42 U.S.C. § 18083

Streamlining of procedures for enrollment through an Exchange and State medicaid, CHIP, and health subsidy programs

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In general

The Secretary shall establish a system meeting the requirements of this section under which residents of each State may apply for enrollment in, receive a determination of eligibility for participation in, and continue participation in, applicable State health subsidy programs. Such system shall ensure that if an individual applying to an Exchange is found through screening to be eligible for medical assistance under the State medicaid plan under title XIX 11 So in original. Probably should be followed by “of the Social Security Act”. [42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.], or eligible for enrollment under a State children’s health insurance program (CHIP) under title XXI of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1397aa et seq.], the individual is enrolled for assistance under such plan or program.

(b) Requirements relating to forms and notice(1) Requirements relating to forms(A) In generalThe Secretary shall develop and provide to each State a single, streamlined form that—(i) may be used to apply for all applicable State health subsidy programs within the State;(ii) may be filed online, in person, by mail, or by telephone;(iii) may be filed with an Exchange or with State officials operating one of the other applicable State health subsidy programs; and(iv) is structured to maximize an applicant’s ability to complete the form satisfactorily, taking into account the characteristics of individuals who qualify for applicable State health subsidy programs.(B) State authority to establish form

A State may develop and use its own single, streamlined form as an alternative to the form developed under subparagraph (A) if the alternative form is consistent with standards promulgated by the Secretary under this section.

The Secretary may allow a State to use a supplemental or alternative form in the case of individuals who apply for eligibility that is not determined on the basis of the household income (as defined in section 36B of title 26).

(2) Notice

The Secretary shall provide that an applicant filing a form under paragraph (1) shall receive notice of eligibility for an applicable State health subsidy program without any need to provide additional information or paperwork unless such information or paperwork is specifically required by law when information provided on the form is inconsistent with data used for the electronic verification under paragraph (3) or is otherwise insufficient to determine eligibility.

Each State shall develop for all applicable State health subsidy programs a secure, electronic interface allowing an exchange of data (including information contained in the application forms described in subsection (b)) that allows a determination of eligibility for all such programs based on a single application. Such interface shall be compatible with the method established for data verification under section 18081(c)(4) of this title.

(2) Data matching programEach applicable State health subsidy program shall participate in a data matching arrangement for determining eligibility for participation in the program under paragraph (3) that—(A) provides access to data described in paragraph (3);(B) applies only to individuals who—(i) receive assistance from an applicable State health subsidy program; or(ii) apply for such assistance—(I) by filing a form described in subsection (b); or(II) by requesting a determination of eligibility and authorizing disclosure of the information described in paragraph (3) to applicable State health coverage subsidy programs for purposes of determining and establishing eligibility; and(C) consistent 22 So in original. Probably should be preceded by “is”. with standards promulgated by the Secretary, including the privacy and data security safeguards described in section 1942 of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1396w–2] or that are otherwise applicable to such programs.(3) Determination of eligibility(A) In generalEach applicable State health subsidy program shall, to the maximum extent practicable—(i) establish, verify, and update eligibility for participation in the program using the data matching arrangement under paragraph (2); and(ii) determine such eligibility on the basis of reliable, third party data, including information described in sections 1137, 453(i), and 1942(a) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1320b–7, 653(i), 1396w–2(a)], obtained through such arrangement.(B) Exception

This paragraph shall not apply in circumstances with respect to which the Secretary determines that the administrative and other costs of use of the data matching arrangement under paragraph (2) outweigh its expected gains in accuracy, efficiency, and program participation.

(4) Secretarial standards

The Secretary shall, after consultation with persons in possession of the data to be matched and representatives of applicable State health subsidy programs, promulgate standards governing the timing, contents, and procedures for data matching described in this subsection. Such standards shall take into account administrative and other costs and the value of data matching to the establishment, verification, and updating of eligibility for applicable State health subsidy programs.

