18 U.S.C. § 3673

Definitions for sentencing provisions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar
As used in chapters 227 and 229—(1) the term “found guilty” includes acceptance by a court of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere;(2) the term “commission of an offense” includes the attempted commission of an offense, the consummation of an offense, and any immediate flight after the commission of an offense; and(3) the term “law enforcement officer” means a public servant authorized by law or by a government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of an offense.(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 212(a)(4), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2010; amended Pub. L. 99–646, § 2(a), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3592.)Editorial NotesAmendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–646 redesignated pars. (a) to (c) as (1) to (3), respectively, and inserted “the term” after “(1)”, “(2)”, and “(3)”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1986 Amendment

Pub. L. 99–646, § 2(b), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3592, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the taking effect of section 3673 of title 18, United States Code [Nov. 1, 1987].”

Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of this section, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3551 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lonnie G. SCHMIDT, Defendant-Appellant (1996) ca9 ““Found Guilty ” Schmidt contends that he was not “found guilty” as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 3673 (1) because he pled not guilty and was then found guilty by a jury.”
United States v. Joseph Aitoro (2010) ca3 “) Counsel further points out that, under 18 U.S.C. § 3673 (1), a plea of nolo contendere has the same legal effect as a plea of guilty.”
Use of Federal Employees for Olympic Security (1996) olc “§3592 (c)(14) (“ For purposes o f this subparagraph, a Maw enforcement officer’ is a public servant authorized by law or by a G overnment agency o r Congress to conduct o r engage in the prevention , investigation, or prosecution or adjudication o f an offense” ); 18 U.S.C.…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.