40 U.S.C. § 101
SHORT TITLE.
“This title may be cited as the ‘AI in Government Act of 2020’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42
cases (26 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: State of Georgia v. President of the United States, 46 F.4th 1283 (11th Cir. 2022).
State of Georgia v. President of the United States, 46 F.4th 1283 (11th Cir. 2022). “See 40 U.S.C. § 101 (“The purpose of this subtitle is to provide the Federal Gov- ernment with an economical and efficient system” for activities in- cluding “[p]rocuring and supplying property and nonpersonal ser- vices, and performing related functions.”
Bradford v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 101 F.4th 707 (10th Cir. 2024). “President Biden issued EO 14,026 pursuant to his authority under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (“FPASA”), 40 U.S.C. §§ 101–1315, which authorizes the President to “prescribe policies and directives that the President considers necessary to carry out” FPASA…”
State of Louisiana v. Biden, 55 F.4th 1017 (5th Cir. 2022). “9 40 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. 10 40 U.S.C. § 101 .”
Kristin Mayes v. Joseph Biden, 67 F.4th 921 (9th Cir. 2023). “BIDEN 9 OPINION BENNETT, Circuit Judge: The purpose of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (“Procurement Act”), 40 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., “is to provide the Federal Government with an economical and efficient system for .”
State of Nebraska v. Julie A. Su, 121 F.4th 1 (9th Cir. 2024). “” 40 U.S.C. § 101 (1). In 2014, President Obama invoked the FPASA to issue an executive order requiring federal contractors to pay 8 STATE OF NEBRASKA V.”
Commonwealth of Ky. v. Joseph R. Biden, 57 F.4th 545 (6th Cir. 2023). “40 U.S.C. §§ 101 , 121(a). The Presidents’ earliest invocations of the Property Act matched its relatively modest scope.”
UAW-Labor Emp. & Training Corp. v. Chao, 325 F.3d 360 (D.C. Cir. 2003). “(now codified as amended at 40 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.). The district court found preemption, granted declaratory relief, and issued a permanent injunction barring enforcement of the order.”
Role Models Am., Inc. v. White, 317 F.3d 327 (D.C. Cir. 2003). “the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 [ (FPA-SA), 40 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.],” DBCRA § 2905(b)(7)(P) — a statute designed to provide “an economical and efficient system for .”
Shawnee Tribe v. United States, 405 F.3d 1121 (10th Cir. 2005). “1062 , 1303 (codified as note preceding 40 U.S.C. § 101 ). Therefore, the Shawnee say we should interpret the current § 113(a) as meaning that the Property Act, and specifically § 523, is “paramount” and therefore that the GSA’s mandatory duties under § 523 attach regardless of…”
Audubon Naturalist Soc'y of the Cent. Atl. States, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Transp., 524 F. Supp. 2d 642 (D. Maryland 2007). “40 U.S.C. § 101 (b). The Corps did not concur at any part of the process until it was satisfied that their comments had been addressed, and the record shows that the Corps did exercise its independent judgment.”
David Donovan v. Brian Vance, 70 F.4th 1167 (9th Cir. 2023). “2 See 40 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (Procurement Act); 41 U.”
Shawnee Tribe v. United States, 423 F.3d 1204 (10th Cir. 2005). “1062 , 1303 (codified as *1215 note preceding 40 U.S.C. § 101 ). Therefore, the Shawnee say we should interpret the current § 113(a) as meaning that the Property Act, and specifically § 523, is “paramount” and therefore that the GSA’s mandatory duties under § 523 attach…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.