.3d 665 (4th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Mousseau, 517 F.3d 1044 (8th Cir. 2008). · cites it 4×
United States v. Baggett, 125 F.3d 1319 (9th Cir. 1997). · cites it 5×
United States v. James T. Dickerson, 370 F.3d 1330 (11th Cir. 2004). · cites it 3×
United States v. Cole Cameron Cummings, AKA Coleman Cameron Cummings, 281 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2002). · cites it 3×
United States v. Gutierrez-Avascal, 542 F.3d 495 (5th Cir. 2008). · cites it 8×
United States v. Witham, 648 F.3d 40 (1st Cir. 2011). · cites it 7×
United States v. Dominic Demarcus Steele, 897 F.3d 606 (4th Cir. 2018). · cites it 3×
United States v. Blanchard, 618 F.3d 562 (6th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3×
United States v. Robert S. Gordon, 393 F.3d 1044 (9th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2×
United States v. Helen L. Lively, A/K/A Helen Flugga, 20 F.3d 193 (6th Cir. 1994). · cites it 4×
United States v. Ione E. Fogg, 409 F.3d 1022 (8th Cir. 2005). · cites it 3×
United States v. Bussell, 504 F.3d 956 (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 3×
State v. Hunziker, 56 P.3d 202 (Kan. 2002). · cites it 3×
United States v. Robert Freeman, 741 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 2014). · cites it 5×
United States v. Jacob De La Fuente, 353 F.3d 766 (9th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
Westley Brian Cani v. United States, 331 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2003). · cites it 3×
United States v. Renard L. Washington, 434 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 2006). · cites it 3×
United States v. Donald Turner, 718 F.3d 226 (3rd Cir. 2013). · cites it 3×
United States v. Lindani Mzembe, 933 F.3d 796 (7th Cir. 2019). · cites it 2×
United States v. Frasiel Hughey, 147 F.3d 423 (5th Cir. 1998). · cites it 3×
United States v. Louis Malpeso, Jr., 126 F.3d 92 (2d Cir. 1997). · cites it 7×
United States v. James Carpenter, 359 F. App'x 553 (6th Cir. 2009). · cites it 5×
United States v. Coleman, 370 F. Supp. 2d 661 (S.D. Ohio 2005). · cites it 4×
United States v. Ernest J. Badaracco, Jr., 954 F.2d 928 (3rd Cir. 1992). · cites it 3×
United States v. Valdes-Ayala, 900 F.3d 20 (1st Cir. 2018). · cites it 3×
United States v. Fumo, 655 F.3d 288 (3rd Cir. 2011). · cites it 2×
United States v. Cummings, 189 F. Supp. 2d 67 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). · cites it 9×
United States v. Gerald Boutcher, 998 F.3d 603 (4th Cir. 2021).
United States v. Mobley, 971 F.3d 1187 (10th Cir. 2020). · cites it 2×
United States v. Daniel D. Rand, 403 F.3d 489 (7th Cir. 2005). · cites it 4×
United States v. Philip J. Menza, 137 F.3d 533 (7th Cir. 1998). · cites it 4×
United States v. Arthur Turcks, 41 F.3d 893 (3rd Cir. 1994). · cites it 3×
United States v. Martinez, 610 F.3d 1216 (10th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2×
United States v. Timilty, 148 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1998). · cites it 5×
United States v. Harwood, 854 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (D.N.M. 2012). · cites it 20×
United States v. Anderson, 545 F.3d 1072 (D.C. Cir. 2008). · cites it 7×
United States v. Williams, 612 F.3d 500 (6th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2×
United States v. Ernest Moore, 703 F.3d 562 (D.C. Cir. 2012). · cites it 4×
Billy S. Creel, Sr. v. Comr., IRS, 419 F.3d 1135 (11th Cir. 2005). · cites it 3×
United States v. Kenneth Kane, 944 F.2d 1406 (7th Cir. 1991). · cites it 4×
United States v. Leroy Mitchell, 876 F.2d 1178 (5th Cir. 1989). · cites it 4×
United States v. Sharp, 463 F. Supp. 2d 556 (E.D. Va. 2006). · cites it 5×
United States v. Emor, 850 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2012). · cites it 5×
United States v. Daniel Mortimer, 52 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 1995). · cites it 4×
United States v. Charles Young, 953 F.2d 1288 (11th Cir. 1992). · cites it 5×
United States v. Futrell, 209 F.3d 1286 (11th Cir. 2000). · cites it 2×
United States v. Dennis Bright, 353 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2×
United States v. Milton Gottesman, 122 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 1997). · cites it 6×
United States v. Espinoza, 677 F.3d 730 (5th Cir. 2012). · cites it 3×
United States v. Hatten, 167 F.3d 884 (5th Cir. 1999). · cites it 3×
United States v. Taiwo Adeshola Akande, 200 F.3d 136 (3rd Cir. 1999). · cites it 4×
United States v. William H. Randle, 324 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
United States v. Kravchuk, 335 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
United States v. Ian Aza Jerome Owens, 426 F.3d 800 (6th Cir. 2005). · cites it 2×
United States v. Ronald Gillette, 738 F.3d 63 (3rd Cir. 2013). · cites it 3×
United States v. Overholt, 307 F.3d 1231 (10th Cir. 2002). · cites it 2×
United States v. Gerald A. Coates Gerald Coates, 178 F.3d 681 (3rd Cir. 1999). · cites it 3×
United States v. Brown, 665 F.3d 1239 (11th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2×
United States v. Amos Searan & Jeanettia Searan, 259 F.3d 434 (6th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “For the proposition that courts must consider the financial resources of the defendant in determining whether to order restitution, she cites “18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(B)(I),” by which she apparently means 18 U.”
In Re McNulty, 597 F.3d 344 (6th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Lavell Dean, 414 F.3d 725 (7th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Norris, 217 F.3d 262 (5th Cir. 2000). · cites it 3×
United States v. Sean Meacham (93-1692) & Ramone Botello (93-1768), 27 F.3d 214 (6th Cir. 1994). · cites it 3×
In Re: Doe v., 264 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2007). · cites it 6×
Koile v. State, 934 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 2006). · cites it 2×
United States v. Michael A. Cannizzaro, 871 F.2d 809 (9th Cir. 1989). · cites it 3×
United States v. Harry R. Carboni, 204 F.3d 39 (2d Cir. 2000). · cites it 2×
United States v. Chalupnik, 514 F.3d 748 (8th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2×
In Re Rendon Galvis, 564 F.3d 170 (2d Cir. 2009). · cites it 3×
United States v. Siegel, 153 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 1998). · cites it 4×
United States v. Hardy, 707 F. Supp. 2d 597 (W.D. Pa. 2010). · cites it 5×
United States v. Gloria Stevens & Thomas M. McLaughlin Joseph Gall, 211 F.3d 1 (2d Cir. 2000). · cites it 3×
United States v. Adams, 955 F.3d 238 (2d Cir. 2020). · cites it 2×
United States v. Meredith, 52 F.4th 984 (5th Cir. 2022). · cites it 2×
United States v. Antonio Donaby, 349 F.3d 1046 (7th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
Singh v. Attorney Gen. of the United States, 677 F.3d 503 (3rd Cir. 2012). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lazarenko, 624 F.3d 1247 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3×
United States v. Gianelli, 543 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2×
United States v. Kenneth F. Boula & Earl D. Gordon, 997 F.2d 263 (7th Cir. 1993). · cites it 3×
United States v. Williams, 10 F.4th 965 (10th Cir. 2021). · cites it 3×
United States v. James D. Wainwright, 938 F.2d 1096 (10th Cir. 1991). · cites it 3×
United States v. Henry Lo, 839 F.3d 777 (9th Cir. 2016).
United States v. David E. Kinlock, 174 F.3d 297 (2d Cir. 1999). · cites it 3×
United States v. Rollings, 751 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2×
United States v. Rich, 603 F.3d 722 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3×
United States v. Richard Ashton Oslund, 453 F.3d 1048 (8th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2×
United States v. John Anthony Spencer, 700 F.3d 317 (8th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2×
United States v. Robert Martin, 128 F.3d 1188 (7th Cir. 1997). · cites it 5×
United States v. Robert J. Prendergast, Jr., 979 F.2d 1289 (8th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lessner, 498 F.3d 185 (3rd Cir. 2007).
United States v. Louis Rochester, 898 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1990). · cites it 2×
United States v. Douglas Lincoln, 277 F.3d 1112 (9th Cir. 2002). · cites it 3×
United States v. Church, 701 F. Supp. 2d 814 (W.D. Va. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Gary Kovall, 857 F.3d 1060 (9th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2×
United States v. Allen Elias, 269 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2×
United States v. Dean Harvey Hicks, 997 F.2d 594 (9th Cir. 1993). · cites it 2×
United States v. Hector B. Germosen, 139 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 1998). · cites it 2×
United States v. Timothy Gordon Faasse, 265 F.3d 475 (6th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2×
United States v. Woods, 689 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (N.D. Iowa 2010). · cites it 5×
United States v. Jeffrey Jay Rutgard, 116 F.3d 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2×
United States v. Kevin Deneal Cobbs, 967 F.2d 1555 (11th Cir. 1992). · cites it 3×
United States v. Ronald Wesley Daniel, 956 F.2d 540 (6th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2×
United States v. Gilberg, 75 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 1996). · cites it 3×
United States v. Michael Davis (96-5895) & Miles Jones (96-5905), 170 F.3d 617 (6th Cir. 1999). · cites it 3× “18 U.S.C.A § 3663(a)(2) (Supp. 1992). This amended subsection expands the definition of a “victim” in cases such as mail fraud.”
United States v. Manning, 526 F.3d 611 (10th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2×
United States v. Varrone, 554 F.3d 327 (2d Cir. 2009). · cites it 2×
United States v. David Devon Davis, 306 F.3d 398 (6th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Lee Roy Mullins, Jr., 971 F.2d 1138 (4th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2×
Julius Obasohan v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 479 F.3d 785 (11th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2×
United States v. Pescatore, 637 F.3d 128 (2d Cir. 2011). · cites it 2×
United States v. Remillong, 55 F.3d 572 (11th Cir. 1995). · cites it 3×
United States v. Bernard Gelb, 944 F.2d 52 (2d Cir. 1991). · cites it 3×
United States v. James E. Wells, 177 F.3d 603 (7th Cir. 1999). · cites it 5×
United States v. Louis G. Reese, III, 998 F.2d 1275 (5th Cir. 1993). · cites it 3×
United States v. Lawrence John Pizzichiello, 272 F.3d 1232 (9th Cir. 2002). · cites it 2×
United States v. Luiz Ben Zvi, 242 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2001).
United States v. Marks, 530 F.3d 799 (9th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Vaknin, 112 F.3d 579 (1st Cir. 1997). · cites it 2×
United States v. Syed Sami Ahmad, 2 F.3d 245 (7th Cir. 1993). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lawrence Snider, 957 F.2d 703 (9th Cir. 1992). · cites it 3×
United States v. Elvis C. Stout, 32 F.3d 901 (5th Cir. 1994). · cites it 3×
United States of Am. v. Edmond Xavier Ramirez, Sr., 196 F.3d 895 (8th Cir. 1999). · cites it 3×
United States v. Thomas Edward Karam, 201 F.3d 320 (4th Cir. 2000). · cites it 3×
United States v. Donald Davenport, 445 F.3d 366 (4th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Brian Berardini, 112 F.3d 606 (2d Cir. 1997). · cites it 4×
United States v. Cothran, 302 F.3d 279 (5th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Wooten, 377 F.3d 1134 (10th Cir. 2004).
United States v. Bill Lawrence, 189 F.3d 838 (9th Cir. 1999). · cites it 2×
United States v. Troy Vaval, AKA Just. Vaval, 404 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 2005).
