28 U.S.C. § 1496
Disbursing officers’ claims
The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim by a disbursing officer of the United States or by his administrator or executor for relief from responsibility for loss, in line of duty, of Government funds, vouchers, records or other papers in his charge.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1953–2017 · leading case: Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200 (1993).
Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200 (1993). “," 28 U. S. C. § 1496 (emphases added). See also §§ 1497 and 1499 (granting jurisdiction to "render judgment" over other claims).”
Glidden Co. v. Zdanok, 370 U.S. 530 (1962). “§ 1494 (contractors or their sureties); 28 U. S. C. §§ 1496 , 2512 (disbursing officers).”
Royal Barry Shaw v. The United States, 357 F.2d 949 (Ct. Cl. 1966). “§ 1491 on the ground of wrongful dismissal, as well as to obtain “relief from responsibility for [the] loss” of Government funds under the special provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1496 and 2512. 1 Before his dismissal, Lieutenant Shaw was in the Supply Corps, United States Naval…”
Godfrey v. United States, 131 Fed. Cl. 111 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “In addition, the Government argues that a money damages claim for wrongful conviction, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1496 4 and 28 U.S.C. § 2613 , 5 must allege that Plaintiffs conviction has been reversed or set aside on the ground that he is not guilty or at new trial or rehearing…”
Ralcon, Inc. v. United States, 13 Cl. Ct. 294 (Ct. Cl. 1987). “Whatever force this argument may have in the abstract, it is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the language in another, albeit less well known, statute governing Claims Court jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1496 (1982). That provision, which also was revised and…”
Sese v. United States, 113 F. Supp. 658 (Ct. Cl. 1953). “A fourth group of cases referred to by plaintiff relates to the provision of Revised Statutes, § 1059, now 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1496 , 2501, which gave the Court of Claims jurisdiction to give relief to Government disbursing officers from responsibility on account of loss of…”
Keene Corp. v. United States, 28 Fed. Cl. 2035 (Fed. Cir. 1993). “,” 28 U.S.C. § 1496 (emphases added). See also 28 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.