5 U.S.C. § 8116

Limitations on right to receive compensation

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 5 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) While an employee is receiving compensation under this subchapter, or if he has been paid a lump sum in commutation of installment payments until the expiration of the period during which the installment payments would have continued, he may not receive salary, pay, or remuneration of any type from the United States, except—(1) in return for service actually performed;(2) pension for service in the Army, Navy, or Air Force;(3) other benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs unless such benefits are payable for the same injury or the same death; and(4) retired pay, retirement pay, retainer pay, or equivalent pay for service in the Armed Forces or other uniformed services.However, eligibility for or receipt of benefits under subchapter III of chapter 83 of this title, or another retirement system for employees of the Government, does not impair the right of the employee to compensation for scheduled disabilities specified by section 8107(c) of this title.(b) An individual entitled to benefits under this subchapter because of his injury, or because of the death of an employee, who also is entitled to receive from the United States under a provision of statute other than this subchapter payments or benefits for that injury or death (except proceeds of an insurance policy), because of service by him (or in the case of death, by the deceased) as an employee or in the armed forces, shall elect which benefits he will receive. The individual shall make the election within 1 year after the injury or death or within a further time allowed for good cause by the Secretary of Labor. The election when made is irrevocable, except as otherwise provided by statute.(c) The liability of the United States or an instrumentality thereof under this subchapter or any extension thereof with respect to the injury or death of an employee is exclusive and instead of all other liability of the United States or the instrumentality to the employee, his legal representative, spouse, dependents, next of kin, and any other person otherwise entitled to recover damages from the United States or the instrumentality because of the injury or death in a direct judicial proceeding, in a civil action, or in admiralty, or by an administrative or judicial proceeding under a workmen’s compensation statute or under a Federal tort liability statute. However, this subsection does not apply to a master or a member of a crew of a vessel.(d) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section, an individual receiving benefits for disability or death under this subchapter who is also receiving benefits under subchapter III of chapter 84 of this title or benefits under title II of the Social Security Act shall be entitled to all such benefits, except that—(1) benefits received under section 223 of the Social Security Act (on account of disability) shall be subject to reduction on account of benefits paid under this subchapter pursuant to the provisions of section 224 of the Social Security Act; and(2) in the case of benefits received on account of age or death under title II of the Social Security Act, compensation payable under this subchapter based on the Federal service of an employee shall be reduced by the amount of any such social security benefits payable that are attributable to Federal service of that employee covered by chapter 84 of this title. However, eligibility for or receipt of benefits under chapter 84 of this title, or benefits under title II of the Social Security Act by virtue of service covered by chapter 84 of this title, does not affect the right of the employee to compensation for scheduled disabilities specified by section 8107(c) of this title.(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 542; Pub. L. 90–83, § 1(56), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 210; Pub. L. 93–416, § 9(a), Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1145; Pub. L. 99–335, title II, § 207(e), June 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 595; Pub. L. 102–54, § 13(b)(1), June 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 274; Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title X, § 1087(f)(3)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–293.)

Historical and Revision Notes
1966 Act
Derivation	U.S. Code	Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large
	5 U.S.C. 757.	Sept. 7, 1916, ch. 458, § 7, 39 Stat. 743.
		July 1, 1944, ch. 373, § 605(a), 58 Stat. 712.
		Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 958, § 5, 60 Stat. 1049.
		Oct. 14, 1949, ch. 691, § 201, 63 Stat. 861.
		July 30, 1956, ch. 779, § 3(b), 70 Stat. 721.
		Sept. 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–767, § 202, 74 Stat. 907.
		Sept. 4, 1964, Pub. L. 88–581, § 4(b), 78 Stat. 919.

In subsection (a)(2), “Air Force” is added on authority of the Act of July 26, 1947, ch. 343, § 207(a), (f), 61 Stat. 502, and sections 8010—8013 of title 10, United States Code. This does not affect the operation of this subsection insofar as it concerns members of the Coast Guard whose pension is based in whole or in part on service with the Coast Guard when it operated as a part of the Navy.

In subsection (b), the reference to the definition of “employee” in former section 790 is omitted as unnecessary as the definition is included in section 8101 for the entire subchapter.

Administration of this subchapter was transferred to the Secretary of Labor by section 1 of 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 19, 64 Stat. 1271 (see section 8145).

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

1967 Act
Section of title 5	Source (U.S.Code)	Source (Statutes at Large)
8116(a)	5 App.: 757(a).	July 4, 1966, Pub. L. 89–488, § 5(a), 80 Stat. 253.

The words “another retirement system for employees of the Government” are substituted for “any other Federal Act or program providing retirement benefits for employees”.

Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in subsec. (d), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620. Title II of the Social Security Act is classified generally to subchapter II (§ 401 et seq.) of chapter 7 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. Sections 223 and 224 are classified to sections 423 and 424a, respectively, of Title 42. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.

Amendments

2000—Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 106–398 struck out “, subject to the reduction of such pay in accordance with section 5532(b) of title 5, United States Code” after “uniformed services”.