United States v. Milton F. Duvall, III, 926 F.2d 875 (9th Cir. 1991). · cites it 4×
United States v. Cannistraro, 694 F. Supp. 62 (D.N.J. 1988). · cites it 4×
United States v. Melinda Barany, 884 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir. 1989). · cites it 2×
In Re the Marriage of Loscher, 182 P.3d 25 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 3×
United States v. Emaeyek Ekanem, 383 F.3d 40 (2d Cir. 2004). · cites it 2×
United States v. Elbea Malone, 747 F.3d 481 (7th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2×
United States v. George Koutsostamatis, 956 F.3d 301 (5th Cir. 2020). · cites it 2×
In Re Amigoni, 109 B.R. 341 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1989). · cites it 5×
United States v. Cornier-Ortiz, 361 F.3d 29 (1st Cir. 2004). · cites it 2×
United States v. Parse, 789 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2015). · cites it 2×
United States v. Est. of Parsons ex rel. Millar, 314 F.3d 745 (5th Cir. 2002). · cites it 4×
United States v. Collins, 209 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1999). · cites it 3×
United States v. Gary Allen Reichow, 416 F.3d 802 (8th Cir. 2005). · cites it 2×
United States v. Roush, 452 F. Supp. 2d 676 (N.D. Tex. 2006). · cites it 3×
United States v. Edward Avery Herndon, 982 F.2d 1411 (10th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2×
United States v. Tate, 136 F. App'x 821 (6th Cir. 2005). · cites it 5×
United States v. Holley, 23 F.3d 902 (5th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. Roger Haggard, 41 F.3d 1320 (9th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. William C. Murphy, 28 F.3d 38 (7th Cir. 1994). · cites it 3×
United States v. Thomas C. Scott, 74 F.3d 107 (6th Cir. 1996). · cites it 3×
United States v. Jefferson, 652 F.3d 927 (8th Cir. 2011). · cites it 3×
United States v. Hensley, 91 F.3d 274 (1st Cir. 1996). · cites it 2×
United States v. Francis Boccagna, 450 F.3d 107 (2d Cir. 2006).
United States v. Graden James Miguel, 49 F.3d 505 (9th Cir. 1995). · cites it 3×
Talbott v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 865 F. Supp. 37 (D. Mass. 1994). · cites it 3×
United States v. Daniel J. Balint & James A. Ketchum, 201 F.3d 928 (7th Cir. 2000). · cites it 2×
United States v. Marvin J. Morrison, 938 F.2d 168 (10th Cir. 1991). · cites it 3×
United States v. Thomas Herbert McIlvain, 967 F.2d 1479 (10th Cir. 1992). · cites it 3×
United States v. Robert Dorsey, 27 F.3d 285 (7th Cir. 1994). · cites it 3×
United States v. Stanley Cottman, 142 F.3d 160 (3rd Cir. 1998). · cites it 2×
United States v. John Voigt, 89 F.3d 1050 (3rd Cir. 1996).
United States v. Messner, 107 F.3d 1448 (10th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lee Vernell Jackson, 155 F.3d 942 (8th Cir. 1998). · cites it 2×
United States v. Obasohan, 73 F.3d 309 (11th Cir. 1996). · cites it 3×
United States v. Efren Pangilinan Sanga, 967 F.2d 1332 (9th Cir. 1992). · cites it 3×
United States v. Lebedev, 932 F.3d 40 (2d Cir. 2019).
United States v. Calbat, 266 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Barton, 366 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2×
Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Warrington Marsham, 293 F.3d 114 (3rd Cir. 2002). · cites it 2×
State v. Stachowski, 103 A.3d 618 (Md. 2014). · cites it 2×
United States v. Thompson, 792 F.3d 273 (2d Cir. 2015). · cites it 2×
United States v. Larry D. Barnette, 10 F.3d 1553 (11th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. Rostoff, 956 F. Supp. 38 (D. Mass. 1997). · cites it 7×
United States v. Jack Bearden, 274 F.3d 1031 (6th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Peter Hesser, 800 F.3d 1310 (11th Cir. 2015).
United States v. George R. Cavallo, 790 F.3d 1202 (11th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Rossi, 592 F.3d 372 (2d Cir. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Foley, 508 F.3d 627 (11th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Benally, 19 F.4th 1250 (10th Cir. 2021). · cites it 2×
United States v. Williams, 353 F. Supp. 3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 2019). · cites it 11×
United States v. Howard Allen Feldman, 338 F.3d 212 (3rd Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
United States v. Jerry M. Matt, 838 F.2d 1356 (5th Cir. 1988). · cites it 4×
United States v. Roger Day, Jr., 700 F.3d 713 (4th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Larry D. Owens, 901 F.2d 1457 (8th Cir. 1990). · cites it 3×
United States v. Lester Mattice, 186 F.3d 219 (2d Cir. 1999). · cites it 3×
United States v. Hesham Ismail, 219 F.3d 76 (2d Cir. 2000). · cites it 3×
United States v. Delano, 981 F.3d 1136 (10th Cir. 2020). · cites it 6×
United States v. Evers, 669 F.3d 645 (6th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Johnny Lee Napier, 463 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir. 2006).
United States v. James Smith, 344 F.3d 479 (6th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Finazzo, 850 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2017).
United States v. Moreland, 622 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Danny Lee Teehee, 893 F.2d 271 (10th Cir. 1990). · cites it 2×
United States v. Fred De La Mata, 266 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Yielding, 657 F.3d 688 (8th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Kamadeen Idowu Oladimeji, 463 F.3d 152 (2d Cir. 2006).
United States v. Ovie L. Duncan, 870 F.2d 1532 (10th Cir. 1989). · cites it 3×
United States v. Edward J. Bros., 955 F.2d 493 (7th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2×
United States v. Fred S. Braslawsky, 951 F.2d 149 (7th Cir. 1991). · cites it 4×
United States v. Jeffrey Allen Koonce, 991 F.2d 693 (11th Cir. 1993). · cites it 2×
United States v. Ronald M. Turner, 312 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2002). · cites it 2×
Phillips v. Booker, 76 F. Supp. 2d 1183 (D. Kan. 1999). · cites it 11×
United States v. Granderson, 511 U.S. 39 (1994).
United States v. Lexington Wholesale Co., 71 F. App'x 507 (6th Cir. 2003). · cites it 7×
United States v. Gushlak, 728 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2013).
United States v. Carmella Dawson, 250 F.3d 1048 (7th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2×
United States v. Viju Mathew, 916 F.3d 510 (5th Cir. 2019).
Peter Balogun v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 425 F.3d 1356 (11th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Patricia Hand, 863 F.2d 1100 (3rd Cir. 1988). · cites it 2×
United States v. Irwin Berman & Joseph E. Gussen, 21 F.3d 753 (7th Cir. 1994). · cites it 3×
United States v. Royal, 100 F.3d 1019 (1st Cir. 1996). · cites it 2×
United States v. James Daddato, 996 F.2d 903 (7th Cir. 1993). · cites it 2×
United States v. Malak Khawaja, Zafar Mian, 118 F.3d 1454 (11th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2×
United States v. Jerry Lee Johnston, 199 F.3d 1015 (9th Cir. 1999). · cites it 2×
United States v. Carmichael, 343 F.3d 756 (5th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Wayne Bryant, 655 F.3d 232 (3rd Cir. 2011).
United States v. Rogelio Salcedo-Lopez, 907 F.2d 97 (9th Cir. 1990). · cites it 2×
Kevin Lavin v. United States, 299 F.3d 123 (2d Cir. 2002). · cites it 2×
United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319 (E.D.N.Y 2005). · cites it 2×
United States v. Frederick Charles Miller, 406 F.3d 323 (5th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Webber, 536 F.3d 584 (7th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Abdelhadi, 327 F. Supp. 2d 587 (E.D. Va. 2004). · cites it 3×
United States v. Phillips, 477 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Milkiewicz, 470 F.3d 390 (1st Cir. 2006).
United States v. Virgen-Chavarin, 350 F.3d 1122 (10th Cir. 2003).
State v. Applegate, 976 P.2d 936 (Kan. 1999). · cites it 2×
United States v. Gerald Green, 722 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Charles Phillip Elliott, William Melhorn, 62 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 1995). · cites it 2×
United States v. Zangari, 677 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 2012).
United States v. Vincent Lane, 323 F.3d 568 (7th Cir. 2003).
United States v. John Herman Thiele, 314 F.3d 399 (9th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Robert E. Nolen, 472 F.3d 362 (5th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Kelly, 128 F.4th 387 (2d Cir. 2025). · cites it 3×
Diane Barnickel v. United States, 113 F.3d 704 (7th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Scott Reisdorfer, 731 F.3d 530 (6th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lawrence Lombardo A/K/A Larry Lombardo, 35 F.3d 526 (11th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. Wendell Rice, 954 F.2d 40 (2d Cir. 1992). · cites it 3×
United States v. Hickman, 331 F.3d 439 (5th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Vaghela, 169 F.3d 729 (11th Cir. 1999). · cites it 2×
United States v. Phaneuf, 91 F.3d 255 (1st Cir. 1996). · cites it 2×
State of Iowa v. Darryl B. Shears Jr., 920 N.W.2d 527 (Iowa 2018).
United States v. Alvin Penn, 969 F.3d 450 (5th Cir. 2020).
United States v. Dimitar Petlechkov, 72 F.4th 699 (6th Cir. 2023).
United States v. Pedro Carrillo Payan, 992 F.2d 1387 (5th Cir. 1993). · cites it 2×
United States v. Samuel Scroggins, 880 F.2d 1204 (11th Cir. 1989).
United States v. Michael Lee Osborn, 58 F.3d 387 (8th Cir. 1995). · cites it 4×
United States v. Wilfong, 551 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2×
United States v. Kearney, 672 F.3d 81 (1st Cir. 2012).
United States v. Silvio Spallone, 399 F.3d 415 (2d Cir. 2005).
United States v. Donald Behrman, 235 F.3d 1049 (7th Cir. 2000).
United States v. Steve D. Caldwell, 302 F.3d 399 (5th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Harriet Jinwright, 683 F.3d 471 (4th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Brock-Davis, 504 F.3d 991 (9th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Tori K. Collins, 854 F.3d 1324 (11th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Sidney D. Furst, 918 F.2d 400 (3rd Cir. 1990). · cites it 2×
United States v. Ronald L. Tunning, 69 F.3d 107 (6th Cir. 1995).
United States v. West, 646 F.3d 745 (10th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Pearson, 570 F.3d 480 (2d Cir. 2009).
United States v. Ben R. Bush, Jr., 252 F.3d 959 (8th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2×
United States v. William Quillen, 335 F.3d 219 (3rd Cir. 2003).
United States v. Parsons, 141 F.3d 386 (1st Cir. 1998). · cites it 2×
United States v. Ruben F. Sasnett, 925 F.2d 392 (11th Cir. 1991). · cites it 2×
United States v. Robert Grant, 235 F.3d 95 (2d Cir. 2000). · cites it 2×
United States v. Yeung, 672 F.3d 594 (9th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Edwin David Wood, II, 364 F.3d 704 (6th Cir. 2004).
United States v. Garduno, 506 F.3d 1287 (10th Cir. 2007).
Blaik v. United States, 117 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 1997). · cites it 12×
State v. Borst, 510 N.W.2d 739 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4×
Hester v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 509 (2019).
United States v. Soderling, 970 F.2d 529 (9th Cir. 1992). · cites it 4×
United States v. Debreczeny, 69 F. App'x 702 (6th Cir. 2003). · cites it 3×
United States v. Elda M. Clark, 901 F.2d 855 (10th Cir. 1990). · cites it 2×
United States v. Orlando Berrios, 869 F.2d 25 (2d Cir. 1989). · cites it 3×
State v. Dugan, 534 N.W.2d 897 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 3×
United States v. Moshe Milstein, 481 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 2007). · cites it 2×
United States v. Rickey Benns, 740 F.3d 370 (5th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2×
United States v. Jeff Pawlinski, 374 F.3d 536 (7th Cir. 2004).
United States v. Brenda Jane Plumley, 993 F.2d 1140 (4th Cir. 1993). · cites it 2×
United States v. Austin, 479 F.3d 363 (5th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Heon Seok Lee, 937 F.3d 797 (7th Cir. 2019).
United States v. Ho Ka Yung, 37 F.4th 70 (3rd Cir. 2022).
United States v. Hosking, 567 F.3d 329 (7th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Bruce Rhodes, 330 F.3d 949 (7th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Boring, 557 F.3d 707 (6th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Major Junior Wright, 12 F.3d 70 (6th Cir. 1993). · cites it 2×
United States v. Doris Johnson-Wilder, 29 F.3d 1100 (7th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. William Douglas Lomow, 266 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir. 2001).
