5 U.S.C. § 5532
Repealed. Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title VI, § 651(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 664]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases, 1976–2020 · leading case: Puglisi v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 86 (Ct. Cl. 1977).
Puglisi v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 86 (Ct. Cl. 1977). “As retired regular officers they are permitted to receive their full civilian pay but, pursuant to the Dual Compensation Act of 1964, now 5 U.S.C. § 5532 (b) (1970), their retirement pay is substantially reduced.”
Sode v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 180 (Ct. Cl. 1976). “In interpreting the retirement pay reduction exemption provided by 5 U.S.C. § 5532 (c) (1) (A) “* * * our problem is to construe what Congress has written.”
In Re the Marriage of Gaddis, 957 P.2d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997). “22 deduction for the “dual compensation offset” required by 5 U.S.C. § 5532 (b), which provides: A retired officer of a regular component of a uniformed service who holds a [civil service] position is entitled to receive the full pay of the position, but during the period for…”
Ex Parte Burson, 615 S.W.2d 192 (Tex. 1981). “A partial defeasance can occur if the service person is a retired regular officer of the uniformed services who holds a federal civilian position with the federal government.”
Gallegos v. Gallegos, 788 S.W.2d 158 (Tex. App. 1990). “1989), and a partial defeasance because of appellant’s Civil Service employment under the Dual Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5532 (1980 & Supp. 1989). No request for findings of fact and conclusions of law was made.”
Ains, Inc. v. United States, 56 Fed. Cl. 522 (Fed. Cl. 2002). “So far as pertinent, it reads as passed in 1964: '(2) position’ means a civilian office or position .”
Vogt v. Vogt (In Re Vogt), 14 B.R. 743 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1981). “Had the plaintiff’s retirement pay decreased under 5 U.S.C. § 5532 , so too would his payments to the defendant.”
John M. Denkler v. The United States, 782 F.2d 1003 (Fed. Cir. 1986). “II Whether or not the limitations on “dual compensation” of retired regular officers in 5 U.S.C. § 5532 limits their right to annuities if employed by the board here involved, depends on the definition of “position” in section 5531(2).”
Viola v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 306 F. Supp. 3d 321 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “¶¶ 52-56 (citing 5 U.S.C. § 5532 (b)(7)(D) ). Records were additionally withheld pursuant to Exemption 7(E), which applies to records that "would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, *333 or would disclose guidelines for law…”
In Re Marriage of Krempin, 83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 134 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999). ““Although the [Former Spouses’ Protection] Act precludes a state court from dividing retirement pay waived pursuant to the dual compensation offset, the trial court did not do so in this case.”
United States v. Williams, 370 A.2d 1134 (Md. 1977). “977 (1964), and subjection to federal *678 dual compensation act, 5 U.S.C. § 5532 b. This led the court in Ables to reach the conclusion that retirement pay is not a pension for past services, but “a current salary earned on a monthly basis,” 540 S.”
Ables v. Ables, 540 S.W.2d 769 (Tex. App. 1976). “The husband says these facts and others he refers to show that the retired regular military officer does not have the unrestricted right of use, enjoyment and disposal of his accrued retired pay sufficient to constitute it a vested property right or class it as a pension for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.