1991—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 102–54 substituted “Department of Veterans Affairs” for “Veterans’ Administration”.

1986—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 99–335 added subsec. (d).

1974—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 93–416 struck out “and” in cl. (1), substituted a semicolon for a period in cl. (2), and added cls. (3) and (4).

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–335 effective Jan. 1, 1987, see section 702(a) of Pub. L. 99–335, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8401 of this title.

Effective Date of 1974 Amendment

Pub. L. 93–416, § 9(b), Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1145, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall be effective with respect to disability or death occurring before or after the date of enactment of this Act [Sept. 7, 1974] and without regard to any election under section 8116(b) of the Act [subsec. (b) of this section]; but no payment shall be made by reason of such amendment for any period prior to the date of enactment of this Act.”

Personnel Not Affected by 1967 Increase

Increases authorized under amendment by section 1(56) of Pub. L. 90–83 not applicable to specified personnel, see section 7 of Pub. L. 90–83, set out as a note under section 8103 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 349 cases (37 in the last 5 years), 1967–2026 · leading case: Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 460 U.S. 190 (1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 460 U.S. 190 (1983). · cites it 6× “Rather the Government moved to dismiss the third-party claim on the ground that it was barred by 5 U. S. C. § 8116 (c), FECA's exclusive-liability provision: "The liability of the United States .”

Mathirampuzha v. Potter, 548 F.3d 70 (2d Cir. 2008). · cites it 3× “9 See 5 U.S.C. § 8116 (c); 10 Votteler v. United States, 904 F.”

United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681 (1987). · cites it 4× “, 5 U. S. C. § 8116 (c). Recovery is possible under workers' compensation statutes more often than under the VBA, and VBA benefits can be terminated more easily than can workers' compensation.”

Annamma A. Ezekiel & Al Ezekiel v. Jaime T. Michel & United States of Am., 66 F.3d 894 (7th Cir. 1995). · cites it 3× “The court ruled that Ezekiel cannot maintain the suit against the United States under FTCA for she was a federal employee injured on the job, and her exclusive remedy is the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA), 5 U.S.C. § 8116 (c). The plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal…”

Travelers Ins. Co. v. L v. French Truck Serv., Inc., 770 P.2d 551 (Okla. 1989). · cites it 6× “Supreme Court from the "exclusive-liability" provision of the Federal Employees' Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8116 (c), infra, in Lockheed Aircraft Corp.”

Hightower v. United States, 205 F. Supp. 2d 146 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). · cites it 4× “See 5 U.S.C. § 8116 (c). Their final argument is that even if this Court had jurisdiction to hear plaintiffs state law tort claims against the United States under the FTCA, the FTCA does not waive the United States’ sovereign immunity for claims of slander and libel.”

Stencel Aero Eng'g Corp. v. United States, 431 U.S. 666 (1977). · cites it 2× “Indeed, the Veterans' Benefits Act does not even contain an explicit declaration that it is the exclusive remedy against the Government for a serviceman's injury.”

Terri L. NICHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster Gen.; U.S. Postal Serv., Defendants-Appellants, 42 F.3d 503 (9th Cir. 1994). · cites it 3× “See 5 U.S.C. § 8116 . Accordingly, the Postal Service claims that the district court erred in awarding Nichols the difference between her disability benefits and 100% of her back pay.”

Cletis Meredith Miller v. William Bolger, Postmaster Gen. of the United States Postal Serv. & the United States of Am., 802 F.2d 660 (3rd Cir. 1986). · cites it 4× “5 U.S.C. § 8116 (c). Moreover: An individual entitled to benefits under this subchapter because of his injury .”

Merrill Benton v. United States of Am. & the United States Postal Serv., 960 F.2d 19 (5th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2× “First, Benton argues that because she did not receive compensation under the FECA for the injuries claimed in the instant suit, the FECA exclusive remedy provision, 5 U.S.C. § 8116 (c), does not bar her claim.”

Humphrey v. United States Attorney Gen.'s Off., 279 F. App'x 328 (6th Cir. 2008). “§ 2401 (b), and Humphrey’s exclusive remedy was under the Federal Employees Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8116 (c). The second motion sought dismissal of Humphrey’s discrimination and retaliation claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal…”

William Dan Deford v. Sec'y of Labor, & Tennessee Valley Auth., Intervenor. Tennessee Valley Auth. v. Sec'y of Labor, 700 F.2d 281 (6th Cir. 1983). · cites it 3× “See 5 U.S.C. § 8116 (c); United States v. Demko, 385 U.”

Show all 349 citing cases →

— 5 U.S.C. § 8116(c) — 4 cases

Howard v. Bradshaw & Ona Bradshaw v. United States of Am., Howard v. Bradshaw & Ona Bradshaw v. United States, 443 F.2d 759 (D.C. Cir. 1971).

Walter R. Sanders & Earlean Sanders v. United States, 387 F.2d 142 (5th Cir. 1967).

Jarrett v. United States, 874 F.2d 201 (4th Cir. 1989).

Carroll v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 697 F. Supp. 508 (D.D.C. 1988).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.