State v. Jenkins, 788 N.W.2d 640 (Iowa 2010).
United States v. Freddy J. Williams, 445 F.3d 1302 (11th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Fazal-Ur-Raheman-Fazal, 355 F.3d 40 (1st Cir. 2004).
United States v. Robert Catoggio, Roy Ageloff, 326 F.3d 323 (2d Cir. 2003).
United States v. Dupre, 117 F.3d 810 (5th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Cutter, 313 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2002).
United States v. Mahone, 453 F.3d 68 (1st Cir. 2006).
United States v. Theodore Anthony Cienfuegos, 462 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Seligsohn, 981 F.2d 1418 (3rd Cir. 1992). · cites it 3×
United States v. James Barnett Miller, 77 F.3d 71 (4th Cir. 1996).
United States v. Byran Protho, 41 F.4th 812 (7th Cir. 2022).
United States v. Raymond W. Vance, 868 F.2d 1167 (10th Cir. 1989). · cites it 2×
United States v. Price, 906 F.3d 685 (7th Cir. 2018). · cites it 3×
United States v. Parsons, 367 F.3d 409 (5th Cir. 2004). · cites it 3×
United States v. David S. Bok, 156 F.3d 157 (2d Cir. 1998).
United States v. Griffith, 584 F.3d 1004 (10th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Kevin Esler, 531 F. App'x 502 (5th Cir. 2013). · cites it 3×
United States v. Sabhnani, 566 F. Supp. 2d 139 (E.D.N.Y 2008). · cites it 3×
United States v. Lomas, 392 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2010). · cites it 7×
United States v. Paul Frederick Laney, 189 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 1999).
United States v. Squirrel, 588 F.3d 207 (4th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2×
United States v. Fabian, 798 F. Supp. 2d 647 (D. Maryland 2011). · cites it 2×
United States v. Monzel, 746 F. Supp. 2d 76 (D.D.C. 2010). · cites it 2×
Daugherty v. United States, 212 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (N.D. Okla. 2002). · cites it 4×
United States v. O'Brien, 109 F. App'x 49 (6th Cir. 2004). · cites it 4×
United States v. Morrison, 685 F. Supp. 2d 339 (E.D.N.Y 2010). · cites it 5×
United States v. Paul F. Doering, 759 F.3d 862 (8th Cir. 2014). · cites it 5×
United States v. Gonzalez, 647 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2011).
United States v. Victor Hackett, 311 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Hayes, 32 F.3d 171 (5th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. Corrigan, 912 F.3d 422 (7th Cir. 2019).
United States v. Frank P. Bongiorno, 110 F.3d 132 (1st Cir. 1997). · cites it 2×
United States v. Jess A. Rodrigues, 229 F.3d 842 (9th Cir. 2000). · cites it 2×
United States v. Hussein Nazzal, 644 F. App'x 655 (6th Cir. 2016). · cites it 4×
United States v. Sergio Lagos, 864 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2017). · cites it 4×
Matter of Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa, 2023 NY Slip Op 05503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023). · cites it 4×
United States v. Thomas J. Bernard, 351 F.3d 360 (8th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Larry L. Emerson, 128 F.3d 557 (7th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Mancillas, 172 F.3d 341 (5th Cir. 1999). · cites it 2×
Khalid Khalayleh v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 287 F.3d 978 (10th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Alphas, 785 F.3d 775 (1st Cir. 2015).
United States v. Alzanki, 54 F.3d 994 (1st Cir. 1995).
Smullen v. United States, 94 F.3d 20 (1st Cir. 1996).
United States v. Oceanpro Indus., Ltd., 674 F.3d 323 (4th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2×
United States v. Feldman, 324 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (C.D. Cal. 2004). · cites it 2×
United States v. Gamma Tech Indus., Inc., 265 F.3d 917 (9th Cir. 2001). · cites it 7×
United States v. Diane Allison, 59 F.3d 43 (6th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Moreland, 509 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Koon, 833 F. Supp. 769 (C.D. Cal. 1993). · cites it 2×
United States v. Onyiego, 286 F.3d 249 (5th Cir. 2002).
Treece v. United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 226 (Fed. Cl. 2010).
United States v. Ricky L. Hampshire, 95 F.3d 999 (10th Cir. 1996).
United States v. Laszlo Pomazi, 851 F.2d 244 (9th Cir. 1988).
United States v. McCoy, Joann, 242 F.3d 399 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
United States v. Fogg, 666 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2011).
United States v. Martinez, 978 F. Supp. 1442 (D.N.M. 1997). · cites it 3×
United States v. Anderson, 85 F. Supp. 2d 1084 (D. Kan. 1999). · cites it 3×
United States v. Johnson, Richard, 816 F.2d 918 (3rd Cir. 1987).
United States v. Joshua Belk, 435 F.3d 817 (7th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Aaron Hymas, 780 F.3d 1285 (9th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Anthony, 942 F.3d 955 (10th Cir. 2019).
United States v. John Afriyie, 27 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2022).
United States v. Sepulveda, 64 F.4th 700 (5th Cir. 2023).
United States v. Obet Lagumbay Ramilo, 986 F.2d 333 (9th Cir. 1993).
United States v. Ralph J. Silkowski, 32 F.3d 682 (2d Cir. 1994).
United States v. Musleh, 106 F. App'x 850 (4th Cir. 2004). · cites it 3×
United States v. Marchese, 87 F. App'x 276 (3rd Cir. 2004). · cites it 3×
State v. Guilliams, 90 P.3d 785 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).
United States v. Frasiel L. Hughey, 877 F.2d 1256 (5th Cir. 1989). · cites it 2×
United States v. Loren M. Welsand, 23 F.3d 205 (8th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. Reginald Hallman, 23 F.3d 821 (3rd Cir. 1994).
United States v. Scott A. Reaume, 338 F.3d 577 (6th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Laulette Marie Love, 431 F.3d 477 (5th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Marvin Daniel Hudson, 483 F.3d 707 (10th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Camuti, 78 F.3d 738 (1st Cir. 1996). · cites it 2×
United States v. Arthur Maurello, 76 F.3d 1304 (3rd Cir. 1996).
United States v. David Howard Craig, 181 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 1999). · cites it 3×
State v. Sequeira, 995 P.2d 335 (Haw. App. 2000). · cites it 3×
BT Com. Corp. v. Kochekian (In Re Kochekian), 175 B.R. 883 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 1995). · cites it 3×
United States v. Pruitt, 813 F.3d 90 (2d Cir. 2016).
United States v. Burdi, 414 F.3d 216 (1st Cir. 2005).
United States v. John Doe, 374 F.3d 851 (9th Cir. 2004).
United States v. Jeffrey L. West, 942 F.2d 528 (8th Cir. 1991).
United States v. James B.A. Niven, 952 F.2d 289 (9th Cir. 1991).
United States v. Mary M. Porter, 41 F.3d 68 (2d Cir. 1994).
United States v. Michael J. Grasso, Jr., 381 F.3d 160 (3rd Cir. 2004).
United States v. Glynn, 149 F. App'x 322 (5th Cir. 2005). · cites it 2×
United States v. Ward, 182 F. App'x 779 (10th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2×
United States v. Schmidt, 675 F.3d 1164 (8th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2×
United States v. Tyrus Simon Follet, 269 F.3d 996 (9th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen, 449 F.3d 862 (8th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Simmonds, 235 F.3d 826 (3rd Cir. 2000). · cites it 3×
United States v. Jo Lynn Patty, 992 F.2d 1045 (10th Cir. 1993).
United States v. Lay, 456 F. Supp. 2d 869 (S.D. Tex. 2006). · cites it 4×
United States v. Robert Lee Barndt, 913 F.2d 201 (5th Cir. 1990). · cites it 2×
United States v. George McLeod, III, 972 F.3d 637 (4th Cir. 2020).
United States v. Bradley Matheny, 42 F.4th 837 (8th Cir. 2022).
United States v. George Thompson, 113 F.3d 13 (2d Cir. 1997).
United States v. Clarence Ray Mikolajczyk, 137 F.3d 237 (5th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Theodore, 354 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2003).
United States v. Leandro Pandiello, 184 F.3d 682 (7th Cir. 1999).
United States v. Donald A. Hairston, Sr., 888 F.2d 1349 (11th Cir. 1989).
United States v. Matos, 611 F.3d 31 (1st Cir. 2010).
United States v. Norman Stoerr, 695 F.3d 271 (3rd Cir. 2012).
United States v. William L. Hart, 70 F.3d 854 (6th Cir. 1996).
United States v. Perry G. Blocker, 104 F.3d 720 (5th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Solares, 236 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2000). · cites it 2×
Wayne Levesque v. Edward Brennan & the United States Parole Comm'n, 864 F.2d 515 (7th Cir. 1988). · cites it 2×
United States v. Charles Antoin Novey, 922 F.2d 624 (10th Cir. 1991).
United States v. Osborne, 332 F.3d 1307 (10th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Mees, 640 F.3d 849 (8th Cir. 2011).
United States v. William Marr, 760 F.3d 733 (7th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Gerald Kress, 944 F.2d 155 (3rd Cir. 1991).
United States v. Keith Newman, 148 F.3d 871 (7th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Thomas P. Gifford, 90 F.3d 160 (6th Cir. 1996). · cites it 4×
United States v. Malpeso, 943 F. Supp. 254 (E.D.N.Y 1996). · cites it 4×
United States v. Pepper, 51 F.3d 469 (5th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Patricia R. Sablotny, 21 F.3d 747 (7th Cir. 1994).
United States v. Bp Prods. North Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655 (S.D. Tex. 2009). · cites it 3×
United States v. Daniel, 14 F. App'x 355 (6th Cir. 2001). · cites it 3×
United States v. Ricky Curtis Williams, 128 F.3d 1239 (8th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Richard Tilford, 810 F.3d 370 (5th Cir. 2016).
United States v. Gilpatrick, 548 F.3d 479 (6th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Kaminski, 501 F.3d 655 (6th Cir. 2007).
Duncan v. United States, 493 U.S. 906 (1989).
United States v. Richard, 234 F.3d 763 (1st Cir. 2000).
United States v. Leland L. Studley, 892 F.2d 518 (7th Cir. 1989).
United States v. Henoud, 81 F.3d 484 (4th Cir. 1996). · cites it 3×
United States v. Richard Eugene Landrum, 93 F.3d 122 (4th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2×
Grossoehme v. Cordell, 904 S.W.2d 392 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2×
United States v. Reuben Coleman, & Milton R. Perry, 997 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir. 1993).
United States v. Anthony Cuti, 708 F. App'x 21 (2d Cir. 2017). · cites it 3×
United States v. Chase Zerba, 983 F.3d 983 (8th Cir. 2020). · cites it 3×
United States v. Juan Jimenez, 77 F.3d 95 (5th Cir. 1996).
United States v. Timmy Cliatt, 338 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir. 2003).
United States v. H. Wayne Hayes, Jr., 385 F.3d 1226 (9th Cir. 2004).
United States v. Quillin Porter, 417 F.3d 914 (8th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Alexander, 679 F.3d 721 (8th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Thaddeus Bania, 787 F.3d 1168 (7th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Wright, 639 F.3d 679 (5th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Hagerman, 827 F. Supp. 2d 102 (N.D.N.Y. 2011). · cites it 9×
United States v. Michael F. Logar, 975 F.2d 958 (3rd Cir. 1992).
United States v. Fletcher Sapp & Ronald Sapp, 53 F.3d 1100 (10th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Shondrell Campbell, 552 F. App'x 339 (5th Cir. 2014). · cites it 5×
United States v. Joseph E. Kirkland, III, 853 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1988). · cites it 2×
United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308 (10th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Amy Unknown, 636 F.3d 190 (5th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Lloyd Steven Grissom, 44 F.3d 1507 (10th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Maynard & Ludwig, 743 F.3d 374 (2d Cir. 2014).
United States v. Cecilio Galan, 804 F.3d 1287 (9th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Steven E. Brown & Gary L. Knox, 47 F.3d 198 (7th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Gerald Greger, 98 F.3d 1080 (8th Cir. 1996).
