29 U.S.C. § 2618

Special rules concerning employees of local educational agencies

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Application(1) In generalExcept as otherwise provided in this section, the rights (including the rights under section 2614 of this title, which shall extend throughout the period of leave of any employee under this section), remedies, and procedures under this subchapter shall apply to—(A) any “local educational agency” (as defined in section 7801 of title 20) and an eligible employee of the agency; and(B) any private elementary or secondary school and an eligible employee of the school.(2) DefinitionsFor purposes of the application described in paragraph (1):(A) Eligible employee

The term “eligible employee” means an eligible employee of an agency or school described in paragraph (1).

(B) Employer

The term “employer” means an agency or school described in paragraph (1).

(b) Leave does not violate certain other Federal laws

A local educational agency and a private elementary or secondary school shall not be in violation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), section 794 of this title, or title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), solely as a result of an eligible employee of such agency or school exercising the rights of such employee under this subchapter.

(c) Intermittent leave or leave on reduced schedule for instructional employees(1) In generalSubject to paragraph (2), in any case in which an eligible employee employed principally in an instructional capacity by any such educational agency or school requests leave under subparagraph (C) or (D) of section 2612(a)(1) of this title or under section 2612(a)(3) of this title that is foreseeable based on planned medical treatment and the employee would be on leave for greater than 20 percent of the total number of working days in the period during which the leave would extend, the agency or school may require that such employee elect either—(A) to take leave for periods of a particular duration, not to exceed the duration of the planned medical treatment; or(B) to transfer temporarily to an available alternative position offered by the employer for which the employee is qualified, and that—(i) has equivalent pay and benefits; and(ii) better accommodates recurring periods of leave than the regular employment position of the employee.(2) Application

The elections described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) shall apply only with respect to an eligible employee who complies with section 2612(e)(2) of this title.

(d) Rules applicable to periods near conclusion of academic termThe following rules shall apply with respect to periods of leave near the conclusion of an academic term in the case of any eligible employee employed principally in an instructional capacity by any such educational agency or school:(1) Leave more than 5 weeks prior to end of termIf the eligible employee begins leave under section 2612 of this title more than 5 weeks prior to the end of the academic term, the agency or school may require the employee to continue taking leave until the end of such term, if—(A) the leave is of at least 3 weeks duration; and(B) the return to employment would occur during the 3-week period before the end of such term.(2) Leave less than 5 weeks prior to end of termIf the eligible employee begins leave under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 2612(a)(1) of this title or under section 2612(a)(3) of this title during the period that commences 5 weeks prior to the end of the academic term, the agency or school may require the employee to continue taking leave until the end of such term, if—(A) the leave is of greater than 2 weeks duration; and(B) the return to employment would occur during the 2-week period before the end of such term.(3) Leave less than 3 weeks prior to end of term

If the eligible employee begins leave under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 2612(a)(1) of this title or under section 2612(a)(3) of this title during the period that commences 3 weeks prior to the end of the academic term and the duration of the leave is greater than 5 working days, the agency or school may require the employee to continue to take leave until the end of such term.

(e) Restoration to equivalent employment position

For purposes of determinations under section 2614(a)(1)(B) of this title (relating to the restoration of an eligible employee to an equivalent position), in the case of a local educational agency or a private elementary or secondary school, such determination shall be made on the basis of established school board policies and practices, private school policies and practices, and collective bargaining agreements.

(f) Reduction of amount of liability

If a local educational agency or a private elementary or secondary school that has violated this subchapter proves to the satisfaction of the court that the agency, school, or department had reasonable grounds for believing that the underlying act or omission was not a violation of this subchapter, such court may, in the discretion of the court, reduce the amount of the liability provided for under section 2617(a)(1)(A) of this title to the amount and interest determined under clauses (i) and (ii), respectively, of such section.

