18 U.S.C. § 3556
Order of restitution
The court, in imposing a sentence on a defendant who has been found guilty of an offense shall order restitution in accordance with section 3663A, and may order restitution in accordance with section 3663. The procedures under section 3664 shall apply to all orders of restitution under this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 92
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: United States v. Patrick V., 359 F.3d 3 (1st Cir. 2004).
United States v. Patrick V., 359 F.3d 3 (1st Cir. 2004). “1 But it recommended “a significant order of restitution” and also noted that if the court chose to invoke 18 U.S.C. § 3556 , full restitution was made mandatory by the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996, 18 U.”
United States v. H. Ty Warner, 792 F.3d 847 (7th Cir. 2015). “” 18 U.S.C. § 3556 (a)(6). Warner is not similar to the government’s comparators.”
United States v. Corley, 500 F.3d 210 (3rd Cir. 2007). “18 U.S.C. §§ 3556 , 3663A(a)(1), in the MVRA require district courts to order restitution for certain crimes, including thosesuch as Corley's"in which an identifiable victim or victims has suffered a physical injury or pecuniary loss.”
United States v. Samuel Volpendesto, 755 F.3d 448 (7th Cir. 2014). “With- out a final criminal conviction, there can be no order of resti- tution under 18 U.S.C. § 3556 . The district court’s judgment is VACATED and the case is DISMISSED as moot.”
United States v. Billie Jerome Allen, United States of Am. v. Norris G. Holder, 247 F.3d 741 (8th Cir. 2001). “See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3556 , 3663, 3663A, and 3664 (Supp.”
United States v. Michael J. Muzio, 757 F.3d 1243 (11th Cir. 2014). “29 18 U.S.C. § 3556 , “Order of restitution,” states: “The court, in imposing a sentence on a defendant who has been found guilty of an offense shall order restitution in accordance with section 3663A, and may order restitution in accordance with section 3663.”
United States v. Enyinnaya Udo, 795 F.3d 24 (D.C. Cir. 2015). “See 18 U.S.C. § 3556 . Relevant here, a court may order restitution to the victim of an offense for which the defendant was convicted.”
United States v. Maturin, 488 F.3d 657 (5th Cir. 2007). “The district court’s award of restitution in this case is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3556 , which provides that “[t]he court, in imposing a sentence on a defendant who has been found guilty of an offense shall order restitution in accordance with [18 U.”
United States v. Amato, 540 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. 2008). “at 1227 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3556 ). The VWPA’s discretionary restitution provisions (as amended over the years) remain in 18 U.”
United States v. James Frith, Jr., 461 F.3d 914 (7th Cir. 2006). “” 18 U.S.C. § 3556 . The restitution statute further provides that “[t]he procedures under section 3664 shall apply to all orders of restitution under this section.”
United States v. Danik Shiv Kumar, 750 F.3d 563 (6th Cir. 2014). “, including restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3556 ) or any other condition it considers to be appropriate, so long as it is reasonably related to the sentencing factors prescribed in 18 U.”
United States v. White, 620 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 2010). “See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3556 , 3663A(c)(l)(A)(ii). These circumstances indicate that the majority’s reliance on White’s period of detention, even if it were possible to predict, is simply too meager a basis on which to rest an order effectively releasing her without a trial.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.