United States v. Hoang Van Tran, & Vicheth Som, 234 F.3d 798 (2d Cir. 2000).
United States v. Julilath Kouangvan, 844 F.3d 996 (8th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Jason Gatlin, 90 F.4th 1050 (11th Cir. 2024).
United States v. Justin Tanner Petersen, 98 F.3d 502 (9th Cir. 1996).
Arnaiz v. Warden, Fed. Satellite Low, 594 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Jeffrey D. Lachowski, 405 F.3d 696 (8th Cir. 2005).
State of Louisiana v. Robert Guidry, 489 F.3d 692 (5th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Jaime Padilla, 186 F.3d 136 (2d Cir. 1999).
United States v. Romines, 204 F.3d 1067 (11th Cir. 2000). · cites it 2×
United States v. Elena Polukhin, 896 F.3d 848 (8th Cir. 2018). · cites it 2×
United States v. Salti, 59 F.4th 1050 (10th Cir. 2023). · cites it 2×
United States v. Brian Hutchison, 22 F.3d 846 (9th Cir. 1993).
United States v. Justin Lee Howard, 759 F.3d 886 (8th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2×
United States v. Stephanie Bevon, 602 F. App'x 147 (5th Cir. 2015). · cites it 2×
Carnesi v. United States, 933 F. Supp. 2d 388 (E.D.N.Y 2013). · cites it 2×
United States v. Cooper, 498 F.3d 1156 (10th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Amador-Huggins, 799 F.3d 124 (1st Cir. 2015).
United States v. Ricardo S. Scarano, 975 F.2d 580 (9th Cir. 1992).
United States v. Koenig, 952 F.2d 267 (9th Cir. 1991). · cites it 2×
United States v. Friedman, 143 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 1998).
United States v. Anton Vetter, 895 F.2d 456 (8th Cir. 1990).
United States v. Harry L. Fore, 169 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 1999).
United States v. Bengis, 631 F.3d 33 (2d Cir. 2011).
United States v. Samuel Ocasio, 750 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Trevor Hinds, 770 F.3d 658 (7th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Winkler, 817 F. Supp. 1530 (D. Kan. 1993). · cites it 7×
United States v. Rowland, 848 F. Supp. 639 (E.D. Va. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. Bold, 412 F. Supp. 2d 818 (S.D. Ohio 2011). · cites it 8×
United States v. Graham, 72 F.3d 352 (3rd Cir. 1995). · cites it 5×
United States v. Mark Hack, 999 F.3d 980 (6th Cir. 2021).
United States v. Donald Bruce McAninch, 994 F.2d 1380 (9th Cir. 1993).
United States v. David Novak, 217 F.3d 566 (8th Cir. 2000).
Talbott v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 63 F.3d 25 (1st Cir. 1995).
United States v. Larry D. Bach, 172 F.3d 520 (7th Cir. 1999).
United States v. Susan L. Allen, 201 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2000).
United States v. Larry M. Lilly, 206 F.3d 756 (7th Cir. 2000).
United States v. Charles Herbert Smith, 47 F.3d 681 (4th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Salim I. Akbani, 151 F.3d 774 (8th Cir. 1998).
United States v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 848 F. Supp. 287 (D. Mass. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. Venneri, 782 F. Supp. 1091 (D. Maryland 1991). · cites it 2×
United States v. Fliegler, 756 F. Supp. 688 (E.D.N.Y 1990). · cites it 2×
United States v. Frank Najjor, 255 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Bloomgren, 42 F. App'x 147 (10th Cir. 2002). · cites it 3×
United States v. Thomas Chisholm Bartsh, 985 F.2d 930 (8th Cir. 1993).
United States v. Bogart, 490 F. Supp. 2d 885 (S.D. Ohio 2007). · cites it 3×
United States v. Cuti, 778 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2014). · cites it 3×
United States v. Andrews, 88 F. App'x 903 (6th Cir. 2004). · cites it 3×
United States v. Bapack, Pauline Ngo, 129 F.3d 1320 (D.C. Cir. 1997).
United States v. Sabretech, Inc., 271 F.3d 1018 (11th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2×
United States v. Brennan, 526 F. Supp. 2d 378 (E.D.N.Y 2007). · cites it 2×
United States v. Mueffelman, 400 F. Supp. 2d 368 (D. Mass. 2005). · cites it 2×
Bautista v. Star Cruises, 696 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (S.D. Fla. 2010). · cites it 2×
United States v. Fred H. Langer, 962 F.2d 592 (7th Cir. 1992).
Polen v. State, 578 N.E.2d 755 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991).
Ragbir v. Holder, 389 F. App'x 80 (2d Cir. 2010).
United States v. Berger, 574 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Einstman, 325 F. Supp. 2d 373 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).
United States v. Lazorwitz, 411 F. Supp. 2d 634 (E.D.N.C. 2005).
United States v. D'Andrea, 107 F.3d 949 (1st Cir. 1997).
United States v. Miell, 744 F. Supp. 2d 961 (N.D. Iowa 2010). · cites it 4×
Lyndonville Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Lussier, 211 F.3d 697 (2d Cir. 2000). · cites it 3×
United States v. Queen Anieze-Smith, 923 F.3d 565 (9th Cir. 2019).
United States v. Jeremy Strobel, 987 F.3d 743 (7th Cir. 2021).
Brianna Marie Peterson v. Mun. of Anchorage, 500 P.3d 314 (Alaska Ct. App. 2021).
United States v. Golino, 956 F. Supp. 359 (E.D.N.Y 1997). · cites it 3×
United States v. Gelb (In Re Gelb), 187 B.R. 87 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1995). · cites it 3×
United States v. McArthur, 108 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Gene E. Barrett, 51 F.3d 86 (7th Cir. 1995). · cites it 2×
United States v. Glen W. Marsh, (Two Cases), 932 F.2d 710 (8th Cir. 1991).
United States v. Purdue Frederick Co., Inc., 495 F. Supp. 2d 569 (W.D. Va. 2007).
People v. Universal Pub. Transp., Inc., 2012 IL App (1st) 073303-B (Ill. App. Ct. 2012).
United States v. Jessie Mae Stone, 948 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1991).
United States v. Robert J. White, 993 F.2d 147 (7th Cir. 1993).
United States v. Grundhoefer, 916 F.2d 788 (2d Cir. 1990). · cites it 2×
United States v. Nissim Mizrachi, 48 F.3d 651 (2d Cir. 1995).
United States v. Schippers, 982 F. Supp. 2d 948 (S.D. Iowa 2013).
United States v. Man Wai Cheng, Kin Wo Cheng, 96 F.3d 654 (2d Cir. 1996). · cites it 2×
United States v. Jeffrey Jay Rutgard, 108 F.3d 1041 (9th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2×
United States v. Christopher, 142 F.3d 46 (1st Cir. 1998).
United States v. Martin D. Perry, 152 F.3d 900 (8th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Padgett, 892 F.2d 445 (6th Cir. 1989).
United States v. Bengimina, 699 F. Supp. 214 (W.D. Mo. 1988). · cites it 4×
United States v. Roy J. Pogue, 865 F.2d 226 (10th Cir. 1989).
United States v. Steve Angelica, 951 F.2d 1007 (9th Cir. 1991).
United States v. Sharon Sue Cook, 952 F.2d 1262 (10th Cir. 1991).
United States v. Richard Henry Clack, 957 F.2d 659 (9th Cir. 1992).
United States v. Johntai Edward Jackson, 189 F.3d 820 (9th Cir. 1999).
United States v. John Perry, 714 F.3d 570 (8th Cir. 2013).
Nat'l Council on Comp. Ins. v. Caro & Graifman, P.C., 259 F. Supp. 2d 172 (D. Conn. 2003).
United States v. Sterling, 225 F. App'x 748 (10th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2×
Geiger v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 487 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (C.D. Cal. 2007). · cites it 2×
United States v. Numisgroup Intern. Corp., 169 F. Supp. 2d 133 (E.D.N.Y 2001). · cites it 2×
Eur. Cmty. v. RJR Nabisco, Inc., 783 F.3d 123 (2d Cir. 2015). · cites it 2×
United States v. Rosario, 7 F.4th 65 (2d Cir. 2021).
United States v. Springer, 28 F.3d 236 (1st Cir. 1994).
United States v. Kevin Lavin, 27 F.3d 40 (2d Cir. 1994).
United States v. Kelvin L. Dunigan, 163 F.3d 979 (6th Cir. 1999).
United States v. Robert G. Joseph, 914 F.2d 780 (6th Cir. 1990).
United States v. Eugene Edward Martin, 221 F.3d 52 (1st Cir. 2000).
State v. Aubert, 811 P.2d 44 (Idaho Ct. App. 1991).
United States v. McGuire, 636 F. App'x 445 (10th Cir. 2016). · cites it 2×
United States v. Tracie Dickey, 52 F.4th 680 (7th Cir. 2022). · cites it 2×
United States v. Johnson, 94 F.4th 434 (5th Cir. 2024). · cites it 2×
United States v. Wayne Hayes, 135 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 1998). · cites it 2×
Columbia Pictures Indus., Inc. v. T & F Enter., Inc., 68 F. Supp. 2d 833 (E.D. Mich. 1999). · cites it 2×
United States v. Gottlieb, 140 F.3d 865 (10th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Daniel M. Firment, 296 F.3d 118 (2d Cir. 2002).
United States v. Faxon, 689 F. Supp. 2d 1344 (S.D. Fla. 2010).
United States v. Younis, 194 F. App'x 302 (6th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Oldham, 13 F. App'x 221 (6th Cir. 2001).
State v. Edelman, 984 P.2d 421 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999).
United States v. Tobin, 28 F. Supp. 2d 674 (D. Mass. 1998). · cites it 5×
United States v. Marvin Dorsey, 61 F.3d 260 (4th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Davis, 117 F.3d 459 (11th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2×
United States v. Dexter Deontate King, 414 F.3d 1329 (11th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Scarboro, 352 F. Supp. 2d 714 (E.D. Va. 2005).
United States v. Carl Kieffer, 794 F.3d 850 (7th Cir. 2015).
United States v. McGinn, 787 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2015).
United States v. Youssef Abdelbary, 496 F. App'x 273 (4th Cir. 2012). · cites it 3×
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Genova, 172 F. Supp. 2d 1001 (N.D. Ill. 2001). · cites it 3×
United States v. James Spambanato, 876 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1989). · cites it 2×
People v. Woodward, 989 P.2d 188 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2×
United States v. Keith Jones, 209 F.3d 991 (7th Cir. 2000).
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Wright (In Re Wright), 87 B.R. 1011 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1988).
In re: Carlos Brown, 932 F.3d 162 (4th Cir. 2019).
United States v. Carri Robertson, 980 F.3d 672 (9th Cir. 2020).
United States v. Rabkin, 315 F.R.D. 159 (E.D.N.Y 2016).
United States v. Teijeiro, 79 F.4th 387 (5th Cir. 2023).
United States v. Joyce Simmons, 420 F. App'x 414 (5th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Grigsby, 579 F. App'x 680 (10th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Johnson, 875 F.3d 422 (9th Cir. 2017). · cites it 3×
United States v. Ferguson, 584 F. Supp. 2d 447 (D. Conn. 2008). · cites it 2×
United States v. Hamburger, 414 F. Supp. 2d 219 (E.D.N.Y 2006). · cites it 2×
United States v. Serawop, 303 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (D. Utah 2004). · cites it 2×
United States v. Sanford Ltd., 878 F. Supp. 2d 137 (D.D.C. 2012). · cites it 2×
United States v. James May, 500 F. App'x 458 (6th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2×
United States v. Coffee, 110 F. App'x 654 (6th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2×
United States v. Cacace, 289 F. App'x 440 (2d Cir. 2008). · cites it 2×
United States v. Ageloff, 809 F. Supp. 2d 89 (E.D.N.Y 2011). · cites it 2×
United States v. Brand, 163 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Gerald R. Showerman, 68 F.3d 1524 (2d Cir. 1995).
State v. Ball, 877 P.2d 955 (Kan. 1994).
United States v. Bissell, 954 F. Supp. 841 (D.N.J. 1996).
United States v. Blake, 89 F. Supp. 2d 328 (E.D.N.Y 2000).
United States v. Garcia-Castillo, 127 F. App'x 385 (10th Cir. 2005).
