U.S. Code » Title 40 » Subtitle SUBTITLE II— PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND WORKS › Part PART B— UNITED STATES CAPITOL › Chapter CHAPTER 51— UNITED STATES CAPITOL BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS

40 U.S.C. § 401

DEFINITIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 40 CasesGoogle Scholar
“In this Act [see Short Title of 2006 Amendment note set out under section 101 of this title], the following definitions apply:“(1) The term ‘Administrator’ means the Administrator of General Services.“(2) The term ‘Director’ means the Director of the National Park Service.“(3) The term ‘Map’ means the map entitled ‘Transfer and Conveyance of Properties in the District of Columbia’, numbered 869/80460, and dated July 2005, which shall be kept on file in the appropriate office of the National Park Service.“(4) The term ‘park purposes’ includes landscaped areas, pedestrian walkways, bicycle trails, seating, opensided shelters, natural areas, recreational use areas, and memorial sites reserved for public use.“(5) The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of the Interior.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35 cases, 1934–1943 · leading case: Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood Cnty., 91 F.2d 665 (4th Cir. 1937).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood Cnty., 91 F.2d 665 (4th Cir. 1937). · cites it 8× “, 40 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq., for the construction of the project.”
Greenwood Cnty. v. Duke Power Co., 81 F.2d 986 (4th Cir. 1936). · cites it 7× “[ 40 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq.]) should be construed as authorizing the loan or grant for such a project, the act was to that extent invalid in that it exceeded the constitutional limits of congressional power; (4) that the act was invalid in that it attempted to delegate…”
Kansas Gas & Elec. Co. v. City of Indep., Kan., 79 F.2d 32 (10th Cir. 1935). · cites it 5× “200 [40 USCA § 401 et seq.]), or the acts of the Administrator thereunder, because we reach a conclusion adverse to the Electric Company on the broader question.”
Missouri Utils. Co. v. City of California, 8 F. Supp. 454 (W.D. Mo. 1934). · cites it 3× “In title 2 of that act (40 USCA § 401 et seq.), the President was authorized to create a Federal Emergency Administrator of Public Works.”
United States v. Boyle, 52 F. Supp. 906 (N.D. Ohio 1943). · cites it 8× “200 , 201, 202, 40 U.S.C. §§ 401 , 402, 403, 40 U.S. C.A.”
United States v. Certain Lands in City of Louisville, Jefferson Cnty., 78 F.2d 684 (6th Cir. 1935). · cites it 2× “Section 201 (a) of title 2 of the National Industrial Recovery Act (40 USCA § 401 (a) authorizes the President to create a Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and to appoint a Federal Emergency Administrator.”
United States v. Sixty Acres, More or Less, of Land in Williamson Cnty., 28 F. Supp. 368 (E.D. Ill. 1939). · cites it 2× “, 40 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq. and various Executive Orders thereunder.”
Potomac Elec. Power Co. v. United States, 85 F.2d 243 (D.C. Cir. 1936). “195 , 200 ( 40 U.S.C.A. § 401 ), under which the President was authorized to create a Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works, the powers of which were to be exercised by an Administrator appointed by the President.”
United States v. Eighty Acres of Land in Williamson Cnty., 26 F. Supp. 315 (E.D. Ill. 1939). “, 40 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq.), commonly known as the National Industrial Recovery Act, an Act of Congress approved April 8, 1935 ( 49 Stat.”
Oklahoma City v. Sanders, 94 F.2d 323 (10th Cir. 1938). “200 , 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 401 (a), 402, 403. The land described in the bill was acquired and the project authorized under the terms of said statute.”
Tennessee Elec. Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 21 F. Supp. 947 (E.D. Tenn. 1938). “It is not questioned that loans were made within the provisions of the Public Works Administration statute, 40 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq. The validity of that statute is not attacked in this proceeding, and we therefore assume that it is valid.”
Balter v. Ickes, 89 F.2d 856 (D.C. Cir. 1937). “, 40 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq.) nor the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 ( 15 U.”
Show all 35 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.