(Pub. L. 103–3, title I, § 108, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 17; Pub. L. 103–382, title III, § 394(e), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4027; Pub. L. 107–110, title X, § 1076(v), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2093; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title V, § 585(a)(3)(H), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 131; Pub. L. 114–95, title IX, § 9215(hh), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2175.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is title VI of Pub. L. 91–230, Apr. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 175, which is classified generally to chapter 33 (§ 1400 et seq.) of Title 20, Education. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1400 of Title 20 and Tables.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 88–352, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 241. Title VI of the Act is classified generally to subchapter V (§ 2000d et seq.) of chapter 21 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000a of Title 42 and Tables.

Amendments

2015—Subsec. (a)(1)(A). Pub. L. 114–95 made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 7801 of title 20.

2008—Subsecs. (c)(1), (d)(2), (3). Pub. L. 110–181 inserted “or under section 2612(a)(3) of this title” after “section 2612(a)(1) of this title”.

2002—Subsec. (a)(1)(A). Pub. L. 107–110 substituted “section 7801 of title 20” for “section 8801 of title 20”.

1994—Subsec. (a)(1)(A). Pub. L. 103–382 substituted “section 8801 of title 20” for “section 2891(12) of title 20”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of Title 20, Education.

Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–110 effective Jan. 8, 2002, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 107–110, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6301 of Title 20, Education.

Effective Date

Section effective 6 months after Feb. 5, 1993, except that, in the case of collective bargaining agreements in effect on that effective date, section applicable on the earlier of (1) the date of termination of such agreement, or (2) the date that occurs 12 months after Feb. 5, 1993, see section 405(b) of Pub. L. 103–3, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1998–2014 · leading case: O'Hara v. Mt. Vernon Bd. of Educ., 16 F. Supp. 2d 868 (S.D. Ohio 1998).
O'Hara v. Mt. Vernon Bd. of Educ., 16 F. Supp. 2d 868 (S.D. Ohio 1998). · cites it 4× “29 U.S.C. § 2618 (d)(1). It is undisputed that Superintendent Sitta-son, acting in accordance with CBA § 705(a), *892 required plaintiff to remain on parental leave for the balance of the school year which ended June 3, 1994.”
Lombardi v. Bd. of Trs. Hinsdale Sch. Dist. 86, 463 F. Supp. 2d 867 (N.D. Ill. 2006). · cites it 6× “Defendants contend that this section creates a much narrower definition of “employer” for FMLA suits brought by employees of local educational agencies than for FMLA suits generally. They assert further that this narrow definition does not permit suits against individual…”
Bellone v. Southwick-Tolland Reg'l Sch. Dist., 748 F.3d 418 (1st Cir. 2014). “See 29 U.S.C. § 2618 ; 29 C.F.R. §§ 825.600-825.”
Greer v. Cleveland Clinic Health Sys.-East Region, 503 F. App'x 422 (6th Cir. 2012). “) If an employer requires medical certification to take leave under the FMLA, such certification must state when the serious health condition began, the probable duration of the condition, and appropriate medical facts regarding the condition.”
Albert v. Runyon, 6 F. Supp. 2d 57 (D. Mass. 1998). “29 U.S.C. § 2618 (c)(1). An employer may, however, have its “health care provider .”
Cox v. Autozone, Inc., 990 F. Supp. 1369 (M.D. Ala. 1998). “29 U.S.C. § 2618 . To read a statute which is so concerned with limitations, so concerned with being non-intrusive, as justifying regulations which would provide leave greater than its text, is to stand the statute on its head.”
Sarno v. Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & Ives, Inc., 17 F. Supp. 2d 271 (S.D.N.Y. 1998). “” 29 U.S.C. § 2618 . Furthermore, 29 U.S.C.”
Electrolux Home Prods., Inc. v. United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers of Am., 343 F. Supp. 2d 747 (N.D. Iowa 2004). “” 29 U.S.C. § 2618 (a). Federal courts have deemed a certification to be sufficient if it states the date on which the serious health condition commenced, the probable duration of the condition, the appropriate medical facts within the knowledge of the health care provider…”
Aboulhosn v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 940 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (C.D. Cal. 2013). “He argues that an employer waives its ability to argue, as a defense to an FMLA claim, that the employee’s family member did not suffer from a “serious health condition,” if it does not request additional medical documentation and a second opinion from a medical provider under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.