United States v. James Dierker, 417 F. App'x 515 (6th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Shawn Swor, 728 F.3d 971 (9th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Hawkins, 392 F. Supp. 2d 757 (W.D. Va. 2005).
United States v. Dainius Vysniauskas, 593 F. App'x 518 (6th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Noel Hernandez, 803 F.3d 1341 (11th Cir. 2015).
State v. Cox, 42 P.3d 182 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
United States v. Gaye Flood, 965 F.2d 505 (7th Cir. 1992).
United States v. Kenneth E. Haddock, 50 F.3d 835 (10th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Spicer (In Re Spicer), 155 B.R. 795 (D.D.C. 1993).
United States v. Mindel, 80 F.3d 394 (9th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2×
United States v. Reed, 80 F.3d 1419 (9th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2×
United States v. Gibson, 873 F. Supp. 1339 (N.D. Iowa 1995). · cites it 7×
United States v. Finley, 783 F. Supp. 1123 (N.D. Ill. 1991).
United States v. Garduño, 506 F.3d 1287 (10th Cir. 2007).
United States v. John Elmer Farkas, 935 F.2d 962 (8th Cir. 1991).
United States v. Reinaldo Santos, 93 F.3d 761 (11th Cir. 1996).
State v. Webb, 559 A.2d 658 (Vt. 1989).
United States v. Sonny Austin Ramdeo, 682 F. App'x 751 (11th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Jesus Lopez, 684 F. App'x 375 (5th Cir. 2017).
United States v. James Simon, 952 F.3d 848 (7th Cir. 2020).
United States v. Solis-Vasquez, 10 F.4th 59 (1st Cir. 2021).
United States v. Shamar Betts, 99 F.4th 1048 (7th Cir. 2024).
United States v. Donald K. Abbey, 288 F.3d 515 (2d Cir. 2002).
United States v. Vázquez-Botet, 453 F. Supp. 2d 362 (D.P.R. 2006).
Ortiz v. State, 173 P.3d 430 (Alaska Ct. App. 2007).
United States v. Meredith Lawrence, 557 F. App'x 520 (6th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Campbell, 245 F. App'x 505 (6th Cir. 2007).
State v. Cole, 155 P.3d 739 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
United States v. Exarhos, 135 F.3d 723 (11th Cir. 1998). · cites it 2×
United States v. Paccione, 949 F.2d 1183 (2d Cir. 1991).
United States v. Daniel C. Laughlin, 804 F.2d 1336 (5th Cir. 1986).
United States v. Robert Michael Garcia, 916 F.2d 566 (9th Cir. 1990).
United States v. Brian Douglas Hammer, 967 F.2d 339 (9th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2×
State v. Hufford, 522 N.W.2d 26 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. Chan, 22 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (D. Haw. 1998). · cites it 2×
Am. Express Travel Related Servs. Co. v. Lominac, 158 F.R.D. 376 (E.D. Va. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. Citarelli, 187 F. Supp. 2d 244 (D.N.J. 2002). · cites it 4×
United States v. Lazarenko, 555 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (N.D. Cal. 2008). · cites it 4× “§ 3663A and 18 U.S.C § 3663(a), the Court GRANTS Kiritchen-ko’s request for restitution in the amount of $19,473,309.”
United States v. Witham, 757 F. Supp. 2d 91 (D.N.H. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Guidant LLC, 708 F. Supp. 2d 903 (D. Minnesota 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Michael Leman, 574 F. App'x 699 (6th Cir. 2014). · cites it 4×
Doe v. Hesketh, 77 F. Supp. 3d 440 (E.D. Pa. 2015). · cites it 4×
United States v. Craig, 359 F. App'x 289 (3rd Cir. 2009). · cites it 4×
United States v. Schrimsher, 58 F.3d 608 (11th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Shirley Marie Thompson, 39 F.3d 1103 (10th Cir. 1994).
United States v. Ortiz, 252 F. App'x 664 (5th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Imeh, 291 F. App'x 637 (5th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Lambert, 395 F. App'x 980 (4th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Dale Conrad McQuiston, 307 F.3d 687 (8th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Anthony Munchak, 527 F. App'x 191 (3rd Cir. 2013).
United States v. Stone, 374 F. Supp. 2d 983 (D.N.M. 2005).
United States v. Miell, 744 F. Supp. 2d 904 (N.D. Iowa 2010).
United States v. Gianelli, 519 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2008).
Hsu v. United States, 954 F. Supp. 2d 215 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).
United States v. Cohan, 988 F. Supp. 2d 323 (E.D.N.Y 2013).
State v. Livingston, 899 So. 2d 733 (La. Ct. App. 2005).
United States v. Charles Edkins, 421 F. App'x 511 (6th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2×
United States v. Ronald Bryant, 436 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2×
United States v. Erdil, 230 F. Supp. 2d 292 (E.D.N.Y 2002). · cites it 2×
United States v. Jessica Bagley, 578 F. App'x 343 (5th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2×
United States v. Vigil, 998 F. Supp. 2d 1121 (D.N.M. 2014). · cites it 2× “)(noting that “the Court has discretion to impose restitution for harm to the community for drug-trafficking,” in light of “18 U.S.C. § 3663(c)(1) [ Mating that ‘when sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense described in .”
United States v. Lawrence Snider, 945 F.2d 1108 (9th Cir. 1991).
United States v. Russel J. Lesperance, 25 F.3d 553 (7th Cir. 1994).
United States v. Lov-It Creamery, Inc., 704 F. Supp. 1532 (E.D. Wis. 1989).
United States v. Rostoff, 966 F. Supp. 1275 (D. Mass. 1997). · cites it 3×
United States v. West Indies Transp. Co., Inc., 35 F. Supp. 2d 450 (D.V.I. 1998). · cites it 3×
United States v. Charles Lanphier, 647 F. App'x 418 (5th Cir. 2016). · cites it 2×
United States v. Baig, 654 F. App'x 26 (2d Cir. 2016). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lucas, 134 F.4th 810 (5th Cir. 2025). · cites it 2×
Schloss v. Bouse, 876 F.2d 287 (2d Cir. 1989).
United States v. Anne Stover, 93 F.3d 1379 (8th Cir. 1996). · cites it 8×
United States v. McVeigh, 106 F.3d 325 (10th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Rose, 153 F.3d 208 (5th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Alas, 196 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 1999).
United States v. Floyd, 738 F. Supp. 1256 (D. Minnesota 1990).
Mujahid v. Crabtree, 999 F. Supp. 1398 (D. Or. 1998).
United States v. Lucien, 347 F.3d 45 (2d Cir. 2003).
United States v. Boyd, 222 F.3d 47 (2d Cir. 2000).
United States v. Electrodyne Sys. Corp., 28 F. Supp. 2d 213 (D.N.J. 1998). · cites it 2×
United States v. Isaac McCrumby, 402 F. App'x 961 (5th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Skowron, 529 F. App'x 71 (2d Cir. 2013).
United States v. Agate, 613 F. Supp. 2d 315 (E.D.N.Y 2009).
United States v. Gordon, 334 F. Supp. 2d 581 (D. Del. 2004).
United States v. Benjamin, 125 F. App'x 438 (3rd Cir. 2005).
United States v. Samim Anghaie, 633 F. App'x 514 (11th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Basurto, 117 F. Supp. 3d 1266 (D.N.M. 2015).
United States v. Sheldon Tree Top, 931 F.3d 720 (8th Cir. 2019).
United States v. Aegerion Pharm., Inc., 280 F. Supp. 3d 217 (D. Mass. 2017).
United States v. Caudillo, 110 F.4th 808 (5th Cir. 2024).
United States v. Benjamin Pass, 610 F. App'x 332 (4th Cir. 2015). · cites it 3×
United States v. Michael, 14 F. App'x 619 (6th Cir. 2001). · cites it 3×
United States v. Weimer, 63 F. Supp. 3d 922 (N.D. Iowa 2014). · cites it 3×
United States v. Ronald v. Cloud, 921 F.2d 225 (9th Cir. 1990).
United States v. Shaw, 725 F. Supp. 896 (S.D. Miss. 1989).
United States v. Sclafani, 996 F. Supp. 400 (D.N.J. 1998).
United States v. Costello, 16 F. Supp. 2d 36 (D. Mass. 1998).
United States v. Apex Roofing of Tallahassee, Inc., 49 F.3d 1509 (11th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Daniel G. Holmes, 193 F.3d 200 (3rd Cir. 1999).
Mears v. Marshall, 905 P.2d 1154 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).
United States v. Johnson, 767 F. Supp. 243 (N.D. Ala. 1991).
United States v. Dempsey, 768 F. Supp. 1277 (N.D. Ill. 1991).
United States v. Ofchinick, 883 F.2d 1172 (3rd Cir. 1989).
CNA Ins. Companies v. Caswell-Ross Agency, 497 N.W.2d 633 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4×
United States v. Moreland, 604 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Huddy, 62 F. App'x 903 (10th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Windle, 419 F. App'x 50 (2d Cir. 2011).
United States v. Wright, 668 F.3d 776 (5th Cir. 2011).
Zack Smith, III v. Marina Medina, 498 F. App'x 375 (5th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Dove, 585 F. Supp. 2d 865 (W.D. Va. 2008).
United States v. Damien McDougal, 368 F. App'x 648 (6th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Walker, 149 F. App'x 55 (3rd Cir. 2005).
United States v. McBride, 39 F. App'x 139 (6th Cir. 2002). “McBride nevertheless argues that by citing to “18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)” and “U.S.S.G. § 5El.”
United States v. Toaz, 59 F. App'x 94 (6th Cir. 2003).
Brown v. Wachovia Bank, 244 F.R.D. 16 (D.D.C. 2007).
United States v. Larry Eaves, 849 F.2d 363 (8th Cir. 1988).
United States v. Martin, 827 F. Supp. 232 (S.D.N.Y. 1993).
United States v. Scott J. Gabriele, 24 F.3d 68 (10th Cir. 1994).
United States v. Juv. G.Z., 144 F.3d 1148 (8th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Prodan, 181 B.R. 279 (E.D. Va. 1995).
United States v. Johnson, 657 F. Supp. 358 (D. Conn. 1987).
United States v. Gochis, 196 F.R.D. 519 (N.D. Ill. 2000).
United States v. Hal Saxon McClamma, Jr., 146 F. App'x 446 (11th Cir. 2005). · cites it 2×
United States v. Mejia, 326 F. App'x 710 (4th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2×
United States v. Steven Ferguson, 537 F. App'x 713 (9th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2×
United States v. Rogers, 187 F. Supp. 2d 1376 (N.D. Ga. 2001). · cites it 2×
United States v. St. Germain, 363 F. Supp. 2d 1293 (D. Colo. 2005). · cites it 2×
United States v. Razalan, 725 F. Supp. 2d 636 (E.D. Mich. 2010). · cites it 2×
United States v. Carpenter, 598 F. App'x 576 (10th Cir. 2015). · cites it 2×
United States v. Tawil, 40 F. App'x 531 (9th Cir. 2002). · cites it 2×
United States v. Blair-Torbett, 230 F. App'x 483 (6th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2×
United States v. Shmuckler, 911 F. Supp. 2d 362 (E.D. Va. 2012). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lewis, 104 F.3d 690 (5th Cir. 1996). · cites it 3×
United States v. Livingston, 770 F. Supp. 440 (N.D. Ill. 1991). · cites it 3×
United States v. Joe Smith, 430 F. App'x 357 (5th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Cynthia Curran, 460 F. App'x 722 (9th Cir. 2011).
United States v. W. James Pickett, III, 505 F. App'x 838 (11th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Orlando Hernandez, 525 F. App'x 274 (5th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Bruce Harrison, III, 541 F. App'x 290 (4th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Clayton, 646 F. Supp. 2d 827 (E.D. La. 2009).
United States v. Lambert, 594 F. Supp. 2d 676 (W.D. Va. 2009).
Rines v. United States, 352 F. Supp. 2d 569 (E.D. Pa. 2005).
United States v. Pelletier, 382 F. Supp. 2d 160 (D. Me. 2005).
United States v. Simmons, 544 F. App'x 21 (2d Cir. 2013).