(d) Administrative authority(1) Agreements

Subject to section 18081 of this title and section 6103(l)(21) of title 26 and any other requirement providing safeguards of privacy and data integrity, the Secretary may establish model agreements, and enter into agreements, for the sharing of data under this section.

(2) Authority of exchange to contract outNothing in this section shall be construed to—(A) prohibit contractual arrangements through which a State medicaid agency determines eligibility for all applicable State health subsidy programs, but only if such agency complies with the Secretary’s requirements ensuring reduced administrative costs, eligibility errors, and disruptions in coverage; or(B) change any requirement under title XIX ¹ that eligibility for participation in a State’s medicaid program must be determined by a public agency.(e) Applicable State health subsidy programIn this section, the term “applicable State health subsidy program” means—(1) the program under this title 33 See References in Text note below. for the enrollment in qualified health plans offered through an Exchange, including the premium tax credits under section 36B of title 26 and cost-sharing reductions under section 18071 of this title;(2) a State medicaid program under title XIX of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.];(3) a State children’s health insurance program (CHIP) under title XXI of such Act [42 U.S.C. 1397aa et seq.]; and(4) a State program under section 18051 of this title establishing qualified basic health plans.(Pub. L. 111–148, title I, § 1413, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 233.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in subsecs. (a), (d)(2)(B), and (e)(2), (3), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620. Titles XIX and XXI of the Act are classified generally to subchapters XIX (§ 1396 et seq.) and XXI (§ 1397aa et seq.), respectively, of chapter 7 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of this title and Tables.

This title, where footnoted in subsec. (e)(1), is title I of Pub. L. 111–148, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 130, which enacted this chapter and enacted, amended, and transferred numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2014–2025 · leading case: Melissa Wilson v. Darin Gordon, 822 F.3d 934 (6th Cir. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Melissa Wilson v. Darin Gordon, 822 F.3d 934 (6th Cir. 2016). · cites it 10× “42 U.S.C. § 18083 (b)(1)(A)(iii). Thus, states must actually have a system in place for accepting streamlined applications directly.”

Craig Cunningham v. Gen. Dynamics Info., 888 F.3d 640 (4th Cir. 2018). · cites it 3× “The online application requires visitors to provide their name and phone number, and accept CMS's privacy policy by affirmatively clicking an "Accept" box acknowledging, inter alia , that CMS may use the phone number provided to contact them with more information.”

Craig Cunningham v. Deborah Lester, 990 F.3d 361 (4th Cir. 2021). · cites it 2× “” 42 U.S.C. §§ 18083 (a), (b)(2), (e). To fulfill this obligation, CMS partnered with a private company that possessed the technological capacity to help CMS satisfy its statutory mandate in a cost-effective manner.”

King v. Sebelius, 997 F. Supp. 2d 415 (E.D. Va. 2014). “§ 1803 l(d)(4)(I) (regarding information transmission to the IRS); 42 U.S.C. § 18083 (relating to applications made redundant or useless); 42 U.”

Winninger v. Scott (N.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. § 18083 (b). In March 2018, Plaintiff called 9 PHC and requested to be enrolled in the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.”

Cheng v. Speier (N.D. Cal. 2022). “” 42 U.S.C. §§ 18083 (a), (b)(2), (e). Unlike the defendant in Lewis, who was haled into court on account of his personal 12 negligence, the defendants, as CMS employees, were plainly acting in furtherance of this federal mandate when they signed the contract with GDIT and…”

Andrew Perrong v. Matthew Bradford (3rd Cir. 2025). “” 42 U.S.C. § 18083 (b)(2). And, if relief was granted, CMS would be forced to “implement[] a functional replacement” for using contractors to provide the statutorily mandated notice because a ruling for plaintiffs would void the existing government contracts for automated calls.”

Wills (N.D. Cal. 2025). “1’s requirements.16 The caselaw supports Kaiser’s position.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.