United States v. Lochard, 555 F. App'x 94 (2d Cir. 2014).
United States v. Luis Munoz, 549 F. App'x 552 (7th Cir. 2013).
United States v. William Raymond Miller, II, 432 F. App'x 955 (11th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Gianelli, 55 F. App'x 831 (9th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Sanders, 52 F. Supp. 3d 1329 (N.D. Ga. 2014).
United States v. Vrancea, 136 F. Supp. 3d 378 (E.D.N.Y 2015).
United States v. Klein, 829 F. Supp. 2d 597 (S.D. Ohio 2011).
United States v. Adorno, 950 F. Supp. 2d 426 (E.D.N.Y 2013).
United States v. Exec. Recycling, Inc., 953 F. Supp. 2d 1138 (D. Colo. 2013).
United States v. Courtney Johnson, 682 F. App'x 118 (3rd Cir. 2017).
United States v. Adrian Pena, 683 F. App'x 307 (5th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Tantalus Prentice Toussaint, 686 F. App'x 846 (11th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Cecelia Bradley, 692 F. App'x 118 (4th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Melvin Ada, 700 F. App'x 689 (9th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Samira Jabr, 4 F.4th 97 (D.C. Cir. 2021).
United States v. Gordon K., 257 F.3d 1158 (10th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Kemp, 938 F. Supp. 1554 (N.D. Ala. 1996). · cites it 2×
United States v. Luis Ledesma, 60 F.3d 750 (11th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Maack, 59 F. Supp. 2d 448 (E.D. Pa. 1999).
United States v. King, 246 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2×
United States v. Rhodes, 894 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1995). · cites it 2×
United States v. Fu Sheng Kuo, 588 F.3d 729 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 5×
United States v. Fleischer, 120 F. App'x 865 (2d Cir. 2005). · cites it 2×
United States v. Landrum, 870 F. Supp. 699 (E.D. Va. 1994).
United States v. Mattice, 22 F. Supp. 2d 49 (W.D.N.Y. 1998).
People v. Young, 163 Misc. 2d 72 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1994).
United States v. Savely, 814 F. Supp. 1519 (D. Kan. 1993).
Schueler v. Rayjas Enter., Inc., 847 F. Supp. 1147 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).
United States v. Lazarenko, 624 F.3d 1247 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3×
United States v. Murillo-Bejerano, 564 F.3d 170 (2d Cir. 2009). · cites it 3×
United States v. Cuti, 766 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2014). · cites it 3×
United States v. Charles Looney, 152 F. App'x 849 (11th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Jermaine A. Young, 249 F. App'x 793 (11th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Bryan Benson, 449 F. App'x 400 (5th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Anderson, 483 F. App'x 433 (10th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Dailey, 189 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Tilley, 786 F. Supp. 2d 862 (W.D. Pa. 2011).
United States v. Johnson, 790 F. Supp. 2d 945 (E.D. Wis. 2011).
Davis v. Gov't of the Virgin Islands, 222 F. Supp. 2d 723 (D.V.I. 2002).
United States v. Kline, 199 F. Supp. 2d 922 (D. Minnesota 2002).
Martin v. United States, 175 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (C.D. Ill. 2001).
United States v. Holthaus, 437 F. Supp. 2d 932 (N.D. Iowa 2006).
United States v. Ricardo Brown, 547 F. App'x 150 (3rd Cir. 2013).
United States v. Yesenia Pouparina, 577 F. App'x 939 (11th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Travis Hymas, 605 F. App'x 622 (9th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Lutricia Feast, 614 F. App'x 195 (5th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Charles McKuhn, Jr., 518 F. App'x 375 (6th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Bates, Tanya Kay, 134 F. App'x 955 (7th Cir. 2005). · cites it 4×
United States v. Schmalstig, 41 F. App'x 591 (3rd Cir. 2002).
United States v. Nestor Quinones, 372 F. App'x 34 (11th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Serpico, 20 F. App'x 27 (2d Cir. 2001).
United States v. Watson, 29 F. App'x 455 (9th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Tonawanda Coke Corp., 5 F. Supp. 3d 343 (W.D.N.Y. 2014).
United States v. Dobruna, 146 F. Supp. 3d 458 (E.D.N.Y 2015).
United States v. Whipple, 155 F. Supp. 3d 321 (W.D.N.Y. 2015).
United States v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 893 F. Supp. 2d 848 (S.D. Tex. 2012).
United States v. Robison, 19 F. App'x 490 (9th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2×
United States v. Laws, 88 F. App'x 448 (2d Cir. 2004). · cites it 2×
United States v. David Diaz (4th Cir. 2017). · cites it 8×
United States v. Williams (D.D.C. 2019). · cites it 8×
United States v. Gregory Podlucky, 690 F. App'x 787 (3rd Cir. 2017).
Wilkinson v. Parker, 263 So. 3d 987 (La. Ct. App. 2018).
United States v. Edwards, 162 F.3d 87 (3rd Cir. 1998).
United States v. Donna Epperson, 938 F.2d 1230 (11th Cir. 1991).
United States v. McAlpine, 832 F. Supp. 1426 (D. Kan. 1993). · cites it 4×
United States v. Burger, 773 F. Supp. 289 (D. Kan. 1991).
United States v. Amiel, 889 F. Supp. 615 (E.D.N.Y 1995).
Martin v. Rutledge, 807 F. Supp. 693 (N.D. Ala. 1992).
United States v. Vergara, 62 F. Supp. 2d 1108 (S.D.N.Y. 1999).
United States v. Boateng (5th Cir. 2021). · cites it 6×
United States v. Schrimsher, 58 F.3d 610 (11th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Johannsen, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1135 (S.D. Iowa 1999).
United States v. Blankenship, 179 F. Supp. 3d 647 (S.D.W. Va 2016). · cites it 6×
United States v. Stohr, 816 F. Supp. 705 (N.D. Ala. 1993).
United States v. Giuffrida, 66 F. Supp. 2d 811 (S.D.W. Va 1999).
United States v. Anita Green (6th Cir. 2026). · cites it 6×
United States v. Cocilova, 594 F. Supp. 2d 683 (W.D. Va. 2009). · cites it 9×
Hughey v. United States, 495 U.S. 411 (1990).
United States v. Zia (2d Cir. 2019). · cites it 5×
United States v. Thuna, 382 F. Supp. 3d 166 (2019). · cites it 5×
Jane Doe v. Usdc-Nvl (9th Cir. 2023). · cites it 5×
United States v. Ciccolini, 750 F. Supp. 2d 850 (N.D. Ohio 2010). · cites it 8×
FDIC v. Dover (6th Cir. 2006). · cites it 8×
United States v. Lewis, 113 F. App'x 336 (10th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2×
United States v. Shwayder, 52 F. App'x 886 (9th Cir. 2002). · cites it 2×
United States v. Williams, 911 F. Supp. 504 (N.D. Ala. 1996). · cites it 3×
United States v. Futrell, 209 F.3d 1286 (11th Cir. 2000). · cites it 2×
Sa'eedu Massaquoi v. Jeffrey Thomas, 545 F. App'x 118 (3rd Cir. 2013).
United States v. Stewart, 321 F. Supp. 2d 652 (D. Maryland 2004).
United States v. Lampien, 1 F. App'x 528 (7th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Shaw, 446 F. App'x 357 (2d Cir. 2011). · cites it 7×
United States v. Larry Reynolds (8th Cir. 2005). · cites it 7×
United States v. Ross Farca (9th Cir. 2021). · cites it 4×
Jane Doe v. Usdc-nvl (9th Cir. 2022). · cites it 4×
United States v. Lazaro Candelaria, 671 F. App'x 760 (11th Cir. 2016).
United States v. Eric Opitz, 704 F. App'x 66 (3rd Cir. 2017).
United States v. Rivera-Ortiz, 323 F. Supp. 3d 287 (2018).
United States v. Samuel Ciccolini, 491 F. App'x 529 (6th Cir. 2012). · cites it 6×
United States v. Homaune, 918 F. Supp. 2d 7 (D.D.C. 2013). · cites it 6×
United States v. Sosebee (6th Cir. 2005). · cites it 6×
United States v. Day, Jack A. (7th Cir. 2005). · cites it 6×
United States v. Calabretta, 385 F. App'x 130 (3rd Cir. 2010).
United States v. Sprouse, 58 F. App'x 985 (4th Cir. 2003).
Rines v. United States, 352 F. Supp. 2d 569 (E.D. Pa. 2005).
United States v. O'Neal, 82 F. App'x 980 (5th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
United States v. Hotte, 328 F. App'x 740 (2d Cir. 2009). · cites it 2×
United States v. Joseph Emmett Simmonds, III, 235 F.3d 826 (3rd Cir. 2000). · cites it 3×
United States v. Donald Johnson, 854 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2017). · cites it 3×
United States v. Donald Johnson (9th Cir. 2017). · cites it 3×
United States v. Farai Marunda (5th Cir. 2018). · cites it 3×
United States v. Diwone Nobles (5th Cir. 2018). · cites it 3×
United States v. Martin Mentzer (3rd Cir. 2019). · cites it 3×
United States v. Shaquana Quenella Brookins (11th Cir. 2019). · cites it 3×
United States v. Ryan Kibble (4th Cir. 2021). · cites it 3×
United States v. Jalloul (5th Cir. 2022). · cites it 3×
United States v. Bell (5th Cir. 2022). · cites it 3×
Maasen v. United States (D. Ariz. 2021). · cites it 3×
Cedeno v. Ohio Attorney Gen. Off. (N.D. Ohio 2021). · cites it 3×
United States v. Valko DeSantis (W.D. Va. 2021). · cites it 3×
United States v. Morgan (D.D.C. 2025). · cites it 3×
E. H. v. Hon. Slayton, 568 P.3d 377 (Ariz. 2025). · cites it 3×
United States v. Kevin Jean-Gilles (11th Cir. 2025). · cites it 3×
United States v. Maldonado-Vargas (1st Cir. 2025). · cites it 3×
United States v. Kevin Clay (6th Cir. 2025). · cites it 3×
Joseph White (Tax Ct. 2026). · cites it 3×
United States v. Holcombe, 107 F. App'x 882 (10th Cir. 2004). · cites it 5×
United States v. Joseph DiBruno, Sr., 438 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2011). · cites it 5×
United States v. Cohen (4th Cir. 2006). · cites it 5×
United States v. Frith, James (7th Cir. 2006). · cites it 5×
United States v. Fu Kuo (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 5×
Terrence Johnson v. Phil Bredesen (6th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Divine, 724 F. Supp. 2d 590 (W.D. Va. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Shondrell Campbell (5th Cir. 2014). · cites it 4×
United States v. Rossi (2d Cir. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Elson (6th Cir. 2009). · cites it 4×
Martin McNulty v. (6th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Rand, Daniel D. (7th Cir. 2005). · cites it 4×
United States v. Allen, Neal K. (7th Cir. 2008). · cites it 4×
United States v. Roland Pugh Constr., Inc. (11th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Nicholas Gossi (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Michael Monzel (D.C. Cir. 2011). · cites it 4×
United States v. Shondrell Campbell (5th Cir. 2014). · cites it 4×
United States v. Johnson, 58 F. App'x 60 (6th Cir. 2003). · cites it 4×
United States v. Craig, 359 F. App'x 289 (3rd Cir. 2009). · cites it 4×
United States v. Witham, 2010 DNH 097P (D.N.H. 2010). · cites it 4×
United States v. Flemons, 277 F. App'x 367 (5th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Stephen Murphy, 385 F. App'x 745 (9th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Anderson, 419 F. App'x 16 (2d Cir. 2011).
United States v. Poole, 4 F. App'x 262 (6th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Oak, 9 F. App'x 791 (9th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Manuel, 29 F. App'x 451 (9th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Tondre, 49 F. App'x 127 (9th Cir. 2002).
White v. United States, 69 F. App'x 222 (6th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Sampson, 85 F. App'x 592 (9th Cir. 2004).
United States v. Fuentes (11th Cir. 1997). · cites it 6×
In Re: Abdur Amin Rashid, 210 F.3d 201 (3rd Cir. 2000).
United States v. Baig (2d Cir. 2016). · cites it 2×
United States v. Sergio Lagos (5th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lawrence Singleton (4th Cir. 2018). · cites it 2×
United States v. Zander (10th Cir. 2018). · cites it 2×
United States v. Williams (D.D.C. 2018). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lindani Mzembe (7th Cir. 2019). · cites it 2×
United States v. Philip Muchisky (3rd Cir. 2020). · cites it 2×
United States v. John Krisnik (8th Cir. 2022). · cites it 2×
United States v. Elvis Harold Reyes (11th Cir. 2022). · cites it 2×
United States v. Cooksey (5th Cir. 2023). · cites it 2×
McPhaul v. USA - 2255 (D. Maryland 2020). · cites it 2×
United States v. Todd III (D.D.C. 2024). · cites it 2×
Thomas S. Miller (Tax Ct. 2025). · cites it 2×
United States v. Apolinaris (2d Cir. 2026). · cites it 2×
United States v. Ali Akhenaten (11th Cir. 2026). · cites it 2×
United States v. Kones (3rd Cir. 1996). · cites it 5×
United States v. Powell (5th Cir. 2004). · cites it 3×
United States v. Tommie Huff (11th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3×
United States v. Ernest Nelson, 454 F. App'x 574 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 3×
United States v. Sharay Johnson (5th Cir. 2011). · cites it 3×
United States v. Hiralall, 444 F. App'x 506 (2d Cir. 2011). · cites it 3×
United States v. Dennis Sutton, 506 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2013). · cites it 3×
People v. Robinson, 699 N.E.2d 1086 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). · cites it 2×
United States v. Mullins, 669 F. Supp. 2d 673 (W.D. Va. 2009). · cites it 3×
Jewell Allen, 568 F. App'x 314 (5th Cir. 2014). · cites it 3×
United States v. Anthony Cuti (2d Cir. 2014). · cites it 3×
United States v. Anthony Cuti (2d Cir. 2015). · cites it 3×
In Re: Alba Ines Rendon Galvis (2d Cir. 2009). · cites it 3×
United States v. Jerry Wallace, 451 F. App'x 523 (6th Cir. 2011). · cites it 3×
United States v. Randle, William H. (7th Cir. 2003). · cites it 3×
United States v. Ben R. Bush, Jr. (8th Cir. 2001). · cites it 3×
United States v. Ione E. Fogg (8th Cir. 2005). · cites it 3×
United States v. Hawes (3rd Cir. 2008). · cites it 3×
United States v. Hawes (3rd Cir. 2008). · cites it 3×
United States v. James Chalupnik (8th Cir. 2008). · cites it 3×
United States v. Tommie Huff (11th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3×
USA Vbussell (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 3×
United States v. Allen, 51 F. App'x 167 (6th Cir. 2002). · cites it 3×
United States v. Osorio, 58 F. App'x 875 (2d Cir. 2003). · cites it 3×
United States v. Minter, 146 F. App'x 123 (9th Cir. 2005). · cites it 3×
United States v. Rider, 274 F. App'x 207 (3rd Cir. 2008). · cites it 3×
United States v. Juv. Female, 296 F. App'x 547 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 3×
Allied Bearings v. Schad (10th Cir. 1998). · cites it 4×
Auclair v. Sher, 866 F. Supp. 322 (W.D. Tex. 1994). · cites it 4×
United States v. Arnold, 984 F. Supp. 326 (E.D. Pa. 1997).
People v. Dimoski, 780 N.W.2d 896 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009).
United States v. Castello (2d Cir. 2009). · cites it 2×
United States v. Holland, 394 F. App'x 766 (2d Cir. 2010). · cites it 2×
United States v. Harvey, 405 F. App'x 724 (4th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2×
United States v. Ronald Bryant (4th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2×
United States v. Thomas Ernst, 488 F. App'x 667 (4th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2×
United States v. Miller, 5 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2×
United States v. Metz, 791 F. Supp. 2d 533 (N.D.W. Va. 2011). · cites it 2×
United States v. Duncan, 311 F. Supp. 2d 757 (N.D. Ind. 2004). · cites it 2×
United States v. Pipkin, 541 F. Supp. 2d 1068 (N.D. Iowa 2008). · cites it 2×
United States v. Castro, 500 F. Supp. 2d 327 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). · cites it 2×
United States v. Smith (6th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
United States v. Owens (6th Cir. 2005). · cites it 2×
United States v. Stone (6th Cir. 2005). · cites it 2×
United States v. Stone (6th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2×
United States v. Blairtorbett (6th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2×
United States v. Donaby, Antonio A. (7th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
United States v. Feldman (3rd Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
United States v. Rufus Todd Jones, 56 F. App'x 295 (8th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
United States v. Fallon, 317 F. App'x 128 (3rd Cir. 2008). · cites it 2×
United States v. Abuhouran, 277 F. App'x 132 (3rd Cir. 2008). · cites it 2×
United States v. Gary Allen Reichow (8th Cir. 2005). · cites it 2×
United States v. Cienfuegos (9th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2×
United States v. Richard A. Oslund (8th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2×
United States v. James R. Brown (11th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2×
United States v. Gianelli (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2×
United States v. Stevens Nore, 631 F. App'x 800 (11th Cir. 2015). · cites it 2×
United States v. Tomlinson, 12 F. App'x 235 (6th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2×
United States v. Jull, 24 F. App'x 686 (9th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2×
United States v. Hoffman, 53 F. App'x 822 (9th Cir. 2002). · cites it 2×
United States v. Tharp, 72 F. App'x 693 (9th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
United States v. Aboughazala, 75 F. App'x 635 (9th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2×
United States v. Culkin, 177 F. App'x 675 (9th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2×
United States v. Hotte, 328 F. App'x 740 (2d Cir. 2009). · cites it 2×
United States v. Juv., 188 F. App'x 650 (9th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2×
United States v. Mayhew, 213 F. App'x 586 (9th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2×
United States v. Munz, 227 F. App'x 554 (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2×
United States v. Atkinson (5th Cir. 2000). · cites it 3×
United States v. Siegel, 153 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 1998). · cites it 3×
United States v. Bramson (4th Cir. 1997). · cites it 3×
United States v. Watts (4th Cir. 1998). · cites it 3×
United States v. Mayorga (4th Cir. 1999). · cites it 3× “Although a defendant can agree to restitution beyond the limits of § 3663(a)(1) and (2), see 18 U.S.C.§ 3663(a)(3), here the language of the plea agreement is at best ambiguous concerning whether the parties intended that restitution could be awarded to victims of offenses other…”
United States v. Sarvis, 102 F. Supp. 2d 514 (D. Vt. 2000). · cites it 3×
Weinberger v. United States, 71 F. Supp. 2d 803 (S.D. Ohio 1999). · cites it 3×
United States v. Thomas Karam (4th Cir. 2000). · cites it 3×
United States v. Ubakanma (4th Cir. 2000). · cites it 3× “See 18 U.S.C.§ 3663(a)(1)(A); see also 18 U.S.”
United States v. Turcks (3rd Cir. 1994). · cites it 3×
United States v. Edmond X. Ramirez (8th Cir. 1999). · cites it 3×
United States v. Mitchell, 723 F. Supp. 380 (E.D. La. 1989). · cites it 3×
United States v. Webb, 883 F. Supp. 197 (E.D. Mich. 1995). · cites it 3×
Spritzer v. United States, 968 F. Supp. 206 (D.N.J. 1997). · cites it 3×
Ricardo Bonilla v. Loretta Lynch, 632 F. App'x 213 (5th Cir. 2016).
United States v. Pruitt (2d Cir. 2016).
United States v. Mariano Pangelinan, 656 F. App'x 382 (9th Cir. 2016).
United States v. Loren Dodds, 668 F. App'x 771 (9th Cir. 2016).
United States v. Chao Fan Xu, 660 F. App'x 490 (9th Cir. 2016).
United States v. Chao Fan Xu, 673 F. App'x 616 (9th Cir. 2016).
United States v. Ramiro Serrata, Jr., 679 F. App'x 337 (5th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Taylor, 683 F. App'x 62 (2d Cir. 2017).
United States v. Kenneth Davis, 685 F. App'x 511 (8th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Mark Bristow, 690 F. App'x 826 (4th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Omar Coria, 692 F. App'x 300 (7th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Dennis Michael Elser, 702 F. App'x 863 (11th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Faiger Blackwell, 695 F. App'x 64 (4th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Daniel Thody, 697 F. App'x 433 (5th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Troy D. Stewart, 699 F. App'x 281 (4th Cir. 2017).
United States v. Clarence Garretson, 709 F. App'x 417 (8th Cir. 2018).
United States v. David Price (7th Cir. 2018).
United States v. David Price (7th Cir. 2018).
United States v. Williams (D.D.C. 2019).
United States v. Cean (2d Cir. 2019).
United States v. Williams (D.D.C. 2019).
United States v. Williams (D.D.C. 2019).
United States v. John Acord (5th Cir. 2020).
United States v. James Simon (7th Cir. 2020).
United States v. Little (2d Cir. 2020).
United States v. Boutros (D.D.C. 2020).
United States v. Gassaway (5th Cir. 2021).
United States v. Luis El Mateo (11th Cir. 2022).
United States v. Ely (2d Cir. 2022).
United States v. Joe (5th Cir. 2022).
United States v. Benavides (5th Cir. 2022).
United States v. Jack Kachkar (11th Cir. 2022).
United States v. Sarad, 227 F. Supp. 3d 1153 (E.D. Cal. 2016).
United States v. Stevens, 239 F. Supp. 3d 417 (D. Conn. 2017).
United States v. Nix, 256 F. Supp. 3d 272 (W.D.N.Y. 2017).
United States v. Cordio, 267 F. Supp. 3d 317 (D. Mass. 2017).
United States v. Allen, 364 F. Supp. 3d 1234 (D. Kan. 2019).
Wilkinson v. Parker, 263 So. 3d 987 (La. Ct. App. 2018).
Mehlek Dawveed (Tax Ct. 2023).
United States v. Robert Packer (D.C. Cir. 2023).
Maasen v. United States (D. Ariz. 2020).
Christensen v. United States (D. Ariz. 2021).
Doe v. United States (S.D. Fla. 2019).
United States v. Lattas (N.D. Ill. 2023).
United States v. Watson (N.D.N.Y. 2024).
Arnoff v. PNC Bank N.A. (N.D. Ohio 2022).
United States v. Stenger (2d Cir. 2024).
United States v. Christina Barrera, 112 F.4th 614 (8th Cir. 2024).
United States v. Harvey Hugs, 112 F.4th 632 (8th Cir. 2024).
Solis v. Watson (S.D. Ind. 2024).
Richards v. Vuksic (S.D.W. Va 2018).
United States v. Borino (5th Cir. 2024).
United States v. Velez (2d Cir. 2024).
United States v. Johnson, 125 F.4th 1352 (10th Cir. 2025).
United States v. Dibee (9th Cir. 2025).
United States v. Berman (D.D.C. 2025).
United States v. West (5th Cir. 2025).
Pinson v. United States (S.D. Ala. 2025).
Veleta Williams (Tax Ct. 2025).
Nicastro (N.D.N.Y. 2025).
United States v. Griffin (1st Cir. 2025).
People v. Kopp (Cal. 2025).
United States v. Jones (D.D.C. 2026).
Paul Daugerdas v. CIR (7th Cir. 2026).
Koile v. State, 935 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 2006). · cites it 2×
In the Matter of the Reinstatement of Hird, 2015 OK 70 (Okla. 2015). · cites it 2× “Hird's sentence was modified, upon motion of the government pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3663(d), because of Hird's substantial assistance in the case.”
U.S. v. Asset (5th Cir. 1993). · cites it 2×
United States v. Reese (5th Cir. 1993). · cites it 2×
United States v. Reese (5th Cir. 1993). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lewis (5th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2×
United States v. Davis (11th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2×
United States v. Vaghela, 169 F.3d 729 (11th Cir. 1999). · cites it 2×
United States v. Romines, 204 F.3d 1067 (11th Cir. 2000). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lawson (10th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2×
United States v. Sundstrom (10th Cir. 2000). · cites it 2×
United States v. Shepard (4th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2×
United States v. Bettie (4th Cir. 2000). · cites it 2×
United States v. Scheck, 783 F. Supp. 1109 (N.D. Ill. 1991). · cites it 2×
United States v. Am. Diversified Def., Inc., 702 F. Supp. 1551 (N.D. Ala. 1988). · cites it 2×
United States v. Hallman (3rd Cir. 1994). · cites it 2×
United States v. Mary Nathell Jones (8th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2×
United States v. Gerald Greger (8th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2×
United States v. Lee Vernell Jackson (8th Cir. 1998). · cites it 2×
Effects of a Presidential Pardon (OLC 1995). · cites it 2×
In re DuPage Boiler Workers, Inc., 965 F.2d 296 (7th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2×
United States v. Szarwark, 40 F. Supp. 2d 1020 (N.D. Ind. 1998). · cites it 2×
United States v. Hudack, 883 F. Supp. 194 (E.D. Mich. 1995). · cites it 2×
Matter of Mikhlov v. Festinger, 2019 NY Slip Op 4046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019). “Petitioner argued, inter alia, that he is a proper party for bringing the proceeding as a victim named in the Restitution Judgment under either the old version of 18 USCA § 3663(h)(2) or the amended version, the MVRA.”
United States v. Whittington (5th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Caldwell (5th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Medlin (5th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Griffin (5th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Hickman (5th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Driver (5th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Collins (5th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Fairchild (5th Cir. 2004).
United States v. Miller (5th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Love (5th Cir. 2005).
State of Louisiana v. Guidry (5th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Martin L. Harrell, 237 F. App'x 441 (11th Cir. 2007).
United States v. W. Dexter Harrison, 246 F. App'x 640 (11th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Thompson (5th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Jackson, 381 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2010).
Stanfa v. Booker, 12 F. App'x 822 (10th Cir. 2001).
United States v. K. (10th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Hudson (10th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Manning, Jr., 305 F. App'x 518 (10th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Senninger, 435 F. App'x 743 (10th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Senninger, 429 F. App'x 762 (10th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Gonzalez (2d Cir. 2011).
United States v. Gonzalez (2d Cir. 2011).
United States v. Fumo, 655 F.3d 288 (3rd Cir. 2011).
United States v. Stephen Ulrich, 444 F. App'x 548 (3rd Cir. 2011).
United States v. Rodolfo Guitierrez, Jr., 453 F. App'x 705 (9th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Bosgang, 467 F. App'x 27 (2d Cir. 2012).
Joyce Hickman v. Joe Keffer (5th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Bret Riggin, 522 F. App'x 381 (9th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Bollin (4th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Paxton, 15 F. App'x 72 (4th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Wager, 45 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Crow, 256 F. App'x 595 (4th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Bryant, 292 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Blevins, 327 F. App'x 446 (4th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Geff Yielding, 533 F. App'x 674 (8th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Rowsey, 431 F. Supp. 2d 903 (N.D. Ind. 2006).
United States v. Anderson, 235 F. Supp. 2d 877 (N.D. Ill. 2002).
United States v. Stanelle, 184 F. Supp. 2d 854 (E.D. Wis. 2002).
Strategic Def. Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 745 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (M.D. Fla. 2010).
United States v. Repp, 464 F. Supp. 2d 788 (E.D. Wis. 2006).
United States v. Saad, 544 F. Supp. 2d 589 (E.D. Mich. 2008).
United States v. Zandstra, 174 F. Supp. 2d 1 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).
United States v. Garcia, 478 F. Supp. 2d 1333 (D. Utah 2007).
United States v. Daniel Sporrer, 545 F. App'x 163 (3rd Cir. 2013).
People v. Hogg CA1/2 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013).
United States v. Markesha Hall, 583 F. App'x 390 (5th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Bernard Roemmele, 589 F. App'x 470 (11th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Angelo Efthimiatos, 603 F. App'x 503 (8th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Jose Suarez, 598 F. App'x 312 (5th Cir. 2015).
In re: Tyrell A. (Md. 2015).
United States v. Matthew Taylor, 609 F. App'x 934 (9th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Lancia, 610 F. App'x 49 (2d Cir. 2015).
United States v. Robin Lee, 611 F. App'x 467 (9th Cir. 2015).
United States v. John Mullen, 612 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Pearson (2d Cir. 2009).
United States v. Pescatore (2d Cir. 2011).
United States v. Bollin (4th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Johnson (4th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Davenport (4th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Roper (4th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Reaume (6th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Wood (6th Cir. 2004).
United States v. Montgomery, Lepize, 248 F. App'x 758 (7th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Broches, George, 261 F. App'x 897 (7th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Criniti, 41 F. App'x 531 (3rd Cir. 2002).
United States v. Grasso (3rd Cir. 2004).
United States v. Latimer, 101 F. App'x 370 (3rd Cir. 2004).
United States v. Podgers, 201 F. App'x 878 (3rd Cir. 2006).
United States v. Lessner (3rd Cir. 2007).
United States v. Mark Fuehrer, 46 F. App'x 377 (8th Cir. 2002).
USA Bussell (9th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Napier (9th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Doe (9th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Davis (9th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Moreland (9th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Marks (9th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Waknine (9th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Carla Denine Berry, 462 F. App'x 734 (9th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Benga Oyeniran, 586 F. App'x 338 (9th Cir. 2014).
In re the Reinstatement of Hird, 364 P.3d 628 (Okla. 2015).
In re C.W.M., 80 Pa. D. & C.4th 1 (2006).
United States v. Banzon, 5 F. App'x 673 (9th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Kowalewski, 8 F. App'x 19 (2d Cir. 2001).
United States v. Wyatt, 13 F. App'x 676 (9th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Taylor, 16 F. App'x 439 (6th Cir. 2001).
United States v. Mikaelian, 30 F. App'x 692 (9th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Jackson, 42 F. App'x 957 (9th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Carroll, 56 F. App'x 403 (9th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Paz, 61 F. App'x 481 (9th Cir. 2003).
Lobo-Lopez v. United States, 56 F. Supp. 3d 802 (E.D. Va. 2014).
United States v. Bartleson, 74 F. Supp. 3d 947 (N.D. Iowa 2015).
United States v. Guzman, 176 F. Supp. 3d 1012 (D. Or. 2015).
United States v. Crawford, 66 F. App'x 719 (9th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Hayden, 72 F. App'x 724 (9th Cir. 2003).
United States v. Castillo, 93 F. App'x 273 (2d Cir. 2004).
United States v. Lamere, 110 F. App'x 3 (9th Cir. 2004).
United States v. Pirtle, 158 F. App'x 878 (9th Cir. 2005).
United States v. Ross, 310 F. App'x 160 (9th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Ross, 310 F. App'x 160 (9th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Moore, 315 F. App'x 16 (9th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Moore, 315 F. App'x 16 (9th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Hernandez, 564 F. App'x 853 (7th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Evertson, 320 F. App'x 509 (9th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Evertson, 320 F. App'x 509 (9th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Brown, 359 F. App'x 658 (7th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Brown, 359 F. App'x 658 (7th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Robinson (In re Robinson), 483 B.R. 147 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 2012).
United States v. Hayes, 183 F. App'x 683 (9th Cir. 2006).
Brown v. Wachovia Bank, 191 F. App'x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
United States v. Gjidija, 208 F. App'x 57 (2d Cir. 2006).
United States v. Southerland, 209 F. App'x 656 (9th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Weathers, 216 F. App'x 678 (9th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Washington, 233 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Cir. 2007).
United States v. Geiger, 245 F. App'x 86 (2d Cir. 2007).
United States v. Winters, 278 F. App'x 781 (9th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Tallent, 872 F. Supp. 2d 679 (E.D. Tenn. 2012).
U.S. v. Jackson, 978 F.3d 903 (5th Cir. 1992).
U.S. v. Coleman (5th Cir. 1993).
United States v. Glinsey (5th Cir. 2000).
United States v. Schrimsher, 58 F.3d 608 (11th Cir. 1995).
United States v. Logal (11th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Exarhos, 135 F.3d 723 (11th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Brand, 163 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Whitlow (10th Cir. 1997).
Williams v. Reno (10th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Trujillo (10th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Martin (10th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Litson (10th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Fivaz (10th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Bowes (10th Cir. 1999).
United States v. Hicks (10th Cir. 1999).
United States v. Harris (10th Cir. 2000).
United States v. Dotson (10th Cir. 2000).
United States v. Perch (4th Cir. 1996).
United States v. Barnes (4th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Balac (4th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Robinson (4th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Evans (4th Cir. 1999).
United States v. Toni Hodge (4th Cir. 1999).
United States v. Hawkins (4th Cir. 2000).
Chatterjee v. United States Parole Comm'n, 731 F. Supp. 274 (N.D. Ill. 1990).
United States v. Collazo, 84 F. Supp. 2d 607 (E.D. Pa. 2000).
United States v. Miller (4th Cir. 1996).
United States v. Alalade (4th Cir. 2000).
United States v. Maurello (3rd Cir. 1996).
United States v. Copple (3rd Cir. 1996).
United States v. Juv. G.Z. (8th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Arthur Ross (8th Cir. 2000).
United States v. David Novak (8th Cir. 2000).
People v. Robinson (Ill. App. Ct. 1998).
Masri v. Masri, 48 Va. Cir. 5 (Chesterfield Cir. Ct. 1999).
— 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a) — 2 cases
United States v. McBride, 39 F. App'x 139 (6th Cir. 2002). “McBride nevertheless argues that by citing to “18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)” and “U.S.S.G. § 5El.”
United States v. Lazarenko, 555 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (N.D. Cal. 2008). “§ 3663A and 18 U.S.C § 3663(a), the Court GRANTS Kiritchen-ko’s request for restitution in the amount of $19,473,309.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(1)(A) — 3 cases
United States v. Joshua Sizemore, 850 F.3d 821 (6th Cir. 2017). “The probation office assessed restitution, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663 , in the amount of $230,839.”
United States v. Lazarenko, 555 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (N.D. Cal. 2008). “§ 3663A and 18 U.S.C § 3663(a), the Court GRANTS Kiritchen-ko’s request for restitution in the amount of $19,473,309.”
United States v. Ubakanma (4th Cir. 2000). “See 18 U.S.C.§ 3663(a)(1)(A); see also 18 U.S.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(2) — 1 case
United States v. Michael Davis (96-5895) & Miles Jones (96-5905), 170 F.3d 617 (6th Cir. 1999). “18 U.S.C.A § 3663(a)(2) (Supp. 1992). This amended subsection expands the definition of a “victim” in cases such as mail fraud.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(3) — 1 case
United States v. Mayorga (4th Cir. 1999). “Although a defendant can agree to restitution beyond the limits of § 3663(a)(1) and (2), see 18 U.S.C.§ 3663(a)(3), here the language of the plea agreement is at best ambiguous concerning whether the parties intended that restitution could be awarded to victims of offenses other…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(B)(I) — 1 case
United States v. Amos Searan & Jeanettia Searan, 259 F.3d 434 (6th Cir. 2001). “For the proposition that courts must consider the financial resources of the defendant in determining whether to order restitution, she cites “18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(B)(I),” by which she apparently means 18 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3663(b)(2) — 1 case
United States v. Monroe Melvin Husky, Jr., 924 F.2d 223 (11th Cir. 1991). “1985), the Ninth Circuit held that the list of compensable injuries in 18 U.S. C.A. § 3663(b)(2) is exclusive: Unlike an award of damages in a civil action, a restitution order under the Act may compensate only for the kind of harms enumerated in [ 18 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3663(c)(1) — 1 case
United States v. Vigil, 998 F. Supp. 2d 1121 (D.N.M. 2014). “)(noting that “the Court has discretion to impose restitution for harm to the community for drug-trafficking,” in light of “18 U.S.C. § 3663(c)(1) [ Mating that ‘when sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense described in .”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3663(d) — 1 case
In the Matter of the Reinstatement of Hird, 2015 OK 70 (Okla. 2015). “Hird's sentence was modified, upon motion of the government pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3663(d), because of Hird's substantial assistance in the case.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3663(h)(2) — 1 case
Matter of Mikhlov v. Festinger, 2019 NY Slip Op 4046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019). “Petitioner argued, inter alia, that he is a proper party for bringing the proceeding as a victim named in the Restitution Judgment under either the old version of 18 USCA § 3663(h)(2) or the amended version, the MVRA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.